Jump to content

Ulmus × hollandica 'Serpentina'

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PedjaNbg (talk | contribs) at 21:50, 9 September 2019 (Added free to read link in citations with OAbot #oabot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Ulmus × hollandica 'Serpentina'
Tree labelled Ulmus hollandica 'Serpentina', Denmark, 1965
Hybrid parentageU. glabra × U. minor
Cultivar'Serpentina'

The putative hybrid cultivar Ulmus × hollandica 'Serpentina' is an elm of unknown provenance and doubtful status. Henry identified it as intermediate between U. glabra and U. minor,[1] a view accepted by Bean[2] and by Melville, who believed that the specimens at Kew bearing the name 'Serpentina' were U. glabra "introgressed by U. carpinifolia" [: U. minor] and were similar to but "distinct from 'Camperdownii'".[3]

Koch had listed an U. serpentina in 1872,[4] and an U. montana serpentina was marketed in the late 19th century by the Baudriller nursery of Angers,[5] the Späth nursery of Berlin,[6][7][8] and the Ulrich nursery of Warsaw.[9] In Späth catalogues between c.1890 and 1920, however, though 'Serpentina' appears, 'Camperdownii' is absent; by 1930 'Camperdownii' appears but 'Serpentina' is absent. This suggests that 'Serpentina' may have been a continental name for 'Camperdownii', and that Späth dropped the name 'Serpentina' c.1930 in favour of 'Camperdownii'. Elwes and Henry's failure to mention the serpentining branches of 'Camperdownii' may have contributed to the impression of two different trees. In this omission they were followed by Bean (1925),[10] Green (1964), Hillier (1972– 2002),[11] Krüssmann(1976),[12] and White (2003),[13] the first four of whom, like Elwes and Henry, list 'Serpentina' as a cultivar distinct from 'Camperdownii'.

The ultimate form of 'Camperdownii' depends on such factors as latitude and location, on what part of the parent tree the cuttings come from, on the 'stock' on which it is grafted, and on possible continuing mutation. Specimens may therefore vary in form,[14] which might account for Henry and Melville's "hybrid" 'Serpentina'.

Henry, quoting Koch, said that 'Serpentina' was sold in nurseries as the Parasol Elm,[1] which was distinguished from Ulmus campestris pendula by having larger leaves.[15] Both 'Serpentina' and the Scampston Elm were sometimes referred to as U. americana pendula.[16][17] (Other European elms described as 'American' by various nurseries include 'Vegeta',[18] 'Lutescens',[19] and 'Nana'.[20])

Description

Baudriller (1880) described Ulmus montana serpentina as "a curious variety which, top-grafted, forms by the entanglement of its vigorous branches a superb parasol", and Henry (1913) as "a small tree with curved and twisted pendulous branches, a dense pyramidal or globose crown, and leaves and branchlets similar to those of U. × hollandica 'Major' ".[1][21] An U. serpentina was described in the journal Nature in 1918: "The branches are curiously contorted and reflexed, while all the shoots from one to three years old are pendulous rods,which, with the beautiful foliage, form an exterior covering reaching to the ground".[22] Krüssman, who listed a 'Serpentina' under U. glabra, described it (1984) as a weeping elm with "twisted corkscrew-like branches" and leaves "like those of U. 'Camperdownii'". Like Henry, he makes no mention of contorted branching in his description of 'Camperdowni'.[23]

Pests and diseases

No cultivars labelled 'Serpentina' are known to have any resistance to Dutch elm disease.

Cultivation

The journal Nature reported in July 1918 "a remarkable elm of the variety known as Ulmus serpentina, apparently about sixty years old, vigorously growing in a Croydon garden".[22] "Sixty years old" would pre-date the first known reference to a 'Serpentina', but would tally with an early 'Camperdownii' planting. Späth's U. montana serpentina was planted at Kew in 1896. Henry, though he describes Kew's 'Serpentina', calling it "U. major var. serpentina Henry", makes, unusually, no mention of a Kew 'Camperdownii'. Späth's U. montana serpentina was planted in 1897 at the Dominion Arboretum, Ottawa, Canada, which, though it contained some eighty elm cultivars by the turn of the century, had no specimen labelled 'Camperdownii'.[24] Three specimens supplied by the Späth nursery to the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh in 1902 as U. montana serpentina (see 'External links' below) are now assumed by the Garden to have been 'Camperdownii',[25] the Garden having no separate accession record for its 'Camperdownii', a sizeable tree by the 1970s (felled in the 1980s).[26] A specimen of U. montana serpentina obtained from Späth before 1914, and planted in 1916, stood in the Ryston Hall arboretum, Norfolk,[27] in the early 20th century.[28] A 1920 photograph taken at Hortus Botanicus, Leiden, showing a weeping tree, is captioned Ulmus scabra [: U. glabra Huds.] Serpentina.[29] Its identification by the arboretum as a wych cultivar points to Camperdown Elm.

A Camperdown Elm that stands (2016) in Jevington, Sussex, planted to commemorate the end of the First World War, is described in surviving notes from the time as a 'Serpentine Elm', brought back from Berlin in 1913 by Captain Loftus Henry Canton of the parish, and after the War planted in the churchyard.[30][31][32] Its Berlin provenance suggests that it was Späth's U. montana serpentina.

Elms called 'Serpentina' still survive in Eastern Europe. A 'Serpentina' (Template:Lang-lv) appears on a Latvian horticultural list.[33] A Russian list contains separate entries for 'Camperdownii' and 'Serpentina'.[34] The introduction of a 'Serpentina' to Australasia has not been recorded.

Accessions

Europe

References

  1. ^ a b c Elwes, Henry John; Henry, Augustine (1913). The Trees of Great Britain & Ireland. Vol. 7. p. 1884.
  2. ^ Bean, W. J. (1981). Trees and shrubs hardy in Great Britain, 7th edition. Murray, England
  3. ^ Green, Peter Shaw (1964). "Registration of cultivar names in Ulmus". Arnoldia. 24 (6–8). Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University: 41–80. Retrieved 16 February 2017.
  4. ^ Koch, Dendrologie, 2, pt.1, p.417
  5. ^ BaudrillerÉtablissement d'Horticulture (1880). Catalogue général descriptif et raisonné des arbres fruitiers, forestiers & d'ornement cultivés dans l'établissement. Angers. p. 116.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  6. ^ Späth, L., Catalogue 79 (1890-91; Berlin), p.114
  7. ^ Katalog (PDF). Vol. 108. Berlin, Germany: L. Späth Baumschulenweg. 1902–1903. pp. 132–133.
  8. ^ Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh accessions list of 1902.
  9. ^ Ulrich, C. (1894), Katalog Drzew i Krezewow, C. Ulrich, Rok 1893-94, Warszawa
  10. ^ Bean, W. J.(1925) Trees and shrubs hardy in Great Britain, 4th edition, Murray, London
  11. ^ Harold Hillier, The Hillier Manual of Trees and Shrubs (1972; revised to 2002)
  12. ^ Krüssman, Gerd, Manual of Cultivated Broad-Leaved Trees & Shrubs (1976, trans 1984 vol. 3)
  13. ^ J. White, D. More, Cassell's Trees of Britain and Northern Ireland (London 2003)
  14. ^ Information from RBGE.
  15. ^ "Methods of propagation (the limes and elms)". The Gardeners' Chronicle. 19: 699. 1896.
  16. ^ Koch, Karl (1872). Dendrologie; Bäume, Sträucher und Halbsträucher, welche in Mittel- und Nord- Europa im Freien kultivirt werden. Vol. 2. p. 417.
  17. ^ Anthony waterer's catalogue. 1880. p. 20.
  18. ^ Arboretum et Fruticetum Britannicum, 3: 1398, 1404
  19. ^ Elwes, Henry John; Henry, Augustine (1913). The Trees of Great Britain & Ireland. Vol. 7. p. 1868.
  20. ^ General catalogue, 1904 : choice hardy trees, shrubs, evergreens, roses, herbaceous plants, fruits, etc. New York: Frederick W. Kelsey. 1904. p. 18.
  21. ^ Hilliers' Manual of Trees & Shrubs. (1977). David & Charles, Newton Abbot, UK.
  22. ^ a b Shrubsole, W.H. (11 July 1918). "Weeping Forms of Elm" (PDF). Nature. 101 (2541): 365. doi:10.1038/101365b0.
  23. ^ Krüssman, Gerd, Manual of Cultivated Broad-Leaved Trees & Shrubs (1984 vol. 3)
  24. ^ Catalogue of the trees and shrubs in the arboretum and botanic gardens at the central experimental farm (2 ed.). 1899. p. 76.
  25. ^ Clouston, B., & Stansfield, K., eds. After the Elm (London 1979)
  26. ^ Photographs of the RBGE tree in Krüssman (1984) and in Clouston & Stansfield, After the Elm (1979)
  27. ^ rystonhall.co.uk/
  28. ^ Ryston Hall Arboretum catalogue. c. 1920. pp. 13–14.
  29. ^ molenzicht.net, Treurbomen. Slangvormige treuriep (Ulmus Scabra Serpentina) in den Hortus te Leiden, accessdate: August 19, 2016
  30. ^ Johnson, O. (1998). The Sussex Tree Book. Pomegranate Press, ISBN 0-9533493-0-6
  31. ^ The Jevington churchyard elm, seafordnaturalhistory.org.uk
  32. ^ Jevington Elm, flickr.com/photos/debbcollins/3528768312/in/photostream/ flickr.com/photos/debbcollins/3528762710/in/photostream/
  33. ^ dārzkopības portāls: Parastā goba 'Serpantina' , accessdate: August 19, 2016
  34. ^ Ulmus glabra 'Serpantina' [:Serpentina], zalenieki.lv/ru/lapu-koki-un-krumi?sortby=T-U
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ulmus_×_hollandica_%27Serpentina%27&oldid=914877069"