Catawba Nuclear Station
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (March 2011) |
| Catawba Nuclear Station | |
|---|---|
 | |
 Location in South Carolina##Location in the United States | |
| Country | United States |
| Location | York, York County, South Carolina |
| Coordinates | 35°3.1′N 81°4.2′W / 35.0517°N 81.0700°W |
| Status | Operational |
| Construction began | May 1, 1974 |
| Commission date | Unit 1: June 29, 1985 Unit 2: August 19, 1986 |
| Construction cost | $6.594 billion USD (2007)[1] |
| Operator(s) | Duke Energy |
| Nuclear power station | |
| Reactor type | PWR |
| Reactor supplier | Westinghouse |
| Thermal capacity | 2 × 3411 MWth |
| Power generation | |
| Units operational | 1 × 1146 MW 1 × 1150 MW |
| Make and model | WH 4-loop (ICECND) |
| Nameplate capacity | 2296 MW |
| Capacity factor | 97.98% (2017) 86.35% (lifetime) |
| Annual net output | 19,707 GWh (2017) |
| External links | |
| Website | www |
| Commons | Related media on Commons |
The Catawba Nuclear Station is a nuclear power plant located on a 391-acre (158 ha) peninsula, called "Concord Peninsula", that reaches out into Lake Wylie, in York, South Carolina. Catawba utilizes a pair of Westinghouse four-loop pressurized water reactors.[2]
As a part of the Megatons to Megawatts Program Catawba was one of the plants that received and tested 4 fuel assemblies containing MOX fuel with the plutonium supplied from old weapons programs.[3] Because concerns of nuclear proliferation are greater with fuel containing plutonium, special precautions and added security were used around the new fuel. The 4 test assemblies did not perform as expected and at present those plans are shelved.[4]
Ownership
- Unit 1:
- Operator : Duke Power
- Owners: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 19.25% ; North Carolina Municipal Power Agency 37.50% ; North Carolina Electric Member Corporation 30.75% [5]
- Unit 2:
- Operator: Duke Power
- Owners: as above, 12.5 % Piedmont Municipal Power Agency (PMPA)[6]
Surrounding population
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of 10 miles (16 km), concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about 50 miles (80 km), concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity.[7]
The 2010 U.S. population within 10 miles (16 km) of Catawba was 213,407, an increase of 53.3 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of 2010 United States Census. The 2010 U.S. population within 50 miles (80 km) was 2,559,394, an increase of 25.0 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Charlotte NC (35 miles to city center).[8]
Seismic risk
In 2010, the NRC estimated the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Catawba was 1 in 27,027.[9][10]
Incidents
May 15, 2013
More than 100 gallons of water contaminated with radioactive tritium was released. However, the levels of tritium were less than one half the EPA limit for tritium, and the leak was contained before it reached ground water.[11]
See also
References
- ^ "EIA - State Nuclear Profiles". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 3 October 2017.
- ^ "Catawba Nuclear Station". South Carolina Nuclear Profile. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Retrieved 8 April 2011.
- ^ "Military Warheads as a Source of Nuclear Fuel". World Nuclear Association. Retrieved 8 April 2011.
- ^ Pavey, Rob (17 November 2009). "Duke Energy won't do more MOX tests". The Augusta Chronicle. Retrieved 11 April 2011.
- ^ www.eia.gov (retrieved 1 April 2017)
- ^ www.eia.gov (retrieved 1 April 2017). According to http://www.pmpa.com/index.aspx?page=51 (retrieved 1 April 2017), PMPA held 25 % of Unit 2.
- ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2006-10-02. Retrieved 2012-08-17.
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|deadurl=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ Bill Dedman, Nuclear neighbors: Population rises near US reactors, msnbc.com, April 14, 2011 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42555888/ns/us_news-life/ Accessed May 1, 2011.
- ^ Bill Dedman, What are the odds? US nuke plants ranked by quake risk," msnbc.com, March 17, 2011.
- ^ Memorandum about seismic hazard estimates (pdf, September 2, 2010)
- ^ Dyches, Chris (2013). "Emergency Manager: No reason for concern after radioactive leak at nuclear station". wbtv.com. Retrieved 8 January 2018.
{{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|dead-url=(help)
External links
- "Catawba 1 Pressurized Water Reactor". Operating Nuclear Power Reactors. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). February 14, 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-15.
- "Catawba 2 Pressurized Water Reactor". Operating Nuclear Power Reactors. NRC. February 14, 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-15.