Cum proxime

Pope Pius XI instituted a new rule for setting the date for the start of a papal conclave to elect a new pope by promulgating the document Cum proxime on 1 March 1922, less than a month after his own election. The four non-European cardinals had not participated in the conclave that elected him in February. Three of them arrived too late and one did not attempt the journey. With Cum proxime, Pius XI extended the time between the death of a pope and the start of the conclave to increase the likelihood that cardinals from distant locations could reach Rome in time to participate.

Like other documents issued on the pope's own authority, that is, a motu proprio, it is known by the opening words of its original Latin text. Pius begins by saying that he has been considering the conclave that elected him, and his opening words "Cum proxime" mean roughly since the recent.

Background

Traveling to attend at a conclave had long posed a challenge to cardinals outside of Italy. On occasion the cardinals based in or near Rome entered a conclave hoping to elect a pope before all their colleagues joined them.^{[citation needed]} Wartime constraints allowed only 34 of 45 cardinals to attend the conclave of 1799-1800 in Venice. Despite dramatic improvements in transportation in the 19th century, the appointment of cardinals outside Europe presented a new challenge. In 1878 Cardinal John McCloskey arrived from New York five days after the start of the conclave, three days after it concluded.^[1]^[a] In 1903 Cardinal James Gibbons of Baltimore was able to attend only because the death of Pope Leo XIII was long anticipated.^[3]^[b] That same year Cardinal Patrick Francis Moran of Sydney left Australia on 9 July^[4] and was not expected to reach Rome until August 20.^[5] In 1914, when the conclave began on 31 August, Cardinals Gibbons of Baltimore and William O'Connell of Boston were not expected to arrive in Rome before 1 November ^[6] and Cardinal Louis-Nazaire Bégin of Quebec even later.^[7] In 1922, Cardinal Joaquim Arcoverde de Albuquerque Cavalcanti of Rio de Janeiro knew he could not reach Rome in time for the conclave and did not attempt the journey. The other three non-European cardinals–again O'Connell and Bégin as in 1914, as well as Denis Dougherty of Philadelphia–did not arrive in time to participate in the conclave. O'Connell arrived at the Vatican on 6 February "at the moment the new Pope was blessing the multitude".^[8]^[c] Cardinals Dougherty and Bégin never expected to arrive in time,^[10] learned the outcome of the conclave while still at sea,^[8] and reached Rome on 9 February.^[11]

In 1922, the College of Cardinals debated whether to start the conclave as required after allowing ten days to elapse after the death of Benedict XV. Two-thirds of the non-Italian cardinals and some of the Italians wanted to delay the start until at least one of the Americans arrived. Cardinal János Csernoch of Hungary told the other cardinals that "America is a vital part of the Church. It will be calamitous to deny her participation in the election of the Pontiff. It will have a grave reaction among the American people; it will wound their pride and dignity." Cardinal Friedrich Gustav Piffl opposed proceeding without the Americans "for the sake of a technicality".^[11]^[d]

Cum proxime

Immediately following the conclave, the dispute about delaying the conclave to await the arrival of the Americans continued. On 8 February, four French cardinals, Louis Luçon of Rheims, Louis-Ernest Dubois of Paris, Pierre Andrieu of Bordeaux, and Louis-Joseph Maurin of Lyon, asked for changes to church law to allow for an indefinite delay to ensure participation by cardinals from North and South America. And Cardinal Pietro Gasparri, who had led the Italians in opposition to a delay, expressed support for some modification of the schedule.^[11]

On 28 February Pope Pius met with Cardinal O'Connell and said: "There will be no more racing 5,000 miles in a vain endeavor to reach Rome in time for a Conclave. The United States is too important to be ignored as she has been. I shall see to it that what happened at the last Conclave shall not occur again."^[14]

Pius XI issued new regulations in Cum proxime on 1 March 1922. He noted the experience of the conclave that elected him and that cardinals had requested modifications. In place of a fixed interval of ten days following the day the papacy becomes vacant, he set the start of the conclave at ten to fifteen days from the death of the pope and allowed the College of Cardinals, meeting in general congregation, to extend that to as long as eighteen days.^[9]^[15]

Later experience

When the next papal conclave took place in 1939, the College of Cardinals waited the maximum eighteen days^[16] and all 62 cardinals attended, including six from the Western Hemisphere.^[17] By the next conclave in 1958, the speed of travel matched the internationalization of the College. As one newspaper put it, "the Archbishop of New York can reach Rome today faster than the Archbishop of Palermo did a generation ago".^[18] Nevertheless, in 1975 Pope Paul VI allowed the College to extend the interval to as long as twenty days.^[19]

Notes

^ McCloskey sailed from New York on 9 February^[2] and reached Rome on 23 February.^[1]
^ He left from New York on 9 July^[4] and arrived so early that he remained in France waiting for Leo to die.^[3]
^ One observer, unidentified by the historian who provides his view, thought O'Connell "intentionally selected slow transport" to underscore both the need for more time and the importance of the U.S. to the Church.^[9]
^ The 53 cardinals who entered the conclave on 2 February, the eleventh day following the death of Benedict XV as required, were 31 Italians, five French, four Spanish, three German, 3 British, 2 Polish, 2 Austrian, one Hungarian, one Belgian and one Dutch.^[12]^[13]

References

^ ^a ^b "Miscellaneous Foreign Notes" (PDF). New York Times. 24 February 1878. Retrieved 15 November 2017.
^ "Departure of Cardinal M'Closkey" (PDF). New York Times. 10 February 1878. Retrieved 15 November 2017.
^ ^a ^b "Conclave of Cardinals to Meet August 1" (PDF). New York Times. 22 July 1903. Retrieved 15 November 2017.
^ ^a ^b "The Expected Conclave" (PDF). New York Times. 10 July 1903. Retrieved 15 November 2017.
^ "Sixty-Two Cardinals in Rome for Conclave" (PDF). New York Times. 30 July 1903. Retrieved 15 November 2017.
^ Chadwick, Owen (1998). A History of the Popes, 1830-1914. Oxford University Press. p. 336. Retrieved 13 November 2017.
^ Burkle-Young, Francis A. (2000). Papal Elections in the Age of Transition, 1878-1922. Lexington Books. p. 103. Retrieved 15 November 2017.
^ ^a ^b "Cardinal Ratti New Pope as Pius XI" (PDF). New York Times. 7 February 1922. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
^ ^a ^b Trythall, Marisa Patrulli (2010). "Pius XI and American Pragmatism". In Gallagher, Charles R.; Kertzer, David I.; Melloni, Alberto (eds.). Pius XI and America: Proceedings of the Brown University Conference. Lit Verlag. p. 28.
^ "Two Cardinals Sail" (PDF). New York Times. 29 January 1922. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
^ ^a ^b ^c "Italians Opposed Delaying Conclave" (PDF). New York Times. Associated Press. 10 February 1922. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
^ Aradi, Zsolt (1958). Pius XI: The Pope and the Man. New York: Hanover House. Retrieved 13 November 2017.^{[page needed]} Republished by Muriwai Books, 2017. Aradi counts one Italian too many and misses the Portuguese cardinal. He counts the Austrian serving as nuncio to Bavaria as Germany rather than Austrian.
^ Burkle-Young, Francis A. (2000). Papal Elections in the Age of Transition, 1878-1922. Lexington Books.^{[page needed]}
^ "Pontiff Says Conclave Must Wait for U.S." (PDF). New York Times. 1 March 1922. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
^ Pope Pius XI (1 March 1922). "Cum proxime" (Document) (in Italian). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. {{cite document}}: Unknown parameter |accessdate= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |url= ignored (help)
^ "Conclave to Elect Pope is Postponed to March 1" (PDF). New York Times. 11 February 1939. Retrieved 14 November 2017.
^ "Vatican Door Shut on 62 Cardinals as Conclave Opens to Elect Pope" (PDF). New York Times. 2 March 1939. Retrieved 14 November 2017.
^ "As the Catholic Church Prepares to Choose a New Leader" (PDF). New York Times. 12 October 1958. Retrieved 6 November 2017.
^ Pham, John-Peter (2004). Heirs of the Fisherman: Behind the Scenes of Papal Death and Succession. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199334827.^{[page needed]}

External links

Pope Pius XI (1 March 1922). "Cum proxime" (Document) (in Italian). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. {{cite document}}: Unknown parameter |accessdate= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |url= ignored (help)
Pope Pius XI (1 March 1922). "Cum proxime" (Document) (in Latin). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. {{cite document}}: Unknown parameter |access-date= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |url= ignored (help)

[3] McCloskey sailed from New York on 9 February^[2] and reached Rome on 23 February.^[1]

[6] He left from New York on 9 July^[4] and arrived so early that he remained in France waiting for Leo to die.^[3]

[12] One observer, unidentified by the historian who provides his view, thought O'Connell "intentionally selected slow transport" to underscore both the need for more time and the importance of the U.S. to the Church.^[9]

[17] The 53 cardinals who entered the conclave on 2 February, the eleventh day following the death of Benedict XV as required, were 31 Italians, five French, four Spanish, three German, 3 British, 2 Polish, 2 Austrian, one Hungarian, one Belgian and one Dutch.^[12]^[13]

[nyt18780224-1] "Miscellaneous Foreign Notes" (PDF). New York Times. 24 February 1878. Retrieved 15 November 2017.

[2] "Departure of Cardinal M'Closkey" (PDF). New York Times. 10 February 1878. Retrieved 15 November 2017.

[nyt19030722-4] "Conclave of Cardinals to Meet August 1" (PDF). New York Times. 22 July 1903. Retrieved 15 November 2017.

[nyt19030710-5] "The Expected Conclave" (PDF). New York Times. 10 July 1903. Retrieved 15 November 2017.

[7] "Sixty-Two Cardinals in Rome for Conclave" (PDF). New York Times. 30 July 1903. Retrieved 15 November 2017.

[8] Chadwick, Owen (1998). A History of the Popes, 1830-1914. Oxford University Press. p. 336. Retrieved 13 November 2017.

[burkle-9] Burkle-Young, Francis A. (2000). Papal Elections in the Age of Transition, 1878-1922. Lexington Books. p. 103. Retrieved 15 November 2017.

[nyt19220207-10] "Cardinal Ratti New Pope as Pius XI" (PDF). New York Times. 7 February 1922. Retrieved 1 November 2017.

[patrulli-11] Trythall, Marisa Patrulli (2010). "Pius XI and American Pragmatism". In Gallagher, Charles R.; Kertzer, David I.; Melloni, Alberto (eds.). Pius XI and America: Proceedings of the Brown University Conference. Lit Verlag. p. 28.

[13] "Two Cardinals Sail" (PDF). New York Times. 29 January 1922. Retrieved 1 November 2017.

[delay-14] "Italians Opposed Delaying Conclave" (PDF). New York Times. Associated Press. 10 February 1922. Retrieved 1 November 2017.

[15] Aradi, Zsolt (1958). Pius XI: The Pope and the Man. New York: Hanover House. Retrieved 13 November 2017.^{[page needed]} Republished by Muriwai Books, 2017. Aradi counts one Italian too many and misses the Portuguese cardinal. He counts the Austrian serving as nuncio to Bavaria as Germany rather than Austrian.

[16] Burkle-Young, Francis A. (2000). Papal Elections in the Age of Transition, 1878-1922. Lexington Books.^{[page needed]}

[18] "Pontiff Says Conclave Must Wait for U.S." (PDF). New York Times. 1 March 1922. Retrieved 1 November 2017.

[19] Pope Pius XI (1 March 1922). "Cum proxime" (Document) (in Italian). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. {{cite document}}: Unknown parameter |accessdate= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |url= ignored (help)

[20] "Conclave to Elect Pope is Postponed to March 1" (PDF). New York Times. 11 February 1939. Retrieved 14 November 2017.

[21] "Vatican Door Shut on 62 Cardinals as Conclave Opens to Elect Pope" (PDF). New York Times. 2 March 1939. Retrieved 14 November 2017.

[22] "As the Catholic Church Prepares to Choose a New Leader" (PDF). New York Times. 12 October 1958. Retrieved 6 November 2017.

[23] Pham, John-Peter (2004). Heirs of the Fisherman: Behind the Scenes of Papal Death and Succession. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199334827.^{[page needed]}

[1]

[a]

[3]

[b]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[c]

[10]

[11]

[d]

[14]

[9]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[2]

[12]

[13]

v t e Papal elections and conclaves
Papal selection before 1059 Papal conclave (1274–1276, 1294–present)
Elections and conclaves	1061 1073 1086 1088 1099 1118 1119 1124 1130 1143 1144 1145 1153 1154 1159 1181 1185 October 1187 December 1187 1191 1198 1216 1227 1241 1243 1254 1261 1264–1265 1268–1271 January 1276 July 1276 September 1276 1277 1280–1281 1285 1287–1288 1292–1294 1294 1303 1304–1305 1314–1316 1334 1342 1352 1362 1370 1378 1389 1404 1406 1417 1431 1447 1455 1458 1464 1471 1484 1492 September 1503 electors October 1503 electors 1513 1521–1522 1523 1534 1549–1550 April 1555 May 1555 1559 1565–1566 1572 1585 September 1590 October–December 1590 1591 1592 March–April 1605 electors May 1605 electors 1621 1623 1644 1655 1667 1669–1670 1676 1689 1691 1700 1721 1724 1730 1740 1758 1769 1774–1775 1799–1800 1823 1829 1830–1831 1846 1878 1903 1914 electors 1922 electors 1939 electors 1958 electors 1963 electors August 1978 electors October 1978 electors 2005 electors 2013 electors
Governing documents (selected)	Ubi periculum (1274) Aeterni Patris Filius (1621) Cum proxime (1922) Ingravescentem aetatem (1970) Romano Pontifici eligendo (1975) Universi Dominici gregis (1996) De aliquis mutationibus in normis de electione Romani Pontificis (2007) Normas nonnullas (2013)
Category

Background

Cum proxime

Later experience

See also

Notes

References

External links