User talk:Siddsg: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:10, 20 July 2020

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 19:24, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Siddsg

Thank you for creating Om Prakash Sharma (Nagaland politician).

User:Joel B. Lewis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joel B. Lewis}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JBL (talk) 14:27, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Joel B. Lewis: Hi Joel, I have added reference to the official website of the Governor's website of Nagaland. Do you think that is a good reference? Siddsg (talk) 14:21, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Siddsg,

That reference is the one source that I mentioned. There is nothing wrong with it, but it contains almost no biographical information about the subject. The article would be greatly improved if you could find additional sources that say something more about Sharma.

All the best, JBL (talk) 17:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Border (1997 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wing Commander (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ramesh Sakharam Benegal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wing Commander (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harcharan Singh Manget for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harcharan Singh Manget is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harcharan Singh Manget until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~SS49~ {talk} 11:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2020 Delhi riots, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. The sources you cited don't mention the Delhi riots at all. Have reverted your edits. SerChevalerie (talk) 14:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Milhist!

Hello Siddsg and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nathu La and Cho La clashes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cho La (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:24, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement request (India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan)

I have requested arbitration enforcement in response to your disruptive editing in the India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan topic area. Please see WP:AE § Siddsg for details. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 22:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AE warning

I have closed the above report with a warning to you to make improvements in editing the IPA topic area. Please note that further problems are likely to lead to sanctions. Thanks and good luck. El_C 16:08, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maha Vir Chakra recipients

Hi Siddsg, and thank you for all your contributions to date! I noticed that you have created a lot of articles on recipients of the Maha Vir Chakra. While the recipients were undoubtedly gallant and deserving of admiration, I have some concerns about the notability of individual recipients. Our notability guideline for soldiers advises that soldiers are only notable for awards if they have gained their nations highest award (in India this would be the Param Vir Chakra). For winners of the second-level award, they are only considered notable of an article if they have 1) gotten the award multiple times, or 2) achieved a rank of OF-6 (or higher), or 3) been the subject of sufficient coverage to meet our basic notability guideline. You have created several articles on people who don't clearly meet any of those criteria, and I don't personally think they meet our notability guidelines. I'd recommend focusing on writing articles about people who clearly meet our guidelines (like OF-6 officers) to avoid any risk of deletion.

I'd also like to caution you to be careful about the tone that your articles are written in. Beware of editorializing and letting puffery slip into your writing. It is of the utmost importance that Wikipedia articles are written from a neutral point of view, which means that they should be largely absent of qualifiers and written in as neutral a tone as possible. For example, Wikipedia shouldn't describe somebody as displaying exemplary courage or say For his gallantry actions and bravery unless quoting a source. For those specific examples (taken from Imliakum Ao), I'd suggest rephrasing the sentences with exemplary courage as He was awarded the Maha Vir Chakra, India's second highest military decoration, for his service during the war and For his gallantry actions and bravery as For his actions. Do you see the difference? In one we are telling the reader what to think (that they were incredibly courageous) whereas in the other we just tell the reader what happened (they were given an award) and leave conclusions about bravery to the reader (which is what Wikipedia should strive for). Hopefully this was helpful, and I encourage you to reach out here, on my talk page or at the teahouse with any further questions or for clarification. I hope you continue contributing to the encyclopedia. Best wishes, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:10, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to reinforce what Eddie891 has said. In general, unless they have reached the rank of brigadier minimum, these soldiers will not meet the requirements of WP:SOLDIER, as the MVC is the second-tier gallantry award of India. Please stop creating these articles unless they have received the MVC twice or have reached the rank of brigadier. You will probably find many of the others will be deleted. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Captain Pratap Singh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Captain Pratap Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Pratap Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:10, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harbhajan Singh (military officer)

The article Harbhajan Singh (military officer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:22, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chand Singh (soldier)

A tag has been placed on Chand Singh (soldier) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.honourpoint.in/profile/naik-chand-singh-mvc/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zoodino (talk) 06:39, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chand Singh (soldier) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chand Singh (soldier) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chand Singh (soldier) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zoodino (talk) 17:07, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Tibet Autonomous Region. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Per this edit summary, criticism of your poor sourcing is not vandalism. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 18:27, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will see what can be gleaned from Human rights in Tibet in summary format, but as to your poor quality addition, only the Central Tibetan Administration alleges any systematic assault on culture which would be part of your quoted cultural genocide; your neglect to properly WP:ATTRIBUTE to the CTA while citing four other sources (thus giving the misleading impression of their verification) cannot be seen as anything other than WP:POV pushing. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 18:38, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harbhajan Singh (military officer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harbhajan Singh (military officer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harbhajan Singh (military officer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Subedar Sansar Chand for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Subedar Sansar Chand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subedar Sansar Chand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:36, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 GirthSummit _(blether) 12:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For the avoidance of doubt, I want to stress that I am not accusing you of any wrong-doing. You appear not to have been notified about this before, so I am making sure that you are aware. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 12:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Narinder Singh Sandhu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Narinder Singh Sandhu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narinder Singh Sandhu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zoodino (talk) 16:11, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G’day Siddsg, I believe I have now rescued this article from AfD. This is the standard of sourcing required for such articles. If you have created any other MVC recipients who reached the rank of brigadier, I would be happy to help you with them. Just let me know? Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:35, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Koushik Pain, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Zoodino (talk) 16:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Honourpoint.in

G'day Siddsg, www.honourpoint.in is a memorial site, not a reliable source. Please stop using it. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:27, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please work to gain consensus on talk page rather than reverting

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ayurveda; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 15:35, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pandurang Salunkhe

The article Pandurang Salunkhe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zoodino (talk) 15:52, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mohinder Singh (Soldier)

The article Mohinder Singh (Soldier) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zoodino (talk) 15:58, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bishan Singh (soldier)

The article Bishan Singh (soldier) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zoodino (talk) 15:59, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creating Articles not meeting Wikipedia Guidelines

Hello Siddsg, Hope you are doing fine. I know that don't have a habit of replying messages on your talk page or following the constructive suggestions from your fellow editors. But I want you to please read, understand and implement User_talk:Siddsg#Maha_Vir_Chakra_recipients. If you keep creating articles violating Wikipedia guidelines, the deletions are inevitable. So I would recommend you to stick to Wikipedia guidelines. Happy editing ! Zoodino (talk) 16:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Zoodino: I have read it and don't recall creating article after that message. Siddsg (talk) 17:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Siddsg:, That's good that you have already read it and are following it. But I would recommend you two more things:

Try to reply/acknowledge messages on your talk page (even in brief/one word), so the others know that you have understood their concerns.
If you have read User_talk:Siddsg#Maha_Vir_Chakra_recipients and agree to this, I recommend that you start cleaning up your articles yourself according to this. Zoodino (talk) 05:39, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overcats

Hi, are you aware of WP:Overcategorisation? I may be missing something but it seems to me that almost all your categorising of late has been inappropriate and will need to be reverted. - Sitush (talk) 14:55, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please also familiarise yourself with the information at User:Sitush/Common#Castelists. I have just had to empty the list at Chitrapur Saraswat Brahmin. - Sitush (talk) 15:24, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sitush: No I have no idea about that policy and I was in fact wonder why this category was missing. Now I realise why. Thanks for your note and the reverts. Siddsg (talk) 17:08, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chiman Singh

The article Chiman Singh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zoodino (talk) 09:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joseph Pius Alfred Noronha

The article Joseph Pius Alfred Noronha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zoodino (talk) 09:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sugan Singh

The article Sugan Singh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zoodino (talk) 09:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rattan Nath Sharma

The article Rattan Nath Sharma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zoodino (talk) 09:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Drig Pal Singh

The article Drig Pal Singh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zoodino (talk) 09:34, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pradip Kumar Gour

The article Pradip Kumar Gour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zoodino (talk) 09:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ved Prakash Ghai

The article Ved Prakash Ghai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zoodino (talk) 09:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vijay Kumar Berry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vijay Kumar Berry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Kumar Berry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 16:23, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Ayurveda

In this edit to Talk:Ayurveda, you made two claims that were patently untrue. That is behaviour unfitting civilised debate, particularly on an article subject to discretionary sanctions. I would like you to re-examine your statement and the two links, and to strike the untruths (the third part is true - the third link is the same as the first). If you fail to do so, I will impose sanctions against you in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator. --RexxS (talk) 14:28, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@RexxS: As a clearly WP:INVOLVED admin who has edited both main article[1] and talk page like an involved editor[2][3] you are not allowed to do it. Siddsg (talk) 14:45, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I assure you I have taken part in no dispute regarding Ayurveda which is what is required to make an admin involved. Nevertheless, if you prefer, I'll take your behaviour to WP:AE, where I'm confident that the other uninvolved admins will form the same conclusion as I did. Your choice. --RexxS (talk) 15:49, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've filed a report at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement #Siddsg. --RexxS (talk) 21:10, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 328: / Line 328: @@
 :{{ping|RexxS}} As a clearly [[WP:INVOLVED]] admin who has edited both main article[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=613726210] and talk page like an involved editor[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=614257065][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=613723901] you are not allowed to do it. [[User:Siddsg|Siddsg]] ([[User talk:Siddsg#top|talk]]) 14:45, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 :: I assure you I have taken part in no dispute regarding Ayurveda which is what is required to make an admin [[WP:INVOLVED|involved]]. Nevertheless, if you prefer, I'll take your behaviour to [[WP:AE]], where I'm confident that the other uninvolved admins will form the same conclusion as I did. Your choice. --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 15:49, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
+::: I've filed a report at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement #Siddsg]]. --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 21:10, 20 July 2020 (UTC)