Jump to content

Robert S. Duncanson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 99.25.153.151 (talk) at 18:28, 18 May 2020 (Early life: I'm not an expert on this guy, but I am a copy-editor, and I notice that the man first identified as John was within a few sentences instead identified as James. I assume this was simply an error of inattention on the part of the writer.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Robert Seldon Duncanson
Robert S. Duncanson
Born1821 (1821)
Fayette, New York, U.S.
DiedDecember 21, 1872 (1872-12-22)
Detroit, Michigan, U.S.
EducationSelf taught
Known forLandscape painting
MovementThe Hudson River School, The Ohio River Valley style

Robert Seldon Duncanson (1821 – December 21, 1872) was a nineteenth century American artist of European and African ancestry known for his contributions to landscape painting. Inspired by famous American landscape artists like Thomas Cole, Duncanson created renowned landscape paintings and is considered a second generation Hudson River School artist.[1][2] Duncanson spent the majority of his career in Cincinnati, Ohio and helped develop the Ohio River Valley landscape tradition.[2] As a free black man in antebellum America, Duncanson utilized the white abolitionist community in America and England to support and promote his work.[3] Duncanson is considered the first African-American artist to be internationally known.[3] He operated in the elite cultural circles of Cincinnati, Detroit, Montreal, and London. The primary art historical debate centered on Duncanson concerns the role that contemporary racial issues played in his work. Some art historians, like Joseph D. Ketner, believe that Duncanson used racial metaphors in his artwork, while others, like Margaret Rose Vendryes, discourage viewers from approaching his art with a racialized perspective.

Early life

Robert Seldon Duncanson was born in Seneca County, New York, in 1821.[4] Duncanson was one of the five sons of John Dean Duncanson (c. 1777 – 1851), a free black tradesman, and Lucy Nickles (c. 1782 – 1854).[2] Often, it is cited that Robert's father was Scot-Canadian, however, there is no evidence to support this claim, and it is unclear when or where the original source of the claim began. All evidence points to Robert Seldon being the descendant of freed slaves from Virginia.[5] John Dean's father, Charles Duncanson, was a former slave from Virginia who was freed from bondage by his owner. Charles received special privileges, including his emancipation and the opportunity to learn a skilled trade, because he was likely the illegitimate son of his owner.[2] After becoming emancipated, Charles and his son John Dean lived as freemen in Virginia. However, at the end of the eighteenth century, white opposition toward free black men grew in the Upper South. In response, Charles, his son John Dean, and his wife Lucy Nickles, like many free African Americans, moved north. The Duncanson family settled in Fayette, New York, where Robert Seldon was born. Charles' knowledge of carpentry and house painting was passed down to his son, John Dean, and his grandchildren. This knowledge would later allow Robert Seldon Duncanson to develop as an artisan and later as an artist.

In 1828, the family moved to the “boomtown” of Monroe, Michigan following the death of Charles.[6] In Monroe, John Dean found considerable success working as a housepainter and a carpenter.[2] This s[2] uccess allowed him to support his family and educate his children. During their childhood, Robert and his four brothers apprenticed in the family trades of house painting and carpentry. While Robert's brothers achieved modest success as housepainters, Robert emerged as the most talented of his siblings in his apprenticeships. In 1838, Robert established a painting business with partner John Gamblin. Robert and his partner frequently advertised their services in local publications, like the Monroe Gazette.[2] However, in 1839, Robert suspended the business in order to pursue his ambition to work as a portrait painter.

In 1840, nineteen-year-old Duncanson left Monroe and moved to Mt. Healthy, a town north of Cincinnati, to begin his career in fine arts.[7] Duncanson lived in Mt. Healthy with the Reuben Graham family who were also descendants of Virginian slaves. The community of Mt. Healthy, like Cincinnati, had a substantial free black population. In the nineteenth century, Cincinnati was considered a "'southern' town on free soil”.[8] Cincinnati was a fast-growing city—the city’s population grew from 43,000 to 115,000 between 1840 and 1850. In particular, Cincinnati attracted many freed or escape slaves in search of a new community. The city hosted one of the largest African-American communities in the country.[8] Upon Duncanson’s arrival, the African-American population of the city was approximately 3,000. Many of these 3,000 African-Americans living in Cincinnati were previously enslaved. By 1870, the city had 5,900 African-American residents, with an overall population of 216,000.[9]

Duncanson was primarily attracted to Cincinnati for its strong arts community.[7] In the nineteenth century, Cincinnati was referred to as "the Athens of the West".[10] It was also referred to as the "emporium of the West" by its free black population who had much greater access to opportunities of advancement there than in other parts of antebellum America.[7] During the nineteenth century, Cincinnati and the American west became well known for its landscape artists, including William Louis Sonntag, Godfrey Frankenstein, T. Worthington Whittredge, and Duncanson himself.[2]

Career

Itinerant portrait painting

Robert Seldon Duncanson had no formal art education, and thus had to teach himself by copying prints, copying engravings of European works, sketching from nature, and painting portraits.[2] In the 1840s, Duncanson worked primarily as an itinerant portrait painter, like many African-American artists at the time, traveling between Cincinnati, Detroit, and Monroe.[3] His first datable work is from 1841—The Portrait of a Mother and Daughter. This work is similar to the style of many contemporary painters, demonstrating Duncanson's experience learning by copying others' works.[2] In 1842, Duncanson had three portraitsFancy Portrait, Infant Savior, a copy, and Miser—accepted to the second exhibition hosted by the Cincinnati Academy of Fine Arts.[2](p. 15) While Duncanson's work was accepted into the show, and was well received, it is likely that Duncanson was not allowed to take art classes at the Academy because of his race. This exhibition served as his public debut to the art world, but none of Duncanson’s family members were permitted to attend the show because of their race. His mother, while unable to attend the show, is reported to have said “I know what they look like [...] I know that they are there! That’s the important thing.”[11]

Taking a short break from portrait work, Duncanson collaborated with another artist, photographer Coates. Together, on March 19, 1844, Coates and Duncanson advertised a spectacle of "Chemical Paintings...comprising four splendid views after the singular style of Daguerre.”[2](p. 18) Duncanson was believed to have been the artistic mind behind the composition of the images while Coates took care of the technical side. Although Duncanson was making progress as an artist personally and publicly, the lack of commissions for his work pushed him to move around and work as an itinerant portrait painter beginning in 1845, spending the majority of his time in Detroit.

While in Detroit, Duncanson worked primarily as a portrait painter and was well received by the local press. In 1846, the Detroit Daily Advertiser praised Duncanson for his skill and color usage, adding, “Mr. Duncanson deserves, and we trust will receive the patronage of all lovers of the fine arts.”[12] Portrait commissions in Detroit were forthcoming. Duncanson received his most substantial portrait commission by the Berthelet family, a prominent Detroit family.[2] However, Duncanson became more interested in the genre painting tradition. He was first exposed to the tradition of genre painting through the work of fellow Cincinnati artist James H. Beard.[2](p. 19) Duncanson returned to Cincinnati in 1846, aspiring to expand his repertoire.

Landscape painting

Landscape painting was a particularly important genre from the 1830s to the 1900s.[3] Artists like Thomas Cole and other members of the Hudson River School used nature to convey ideas about America and its ideals. Duncanson was intrigued by landscape painting. As he moved away from portrait work, Duncanson became intrigued by travel prints, particularly the exploration journals of John Stevens and Frederick Catherwood, Incidents of Travel in the Yucatan.[2] The prints in these books prompted Duncanson to experiment with depicting exotic places and forgotten civilizations in his work. Back in Cincinnati and full of new inspiration, he received a career-boosting commission from Charles Avery, an abolitionist Methodist minister, in 1848.[6] Not only did Cliff Mine, Lake Superior—the work Duncanson created for Avery—bolster his career as a landscape painter, it also established him within a network of abolitionist patrons who would sustain most of his career.[13]

After completing Cliff Mine, Lake Superior (1848) for Charles Avery, Duncanson pursued landscape painting in earnest. Along with two other Cincinnati artists, T. Worthington Whittredge and William Louis Sonntag, Duncanson became inspired by the work of the Hudson River School artists and aspired to paint the American landscape. Together, the three artists set out on a series of sketching trips around the country to provide them with the necessary material and inspiration to bring back to their Cincinnati studios.[2](p. 28) After finishing the sketching tours, Duncanson focused on the Ohio River Valley in the early 1850s. With his ambitions cast on landscape work, operating on the style of the Hudson River School, Duncanson strived to transform his topographical works into romantic landscapes with literary allusions[14] In order to accomplish this, he turned to Thomas Cole, copying many of his works dealing with paradise and drawing parallels between the imaginary lands painted and America.[2] In 1851, Duncanson's created one most well-known landscape paintings from this time period, Blue Hole, Flood Waters, Miami River. In 1853, Duncanson embarked on the traditional "grand tour" of Europe, completed by many contemporary artists, which exposed him to the art world and provided inspiration for many of his future landscape works.[2] In 1861, Duncanson created his "greatest work"—Land of the Lotus Eaters.[2] This painting was Duncanson's most widely acclaimed work.[15] Moreover, Duncanson intended for the work to receive this tremendous acclaim. He planned to exhibit the work on a European tour before he even began painting it.[2]

Land of the Lotus Eaters, 1861

Abolitionist patronage

Duncanson's success as an artist is partially attributed to the many abolitionist patrons who supported him.[16] Abolitionist patrons provided him with ample commissions, acquired his paintings, financed his travel to various locations nationally and abroad, and introduced him to other prominent people in the art community. Abolitionists were motivated to support artists like Duncanson because it emphasized the abilities of African Americans to participate in and contribute to mainstream culture.[17] Additionally, abolitionists would often commission works with overtly racial themes in order to further the antislavery cause.[3] Duncanson likely received even more support from abolitionist patrons because he was considered mulatto.[3] Duncanson’s lighter complexion, due to the miscegenation that occurred when his ancestors were enslaved, allowed him greater access into the art world than African Americans with darker complexions.[16] There were a number of other African-American artists who shared these advantages due to their light skin, including African-American painter Joshua Johnston. The North, particularly cities like Cincinnati with substantial black populations and strong abolitionist presences, was a more advantageous place for African-Americans to pursue fine arts professions.[16]

Uncle Tom and Little Eva, 1853

Robert Duncanson’s Uncle Tom and Little Eva, painted in 1853, is housed at the Detroit Institute of Arts.[2] This work demonstrates Duncanson's growth in his early years of landscape painting.[15] The painting depicts a scene from Harriet Beecher Stowe's anti-slavery novel Uncle Tom’s Cabin. The painting is a copy of an engraving from the novel's illustrations.[3] While Stowe's novel has many violent scenes that address the brutality of slavery, Duncanson chose to paint an innocuous scene from the book. He depicts two characters, a slave named Tom and the young daughter of a slave owner named Eva, set in an idyllic landscape. Tom and Eva are looking up at the sky—to the heavens and God—at the shore of Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana.[3] The scene is a critical moment in Beecher's novel related to the theme of salvation from slavery through spiritual love and sacrifice. In the 1850s, Duncanson gained popularity amongst abolitionist patrons. Reverend James Francis Conover, an outspoken abolitionist minister and news editor, recognized Duncanson's rise to prominence in the abolitionist art community and commissioned the work.[16] Many abolitionists would commission works that explicitly portrayed the contemporary racial issues.[3] While some art historians believe that Duncanson's works contained metaphors pertaining to issues of race, Uncle Tom and Little Eva is his only painting that explicitly addresses the racial issues of antebellum America by portraying an abolitionist story. As a free black artist active prior to the Civil War, Duncanson was in a unique position to make statements about racial issues, but he typically did not address these issues explicitly in his work.[15] Although Duncanson’s son urged him to address contemporary racial concerns in his works, Duncanson wrote to his son, “I have no color on the brain; all I have on the brain is paint.”[18] Some art historians, such as Joseph D. Ketner, believe that Duncanson intended to make an indictment of the institution of slavery by depicting this delicate yet profound scene from Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin.[2] Other art historians, like Margaret Rose Vendryes, assert that Uncle Tom and Little Eva (1853) demonstrates Duncanson's desire to satisfy abolitionist patrons, and not necessarily his own views.[15]

Nicholas Longworth's Belmont Mansion

Duncanson's success in the Cincinnati art community brought him many substantial commissions, such as that of Nicholas Longworth, one of the city's wealthiest citizens. In 1851, Longworth commissioned Duncanson to paint murals on the walls of his home, which was called the Belmont Mansion.[11] Duncanson created eight murals for the entry of the Belmont Mansion, each nine feet high and six and a half feet wide, that depicted landscapes of the American West. Although the scale of the job was large, and Duncanson was still relatively new to the profession, Longworth selected him to decorate his home because he thought Duncanson to be “one of our most promising painters.”[13] Duncanson's previous training in the trade of house painting served him well in his work on the Belmont Mansion. Duncanson's work on the murals in the Belmont Mansion greatly increased his popularity in the art community of Cincinnati, particularly among the white abolitionist contingent.[3] The murals were eventually covered by wallpaper, but were rediscovered in 1933 and are now displayed in the Taft Museum of Art in Cincinnati.[3]

Work with daguerrotypist James Presley Ball

Beginning in 1854, Duncanson worked in the photography studio of James Presley Ball, a prominent African-American photographer, retouching portraits and coloring photographic prints.[2](pp. 101–103) In 1855, Duncanson and Presley Ball created an anti-slavery panoramic painting titled Mammoth Pictorial Tour of the United States Comprising Views of the African Slave Trade which toured across the country. The work displayed images of the African slave trade, sugar and cotton plantations, and American landscape scenes.

Self-imposed exile and international acclaim

With the onset of the Civil War, Duncanson exiled himself to Canada and the United Kingdom. In 1863, Duncanson settled in Montreal where he would work for two years. Duncanson was inspired by the Canadian landscape, as is evident from his works produced then. While in Montreal, Duncanson developed important relationships within the Canadian art scene. He was accepted enthusiastically by the Montreal art community, and served as an inspiration for Canadian painters such as Otto Reinhold Jacobi.[19] The Canadians thought of Duncanson as one of “the earliest of our professional cultivators of the fine arts.”[13] Duncanson had a tremendous influence on nineteenth century Canadian art; he inspired the creation of the first Canadian school of landscape painting.[19] In 1865, he left Canada for the United Kingdom, particularly England and Scotland, to tour one of his most well-known works, The Land of the Lotus Eaters (1861). In Europe, his work was well received and the prestigious London Art Journal declared him a master of landscape painting.[13] In the winter of 1866–1867, Duncanson returned to Cincinnati. Inspired by his European travels, he painted many scenes of the Scottish landscape. Duncanson's time in Canada and the United Kingdom allowed him to gain even greater recognition in the international art scene.[19]

Ellen's Isle, Loch Katrine, 1871

Ellen's Isle, Loch Katrine, 1871

This painting was inspired by a selection from Scottish writer Sir Walter Scott's 1810 poem, The Lady of the Lake.[6] The narrative poem was important to several important contemporary African American leaders, such as W.E.B. Du Bois and Frederick Douglass.[2] Art historian Joseph D. Ketner considers Ellen's Isle, Loch Katrine to be the "pinnacle of [Duncanson's] aesthetic and technical accomplishments."[6] The work shows Duncanson's use of the conventions of Hudson River School artists, as well as his own romantic vision for landscape painting.[17]

Final years

Throughout his career, Duncanson's works had always tended toward the pastoral, and his late works continued to show his love of landscape painting and resonated calmness and serenity.[2](p. 157) In the final years of his life, Duncanson developed dementia, possibly from lead poisoning. The dementia, and possibly schizophrenia, caused Duncanson to act unpredictably and erratically. He developed a belief in spiritualism and was convinced that he was possessed by a master painter.[2] While Duncanson continued to create artwork, his behavior and declining physical health was alarming to his patrons. In 1872, Duncanson suffered a seizure while setting up an exhibition in Detroit, which eventually led to his death.[2] Duncanson died on December 21, 1872—he was 51 years old.[11] He was buried at the Woodland Cemetery in Monroe, Michigan.

Legacy

Robert Seldon Duncanson was one of few African American landscape painters of the nineteenth century, and he achieved levels of success unknown to his contemporaries.[17] Richard Powell of American Visions says that Duncanson’s success is a “victory over society’s presumptions of what African-American artist should create.”[20] Duncanson became nationally and internationally known for his landscape paintings modeled after the Hudson River School tradition, and is credited with developing the regional Ohio River Valley art form.[17] Art historian Joseph D. Ketner claims that Duncanson's greatest contribution to art was "his distinctively picturesque-pastoral vision of landscape painting with allusions to popular romantic literature."[2]

Duncanson was largely forgotten from American art history until his work was rediscovered in the 1950s and 1960s.[2] However, art historians maintained a false narrative about Duncanson for several decades. Beginning in the 1990s, art historians like Ketner made an effort to research Duncanson's life and work to develop an accurate portrayal of the artist.

The primary art historical controversy surrounding Duncanson is whether or not he represented racial issues in his art. Some art historians, like Ketner, theorize that there are veiled racial meanings in his paintings, while others, like Vendryes, consider his landscapes to be “race-free."[15] Ketner asserts that Duncanson's artworks are representations of his cultural and racial identity. Vendryes argues that Duncanson did not explicitly represent contemporary racial issues in his work, and warns viewers from interpreting Duncanson and his art solely through the lens of his race, as it may limit the viewer's understanding of his work.

Since 1986, the Taft Museum of Art in Cincinnati, Ohio has maintained an artist-in-residence program for contemporary African-American artists in honor of Duncanson.[21]

Abbreviated list of artworks

Exhibitions

See also

Notes

  1. ^ "Duncanson, Robert Seldon". Getty Union List of Artist Names. The J. Paul Getty Trust. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac Ketner, Joseph D. The Emergence of the African-American Artist: Robert S. Duncanson, 1821–1872. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1993. ISBN 0-8262-0880-0
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Patton, Sharon (1998). African-American Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. ^ "Pre-Civil War: Robert Scott Duncanson". Public Broadcasting Service. Archived from the original on March 19, 2015.
  5. ^ Kahn, Eve M. (July 15, 2011). "Condemning Slavery With a Paintbrush". New York Times. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  6. ^ a b c d Ketner, Joseph D. (2008). "Duncanson, Robert S." Africana: The Encyclopedia of the African and African-American Experience, Second Edition – via Oxford African American Studies Center.
  7. ^ a b c Katz, Wendy Jean (2002). Regionalism and Reform: Art and Class Formation in Antebellum Cincinnati. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press. p. 90. ISBN 0-8142-0906-8.
  8. ^ a b Bearden, Romare; Henderson, Harry (1993). A History of African-American Artists: From 1792 to the Present. New York: Pantheon Books. pp. 19–20.
  9. ^ Mendelsohn, Jim (2008). Appiah, Kwame Anthony (ed.). "Cincinnati, Ohio". Africana: The Encyclopedia of the African and African American Experience, Second Edition – via Oxford African American Studies Center.
  10. ^ Lifting the Veil: The Emergence of the African American Artist. St. Louis: Sayers Printing, 1995.
  11. ^ a b c Bearden, 1972.
  12. ^ "Lifting the Veil" 1995.
  13. ^ a b c d Lifting the Veil, 1995
  14. ^ Public Broadcasting System.
  15. ^ a b c d e Vendryes, Margaret Rose (2001). "Race Identity/Identifying Race: Robert S. Duncanson and Nineteenth-Century American Painting". Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies. 27 (1): 82–104.
  16. ^ a b c d Farrington, Lisa E. (2012). "Black or White?: Racial Identity in Nineteenth-Century African-American Art". Source: Notes in the History of Art. 31 (3): 5–12. JSTOR 23208589.
  17. ^ a b c d Mercer, Valerie J.; Buick, Kirsten Pai (2012). "African American Artists Gain Access to the Fine Art Professions". Bulletin of the Detroit Institute of Arts. 86 (1/4): 8–17. JSTOR 43492323.
  18. ^ Powell, Richard J. "Seeing and Thinking About the unexpected in American Art." American Visions 14, no. 1 (1999).
  19. ^ a b c Pringle, Allan. "Robert S. Duncanson in Montreal, 1863–1865." American Art Journal 17, no. 4 (1985).
  20. ^ Powell, 1999.
  21. ^ "Past Duncanson Artist-in-Residence". Taft Museum of Art. Retrieved 2018-06-12.