User talk:Lipstick and Luggage

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lipstick and Luggage, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Lipstick and Luggage! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Let's talk[edit]

Dear users, Welcome to my talk page, if u have any questions about my edits, feel free to talk to me. Thank you. LAL (KB) (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)ṗ[reply]

December 2016[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aerolíneas Argentinas, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 12:10, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Lipstick and Luggage, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia. If you need assistance, check out the Getting Help section below or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please always fill in the edit summary field to describe your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Jetstreamer Talk 12:36, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

Writing articles
The community
Miscellaneous

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lipstick and Luggage (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, I am not really Nikolas.Sudarpo sock, because I live in the same place and I am another person against him. I have also already see the guide to unblock already to prevent damage to Wikipedia. LAL (KB) (talk) 10:11, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed sock. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lipstick and Luggage (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

So ok, I tried my best to login to my main account, but since I lost my password and my email, just need a new account to replace this one and UTRS said: If you forgot or email, just create a new account than do this, so I also read the guide to appeal block too to prevent distruption to Wikipedia. LAL (KB) (talk) 12:31, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No. You are deliberately evading a block on your main account. You are actively setting out to harm Wikipedia, and this is clear in that, since this unblock request, you have continued setting up accounts to get around your block. Yamla (talk) 13:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creating a new account and forgetting the old one is restricted to editors in good standing, and is not permitted for blocked editors with a lengthy history of sockpuppetry, which is plainly apparent at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nikolas.Sudarpo/Archive. I presume you neglected to reveal that to WP:UTRS? I have now revoked your ability to edit this talk page - I'll leave it to the next reviewing admin to decide whether to reinstate it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've just blocked another sock, Cindy Sunshine (talk · contribs). ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]