This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Toronto, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Toronto on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TorontoWikipedia:WikiProject TorontoTemplate:WikiProject TorontoToronto articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles
This page is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
I noticed that the creator of this page is being overly literal with the advice to "look for 2-3 sources" and that an article needs "usually at least 3 reliable sources". I want to make sure you saw my response on my talk page. I also want to say that it is not Wikipedia's rule that if there are exactly three newspaper articles of any kind, a subject is definitely entitled to a Wikipedia article. There is intentionally no rule for how many sources count as "multiple sources" in the WP:GNG because it's a qualitative, contextual judgment call.
Finding some sources is meant to equip editors with information about why the subject is notable. Specifically, which criteria does this person meet? There is definitely not enough evidence here to show that they meet WP:CREATIVE for their writing or their music. Activists don't have a specific notability guideline, but in my experience they typically gain articles after being associated with at least one (and ideally more than one) movement/organization/award with national coverage. For some unambiguously notable activists, see Greta Thunberg or Ari Ne'eman.
Another way to think about sources is that they are necessary for the article to have meaningful content. I edited the draft to put all the currently-supported information into "wikivoice". I think we can agree that what remains is not a very interesting or notable article. That's why the three sources are still coming across as insufficient: the information inside them does not seem to add up to much of an article. You may find WP:BACKWARD a useful essay. At this point, I think it's unlikely that the necessary sources exist. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 00:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
