User talk:Sitush

... or panic madly and freak out?

Have you come here to rant at me? It is water off a duck's back.

New Articles

Hi Sitush. Would you mind taking a look at List of Prime Ministerial trips made by Narendra Modi and Sushma Swaraj's tenure as External Affairs Minister which most likely do not qualify to be stand alone articles. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 14:47, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Utter trivia, but then most lists are. - Sitush (talk) 17:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Request for edits in vellala wiki page

Hi I need to add this content on vellala wiki page.

page 110 and 111 , Ancient to Medieval South Indian Society in Transition ,Noboru Karashima. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/ancient-to-medieval-south-indian-society-in-transition-9780198063124?cc=us&lang=en&

he says "The Second Point I wish to add here for future discussion concerns the caste system based on hierarchy .These Thirty or Fourty years Scholars have been discussing the issue of caste hierarchy,Concentrating their arguments on the question of which of the two,Brahmanas or the King(Kshatriya),occupied the pinnacle of the hierarchy , or which of the two, religion or politics ,played crucial role in maintaining social order in traditional India,by quoting A.M . Hocart and/or Louis Dumont , it seems to be more important ,however , To realize the independence of the two, Brahmana and King, or Religious and the Political , if we consider empirically the function of the so-called caste hierarchy.In the Long course of Indian History , the opposition between the allies of Brahmana and King(Kshtriyas or dominant caste) as rulers on the one hand,and the others groups(classified theoretically as Vaishya or sudra ) as the ruled on the other,has had much significance in society ,Though no communities properly called Kshatriyas have existed in south India, we are able to regard the Vellalas , Who were the dominant caste , as having played the role of Kshatriya in ancient and medieval Tamil Country, A good example of Brahmana/Vellala coordination can be seen in the Thirukkachchur incription, quoted above , contrasting the (good) behaviour of Brahmana and Vellala with the (lowly) behaviour of the lower jatis and missing the former . The best example of the conforntation between the Brahmanas/Vellalas allies and other communities organized as idankai and valankai may be found in the revolt inscriptions of the fifteenth century referred to above"

Request to wiki editor to add this info into wiki page of vellala — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.222.186.175 (talk) 15:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Observer access?

Sitush, do you have access to The Observer archives dating back to 1989, and in particular this article? Context. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 21:58, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your talk page proved to be of value even in your absense, since User:NQ emailed me the article. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

When you have some time?

Sitush, you were such a big help when I did my Blitzkid page. To be honest, if I knew then what I do now, I would've taken a path of less resistance to publishing in the first place! But because I met with those obstacles, and certainly in good part due to your support and knowledge, it got done and is a much better article for it.

I am trying to redeem an article by a similar band called The Cryptkeeper Five. It was a little stub that has been up for years (not mine originally) but has been nominated for deletion a few days ago. I am trying to help it b/c I believe the subject is notable (and naturally, I am a fan of them). So, since I jumped aboard I have messed it up in terms of NPOV, and have inserted some clumsy sections. But I hae a singular mission: to establish notability. I can improve its style and tone over time, but I have a week to establish notability if I've understood correctly.

So, if you have any pointers... I am aware of it's flaws (I have used some references that might be even dodgier than the previous article), but any advice is appreciated. :) Keithramone33 (talk) 23:12, 23 March 2015 (UTC)Keithramone33

I am not around here much at the moment and, as you know, I'm wary of sources for popular culture. I have just glanced at the article and there are a lot of blogs etc in there. I would suggest not adding any further blog type sources and instead concentrate on finding "hard" sources - maybe try newspapers.com or something like that for concert/record reviews?

I doubt that the article will be deleted because there are a few half-decent sources in there. But it does need work and that will likely take more than a week. If it is deleted then you could ask for the deleted version to be userfied so that you can try to improve it. Userfication means that the thing would be put into a subpage of your own userspace - it would not form a part of the public encyclopaedia but could be moved back into mainspace when you have resolved whatever the problems were that caused the deletion.

As previously, you need to tread carefully because of your fan status. - Sitush (talk) 07:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you Sitush. I did find a small handful of newspapers and such, and have included them. I guess my thoughts on the weaker sources was that I am not using them to assert controversial details, or to form the basis of my notability argument, but rather, you know, to flesh out the article :)

I agree that it needs work! Thank you or your continued help.Keithramone33 (talk) 17:19, 24 March 2015 (UTC)Keithramone33

Listen Sitush

Hi sitush please donot edit reddy — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrSachinReddyapolo (talk • contribs) 05:52, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

A Request by helpless brahmin

Dear sitush sir please defend the truth i am a kaashyap gotra kanyakubj brahmin.its all true about bhooinhar brahmins.please sir use sense ,please defend the truth.yow are powerfull at wikipedia you can edit anyway.but you are playing with truth.i cannot do anything but for god please defend the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahultewaritewari (talk • contribs) 11:00, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

sitush sir

i have no references about it but i am kanyakubj brahmin.it is all true that ancestors of kaashyap gotra kanyakubj brahmins are Zamindar bhuinhar brahmins. we are also bhuinhar brahmins. not all kanyakubj brahmins but only kaashyap gotta kanyakubjs are bhuinhar brahmins — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahultewaritewari (talk • contribs) 06:08, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

See WP:V. I am afraid that we cannot accept statements that lack sources, except in the most elementary circumstances. And nothing related to caste communities is elementary other than that they are human beings. - Sitush (talk) 06:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

sir i am kaashayap gotra tri (three) pravar kanyakubj brahmin , Madhya nadi kuldev Vishnu ,,mul madarpur zamindar bhuinhar brahmin aspad tiwari

Jolly good for you. It makes no difference here, though. - Sitush (talk) 06:53, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

you are so cute

you are so cute and lovely — Preceding unsigned comment added by Controllergenralofdelhi (talk • contribs) 03:31, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

I can't wait to see how you respond to this. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:35, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Ditto. --AmritasyaPutra^T 05:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Tito --Tito Dutta (talk) 05:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

You should be banned for that bad pun Mr. Dutta. Hmmm, somebody obviously hasn't seen Sitush before. Tito is the one who looks dreamy, especially when dancing. mmmm..... Bgwhite (talk) 06:07, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Ah, unexpected Wiki-love... That's good! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:35, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

@NeilN: I'm lost for words! - Sitush (talk) 09:08, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Delhi

Delhi is capital of india — Preceding unsigned comment added by Controllergenralofdelhi (talk • contribs) 04:10, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Wedding in Lover's Point

Have a cup of coffee — Preceding unsigned comment added by Controllergenralofdelhi (talk • contribs) 04:15, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Golla caste

Dear sitush, why did you remove all of my newly added content regarding golla caste? 04:59, 27 March 2015 TCSadvocate

Someone who was editing while not logged into a user account had restored a very poor version of the article. You then amended that restoration with still more poor content. Wikipedia requires that pretty much every statement made here is verifiable by reference to reliable sources, which was not the case in this instance. - Sitush (talk) 07:46, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

you are again removing content

Please slow down — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohinisinghaliya (talk • contribs) 15:32, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

@Rohinisinghaliya: I am not the one who is rushing. You need to read WP:V and WP:RS, not to mention WP:COI and WP:NPOV. Carry on as you are doing and you will find yourself with an enforced break when you could read those things but it would be better if you did so now. - Sitush (talk) 15:54, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

@Sitush: but article was fully sorced you knowRohinisinghaliya (talk) 15:57, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

according to WP:V the articles had got enough sorces Rohinisinghaliya (talk) 15:59, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Has it fuck. Even the ones that are present are not reliable. - Sitush (talk) 16:00, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Here on Wikipedia, everyone is expected to be polite. Unfortunately, I noticed that a comment you posted wasn't very nice. You are allowed to criticize editors constructively, but please remember to still be friendly. Wikipedia would appreciate it. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohinisinghaliya (talk • contribs) 16:35, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

"Has it fuck?" Not an ideal response to a question from another user about your edit. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) There is no question mark. - NQ (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Liz, you need to check the recent talk page history and, yes, NQ is correct. - Sitush (talk) 16:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

• Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rohinisinghaliya is a sign that this user isn't worth taking seriously... Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:28, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

I'm not taking them seriously but they are being disruptive and, as you are aware, I get this sort of crap day in, day out, both here and on article talk pages etc. I know that people say you have to have a thick hide to be an admin but there are an awful lot of admins who don't get the abuse etc to the extent I get it. I'm no saint: every now and again I lose my temper. It's just a wonder that it is quite so infrequent - comments such as that from Liz above don't exactly improve it. - Sitush (talk) 16:37, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

• I'm aware of that Sitush, my comment was more aimed at some of the other editors whom apparently are taking them seriously. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

• Got it. I need to find my one-gallon teapot. - Sitush (talk) 16:46, 28 March 2015 (UTC)