Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant
| Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant | |
|---|---|
.jpg){kind=spacer} Comanche Peak's twin containment domes in August 2017 | |
 | |
| Country | United States |
| Location | Somervell County, near Glen Rose, Texas |
| Coordinates | 32°17′54″N 97°47′6″W / 32.29833°N 97.78500°W |
| Status | Operational |
| Construction began | December 19, 1974 |
| Commission date | Unit 1: August 13, 1990 Unit 2: August 3, 1993 |
| Owner | Luminant |
| Operator | Luminant Generation Company LLC[a] |
| Nuclear power station | |
| Reactor type | PWR |
| Reactor supplier | Westinghouse |
| Cooling source | Squaw Creek Reservoir |
| Thermal capacity | 2 × 3612 MWth |
| Power generation | |
| Units operational | 1 × 1218 MW 1 × 1207 MW |
| Make and model | WH 4-loop (DRYAMB) |
| Units planned | 2 × 1700 MW |
| Nameplate capacity | 2425 MW |
| Capacity factor | 95.1% (2018) 88.40% (lifetime) |
| Annual net output | 19,356 GWh (2021) |
| External links | |
| Website | www |
| Commons | Related media on Commons |
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant is located in Somervell County, Texas. The nuclear power plant is located 40 miles (64 km) southwest of Ft. Worth and about 60 miles (97 km) southwest of Dallas. It relies on nearby Squaw Creek Reservoir for cooling water. The plant has about 1,300 employees and is operated by Luminant Generation, a subsidiary of Vistra Corp.
The Engineer of Record is Gibbs & Hill, Inc. of New York, New York.[citation needed]
Construction of the two Westinghouse pressurized water reactors began in 1974. Unit 1, originally rated at 1,084 MWe, came online on April 17, 1990. Its current, 40-year operating license is valid until February 8, 2030. Unit 2, 1,124 MWe, followed on April 6, 1993 and is licensed to operate until February 2, 2033 when it has to renew its license. As of 2023[update], Unit 2 was the fourth-to-last power reactor to come online in the United States, followed only by Units 1 and 2 at Watts Bar and Unit 3 at Vogtle.
In June 2008, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approved a request to increase the generating capacity of Units 1 and 2 by approximately 4.5% each. Luminant Generation Co. implemented the changes during refueling outages. Unit 1 was uprated in autumn 2008 with a capacity increase of approximately 1,210 to 1,259 MWe and Unit 2, the capacity of which rose from an estimated 1,208 to 1,245 MWe, was uprated in autumn 2009.[1]
Proposed units 3 and 4
On September 19, 2008, Luminant filed an application with the NRC for a Combined Construction and Operating License (COL) for two new reactors.[2] The reactor design selected is the US version of the 1,700 MWe Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor (US-APWR), developed by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI). The project is a joint venture, with Luminant owning 88 percent and 12 percent owned by MHI.[3] Luminant did not release an estimate of the project's cost, but CEO David Campbell said Luminant would try to build its new reactors at the low end of current industry estimates, which he said range from $2,500 to $6,000 a kilowatt — $8.5 billion to $20.4 billion for a 3,400 MW plant.[4]
Some environmental and anti-nuclear organizations and individuals opposed the plant expansion, citing environmental, public safety and cost concerns. These included the Sustainable Energy and Economic Development Coalition, Public Citizen and state representative Lon Burnam.[5]
As of November 2013[update], expansion had been suspended due a natural gas boom dramatically lowering power prices in Texas, and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries suspending development of its reactor design to focus on restarting its reactors in Japan. The Texas power generation company did not withdraw its application to the NRC entirely, leaving open the possibility that it might eventually expand.[6][7]
Electricity Production
Comanche Peak generated 19,687 GWh in 2022.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Annual (Total) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 1,658,989 | 1,512,259 | 1,438,872 | 974,914 | 1,670,269 | 1,601,768 | 1,597,727 | 1,313,115 | 1,599,085 | 1,667,805 | 1,614,299 | 1,673,163 | 18,322,265 |
| 2002 | 1,677,259 | 1,516,267 | 1,626,072 | 793,729 | 1,467,893 | 1,554,584 | 1,627,411 | 1,637,057 | 1,514,897 | 838,125 | 955,466 | 1,359,642 | 16,568,402 |
| 2003 | 1,704,206 | 1,539,389 | 1,495,109 | 1,643,055 | 1,156,176 | 1,623,908 | 1,185,893 | 1,654,502 | 1,620,510 | 943,762 | 1,608,609 | 1,573,824 | 17,748,943 |
| 2004 | 1,703,426 | 1,593,931 | 1,574,855 | 822,909 | 1,546,968 | 1,654,375 | 1,699,286 | 1,702,337 | 1,649,910 | 1,714,801 | 1,668,615 | 1,731,992 | 19,063,405 |
| 2005 | 1,731,092 | 1,510,072 | 1,570,916 | 860,084 | 1,725,904 | 1,677,833 | 1,722,316 | 1,723,075 | 1,671,502 | 1,076,389 | 1,415,196 | 1,758,821 | 18,443,200 |
| 2006 | 1,756,267 | 1,588,082 | 1,758,417 | 1,692,314 | 1,747,556 | 1,681,885 | 1,730,175 | 1,730,668 | 1,678,575 | 1,081,662 | 1,692,415 | 1,757,993 | 19,896,009 |
| 2007 | 1,752,326 | 1,445,856 | 875,777 | 1,083,462 | 1,741,074 | 1,676,951 | 1,723,691 | 1,719,211 | 1,667,647 | 1,734,026 | 1,690,907 | 1,734,819 | 18,845,747 |
| 2008 | 1,750,639 | 1,553,738 | 1,619,642 | 1,123,261 | 1,738,880 | 1,674,303 | 1,722,328 | 1,720,897 | 1,554,964 | 1,260,943 | 1,726,017 | 1,789,009 | 19,234,621 |
| 2009 | 1,790,046 | 1,616,782 | 1,785,753 | 1,729,079 | 1,671,072 | 1,712,524 | 1,759,341 | 1,761,586 | 1,712,466 | 1,079,817 | 1,699,598 | 1,823,405 | 20,141,469 |
| 2010 | 1,551,018 | 1,644,660 | 1,816,745 | 1,010,264 | 1,808,951 | 1,707,449 | 1,788,500 | 1,780,318 | 1,733,104 | 1,794,245 | 1,755,326 | 1,817,887 | 20,208,467 |
| 2011 | 1,767,217 | 1,641,021 | 1,797,420 | 999,644 | 1,657,829 | 1,726,564 | 1,488,527 | 1,730,579 | 1,737,580 | 1,164,244 | 1,752,151 | 1,819,785 | 19,282,561 |
| 2012 | 1,820,124 | 1,703,204 | 1,814,364 | 1,615,468 | 1,805,610 | 1,737,793 | 1,788,366 | 1,787,343 | 1,699,952 | 1,055,012 | 1,250,656 | 1,819,032 | 19,896,924 |
| 2013 | 1,821,067 | 1,642,479 | 1,767,174 | 1,111,407 | 1,812,029 | 1,742,454 | 1,753,829 | 1,787,719 | 1,731,612 | 1,806,926 | 1,687,767 | 1,822,677 | 20,487,140 |
| 2014 | 1,688,483 | 1,635,263 | 1,742,010 | 947,757 | 1,812,716 | 1,744,554 | 1,793,530 | 1,791,097 | 1,737,669 | 993,239 | 930,297 | 1,819,161 | 18,635,776 |
| 2015 | 1,821,718 | 1,644,082 | 1,816,908 | 1,752,625 | 1,791,649 | 1,694,367 | 1,790,555 | 1,785,184 | 1,733,435 | 963,894 | 1,340,670 | 1,819,037 | 19,954,124 |
| 2016 | 1,818,923 | 1,701,488 | 1,801,394 | 1,750,570 | 905,232 | 1,717,508 | 1,788,999 | 1,787,685 | 1,740,747 | 1,802,486 | 1,752,429 | 1,817,681 | 20,385,142 |
| 2017 | 1,831,666 | 1,651,441 | 1,791,628 | 910,067 | 1,605,288 | 952,824 | 905,519 | 1,439,095 | 1,629,164 | 1,095,468 | 1,381,945 | 1,805,820 | 16,999,925 |
| 2018 | 1,817,674 | 1,640,480 | 1,821,539 | 1,764,711 | 1,808,860 | 1,741,512 | 1,777,737 | 1,729,234 | 1,724,699 | 1,798,587 | 1,752,275 | 1,120,799 | 20,498,107 |
| 2019 | 1,239,484 | 1,635,692 | 1,742,775 | 1,343,660 | 980,849 | 1,735,124 | 1,779,949 | 1,773,839 | 1,719,884 | 1,795,730 | 1,750,631 | 1,807,093 | 19,304,710 |
| 2020 | 1,730,736 | 1,693,116 | 1,799,675 | 1,405,355 | 1,420,587 | 1,725,499 | 1,774,420 | 1,771,967 | 1,723,689 | 1,139,493 | 1,489,785 | 1,805,626 | 19,479,948 |
| 2021 | 1,807,655 | 1,633,289 | 1,769,116 | 1,716,490 | 1,793,889 | 1,368,501 | 1,734,877 | 1,768,640 | 1,714,437 | 962,602 | 1,284,678 | 1,802,079 | 19,356,253 |
| 2022 | 1,805,139 | 1,631,747 | 1,786,508 | 1,132,844 | 1,282,368 | 1,721,181 | 1,763,998 | 1,765,942 | 1,479,250 | 1,774,815 | 1,740,840 | 1,802,438 | 19,687,070 |
| 2023 | 1,803,160 | 1,630,123 | 1,793,431 | 1,512,237 | 965,395 | 7,704,346 |
Surrounding population
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of 10 miles (16 km), concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about 50 miles (80 km), concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity.[9]
The 2010 U.S. population within 10 miles (16 km) of Comanche Peak was 30,653, an increase of 44.1 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. The 2010 U.S. population within 50 miles (80 km) was 1,755,528, an increase of 22.9 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Fort Worth (41 miles to city center).[10]
Seismic risk
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Comanche Peak was 1 in 250,000, according to an NRC study published in August 2010.[11][12]
Reactor data
The Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant consists of two operational reactors, two additional units are planned.
| Reactor unit[13] | Reactor type | Capacity(MW) | Construction started | Electricity grid connection | Commercial operation | Shutdown | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | Gross | ||||||
| Comanche Peak-1 | Westinghouse 4-loop | 1209 | 1259 | 19.12.1974 | 24.04.1990 | 13.08.1990 | |
| Comanche Peak-2 | 1197 | 1250 | 19.12.1974 | 09.04.1993 | 03.08.1993 | ||
| Comanche Peak-3 (planned)[14] | US-APWR | 1700 | ? | ||||
| Comanche Peak-4 (planned)[15] | |||||||
See also
Notes
- ^ Technically it's unclear if the operator is Luminant Generation Company LLC or Vistra Operations Company LLC, as the NRC lists the plant's operator as TEX Operations Company LLC, which was the former name of Vistra Operations Company LLC, yet PRIS lists Luminant Generation Company LLC. However since Luminant is indirectly owned by Vistra, it seems to be a moot point, so the operator listed is the one from PRIS (which is more likely to be up to date).
References
- ^ "Comanche Peak to increase output". World Nuclear News. 2008-06-30. Retrieved 2008-09-19.
- ^ "Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 3 and 4 Application". U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). 2008-09-19. Retrieved 2008-09-19.
- ^ "Luminant seeks permission to expand nuclear power plant". Dallas Business Journal. 2008-09-19. Retrieved 2008-09-19.
- ^ O'Grady, Eileen (2008-09-19). "Luminant seeks new reactor, 3rd Texas filing". Reuters. Retrieved 2008-09-19.
- ^ Hearing today involves opponents to new reactors at Comanche Peak
- ^ Expansion of Comanche Peak nuclear power plant suspended
- ^ "Mitsubishi delays certification of APWR". World Nuclear News. 12 November 2013. Retrieved 15 November 2013.
- ^ "Electricity Data Browser". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 2023-01-07.
- ^ "NRC: Backgrounder on Emergency Preparedness for Nuclear Power Plants". Archived from the original on 2006-10-02. Retrieved 2013-12-13.
- ^ Bill Dedman, Nuclear neighbors: Population rises near US reactors, NBC News, April 14, 2011 http://www.nbcnews.com/id/42555888 Accessed May 1, 2011.
- ^ Bill Dedman, "What are the odds? US nuke plants ranked by quake risk," NBC News, March 17, 2011 http://www.nbcnews.com/id/42103936 Accessed April 19, 2011.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-05-25. Retrieved 2011-04-19.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ Power Reactor Information System of the IAEA: „United States of America: Nuclear Power Reactors- Alphabetic“ Archived June 4, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Power Reactor Information System of the IAEA: „Nuclear Power Reactor Details - COMANCHE PEAK-3“
- ^ Power Reactor Information System of the IAEA: „Nuclear Power Reactor Details - COMANCHE PEAK-4“
External links
- "Comanche Peak 1". NRC. 2008-02-14. Retrieved 2008-09-19.
- "Comanche Peak 2". NRC. 2008-02-14. Retrieved 2008-09-19.
- "Comanche Peak". U.S. Nuclear Plants. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Retrieved 2008-09-19.
