Category:Stub-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
Appearance
![]() | Administrators: Please do not delete this category as empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | B | C | Start | Stub | ![]() | List | Category | NA | ??? |
31 | 1 | 131 | 734 | 2,569 | 6,203 | 4,194 | 1 | 242 | 3,639 | 1,066 | 64 |
- Parent WikiProject: Wikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America,
This page categorizes pages using assessment grades, through built-in transclusion from {{NorthAmNative}}.
Information on Grading Scheme
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
![]() |
The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
![]() |
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
![]() |
The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
Note: We have non standard grades (as well as those listed above) for merge, delete, AfD etc., see Codes and meanings.
For a list of articles so classified, see: quality log and quality statistics.
Pages in category "Stub-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 4,194 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.
(previous page) (next page)N
O
- Talk:O-Chi-Chak-Ko-Sipi First Nation
- Talk:O-Pipon-Na-Piwin Cree Nation
- Talk:O-saw-wah-pon
- Talk:O'Chiese 203
- Talk:O'Chiese Cemetery 203A
- Talk:O'Chiese First Nation
- Talk:Luis Oacpicagigua
- Talk:Brandon Oakes
- Talk:Obabika Old-Growth Forest
- Talk:Obabikong 35B
- Talk:Obadjiwan 15E
- Talk:Obashkaandagaang Bay First Nation
- Talk:Obbatinewat
- Talk:Obion Mounds
- Talk:Annick Obonsawin
- Talk:Jean O'Brien
- Talk:Ocean Man 69
- Talk:Ocean Man 69A
- Talk:Ocean Man 69B
- Talk:Ocean Man 69C
- Talk:Ocean Man 69D
- Talk:Ocean Man 69E
- Talk:Ocean Man 69F
- Talk:Ocean Man 69G
- Talk:Ocean Man 69H
- Talk:Ocean Man 69I
- Talk:Ocean Man 69N
- Talk:Ocean Man 69S
- Talk:Ocean Man 69U
- Talk:Ocean Man 69X
- Talk:Ocean Man First Nation
- Talk:John Oceguera
- Talk:Ochapowace 71
- Talk:Ochapowace 71-7
- Talk:Ochapowace 71-10
- Talk:Ochapowace 71-18
- Talk:Ochapowace 71-26
- Talk:Ochapowace 71-44
- Talk:Ochapowace 71-51
- Talk:Ochapowace 71-54
- Talk:Ochapowace 71-70
- Talk:Ochapowace Nation
- Talk:Molly Ockett
- Talk:Ocoee, Tennessee
- Talk:Oconaluftee Indian Village
- Talk:Oconee War
- Talk:Ocuiltec language
- Talk:Off-reservation trust land
- Talk:Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
- Talk:Ogemawahj Tribal Council
- Talk:Oglala Lakota College
- Talk:Ohio Valley Siouan languages
- Talk:Ohunka
- Talk:Oji-Cree
- Talk:Ojibway Nation of Saugeen
- Talk:Ojibways of Onigaming First Nation
- Talk:Ojo Encino, New Mexico
- Talk:Okanagan Mission
- Talk:Okanagan Nation Alliance
- Talk:Okanese 82
- Talk:Okchai
- Talk:Okelousa
- Talk:John Okemos
- Talk:Okeus
- Talk:Okfuskee
- Talk:Maudie Rachel Okittuq
- Talk:Françoise Oklaga
- Talk:Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act
- Talk:Old Camp Casino
- Talk:Old Copper complex
- Talk:Old Cordilleran culture
- Talk:Old Fort 157B
- Talk:Old Fort 217
- Talk:Old Fort Ruin
- Talk:Old Indian Legends
- Talk:Old-Lady-Grieves-the-Enemy
- Talk:Old Massett Village Council
- Talk:Old Montagnais
- Talk:Old Tassel
- Talk:Old Tobacco
- Talk:Old Town (Mississippi)
- Talk:Olelbis
- Talk:Marcus Oliveira
- Talk:Oljato Trading Post
- Talk:Oljato–Monument Valley, Utah
- Talk:Olotoraca
- Talk:Donny Olson
- Talk:Sara Olsvig
- Talk:Bernard Ominayak
- Talk:On the War Trail
- Talk:One Arrow 95
- Talk:One Arrow 95-1A
- Talk:One Arrow 95-1C
- Talk:One Arrow 95-1D
- Talk:One Bull
- Talk:One Man Lake 29
- Talk:One Who Walks with the Stars
- Talk:Oneida First Nation
- Talk:Oneota
- Talk:Onikahp Sahghikansis 165E
- Talk:Onion Lake 119-1
- Talk:Onion Lake 119-2
- Talk:Onion Lake Cree Nation
- Talk:Onojutta-Haga
- Talk:Onondaga Clear Sky First Nation
- Talk:Onontio
- Talk:Ontonagon Indian Reservation
- Talk:Onyotaa:ka First Nation
- Talk:Isa Oomayoualook
- Talk:Oowekyala
- Talk:Opatrny Village Site
- Talk:Opelousa
- Talk:Orange period
- Talk:Oregon History (mural)
- Talk:Oregon Jack Creek Band
- Talk:Orendorf Site
- Talk:Joseph Orono
- Talk:Orpingalik
- Talk:Osage Nation Museum
- Talk:Osage Treaty (1825)
- Talk:Mike Osburn
- Talk:Marcellus Osceola Jr.
- Talk:Joe Dan Osceola
- Talk:Mary Gay Osceola
- Talk:Osnaburgh 63A
- Talk:Osnaburgh 63B
- Talk:Alvin Osterback
- Talk:Oswegatchie people
- Talk:John Other Day
- Talk:Otomi language (Jalisco)
- Talk:Otomitl
- Talk:Eva Ottawa
- Talk:Oujé-Bougoumou Cree Nation
- Talk:Ounalashka Corporation
- Talk:Our Fires Still Burn
- Talk:Our Spirits Don't Speak English
- Talk:Oureouharé
- Talk:Bo Overton
- Talk:Oweekeno
- Talk:Owl Creek Mounds
- Talk:Oxford House, Manitoba
P
- Talk:Pacheedaht First Nation
- Talk:Pacific Coast Athabaskan languages
- Talk:Josie Padluq
- Talk:Susanne Page
- Talk:Jeff Pahukoa
- Talk:Painal
- Talk:Paint Creek site
- Talk:Paint Rock Canyon Archeological Landscape District
- Talk:Palace Bingo and Casino
- Talk:Palewyami Yokuts
- Talk:Pallirmiut
- Talk:Pamisseu
- Talk:Pamola
- Talk:Pana (mythology)
- Talk:John Pangnark
- Talk:Panti'
- Talk:Paomet
- Talk:Josie Pamiutu Papialuk
- Talk:Joe Pappio
- Talk:Paqtnkek-Niktuek No. 23
- Talk:Aaron Paquette
- Talk:Paradise Casino
- Talk:Paradise Spring Treaty Grounds
- Talk:Gerard Parker
- Talk:LaRue Parker
- Talk:Pasqua 79
- Talk:Pasqua First Nation
- Talk:Passaconaway
- Talk:Amisoli Patasoni
- Talk:Sheouak Petaulassie
- Talk:J. R. Patton
- Talk:Patuxent people
- Talk:Dora Patzkowski
- Talk:Johnson Paudash
- Talk:Chief Paugus
- Talk:Moses Paukan
- Talk:Maggie Paul
- Talk:Paulina (Paiute leader)
- Talk:Pauloff Harbor Village
- Talk:Pauma Complex
- Talk:Pauquachin
- Talk:Pauquachin First Nation
- Talk:Pawala Indian Reserve No. 5
- Talk:Pawnee Killer
- Talk:Pawnee Reservation
- Talk:Andy Payne
- Talk:King Payne
- Talk:Pays Plat First Nation
- Talk:Peace Point 222