Jump to content

Falcon 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Davoloid (talk | contribs) at 16:54, 14 November 2016 (→Launches previously planned, but never flown on Falcon 1). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Falcon 1
Falcon 1 rocket.
FunctionOrbital launch vehicle
ManufacturerSpaceX
Country of originUnited States
Project costUS$90 million
Size
Height21.3 m (70 ft)
Diameter1.7 m (5.5 ft)
Mass38,555 kg (85,000 lb)
Stages2
Capacity
Payload to LEO180 kg (400 lb) demonstrated; 670 kg (1480 lb) proposed [1]
Payload to
SSO		430 kg (990 lb)
Launch history
StatusRetired[2]
Launch sitesOmelek Island
Total launches5
Success(es)2
Failure(s)3
Partial failure(s)0
First flightMarch 24, 2006
22:30 GMT
Last flightJuly 14, 2009
03:35 GMT
First stage
Engines1 Merlin 1A (first 2 flights), 1 Merlin 1C (final 3 flights)
Thrust454 kN (102,000 lbf)
Specific impulse255 s (sea level)
(2.6 kN·s/kg)
Burn time169 seconds
PropellantRP-1/LOX
Second stage
Engines1 Kestrel
Thrust31 kN (7,000 lbf)
Specific impulse327 s (vacuum)
(3.2 kN·s/kg)
Burn time378 seconds
PropellantRP-1/LOX
[edit on Wikidata]

The Falcon 1 was an expendable launch system privately developed and manufactured by SpaceX during 2006–2009.[3] On 28 September 2008, Falcon 1 became the first privately-developed liquid-fuel launch vehicle to go into orbit around the Earth.[4]: 203 

The two-stage-to-orbit rocket used LOX/RP-1 for both stages, the first powered by a single Merlin engine and the second powered by a single Kestrel engine. It was designed by SpaceX from the ground up.

The vehicle was launched a total of five times. Falcon 1 achieved orbit on its fourth attempt, in September 2008 with a mass simulator as a payload. On 14 July 2009, Falcon 1 made its final flight and successfully delivered the Malaysian RazakSAT satellite to orbit on SpaceX's first commercial launch (fifth launch overall). Following its fifth launch, the Falcon 1 was retired and succeeded by Falcon 9.

SpaceX had announced an enhanced variant, the Falcon 1e,[2] but development was stopped in favor of Falcon 9.

History

Private funding

The Falcon 1 rocket was developed with private funding.[5][6] The only other orbital launch vehicles to be privately funded and developed were the Conestoga in 1982 and Pegasus, first launched in 1990; which uses a large aircraft as its first stage.[7]

The total development cost of Falcon 1 was approximately US$90 million.[8]

While the development of Falcon 1 was privately funded, the first two Falcon 1 launches were purchased by the United States Department of Defense under a program that evaluates new US launch vehicles suitable for use by DARPA.[6][9][10]

Launches previously planned, but never flown on Falcon 1

As part of a US$15 million contract, Falcon 1 was to carry the TacSat-1[11] in 2005. By late May 2005, SpaceX stated that Falcon 1 was ready to launch TacSat-1 from Vandenberg. But the Air Force did not want the launch of an untested rocket to occur until the final Titan IV flew from nearby SLC 4E. Subsequent and repeated delays due to Falcon 1 launch failures delayed TacSat-1's launch. After TacSat-2 was launched on an Orbital Sciences Minotaur I on December 16, 2006, the Department of Defense re-evaluated the need for launching TacSat-1. In August 2007, the Department of Defense canceled the planned launch of TacSat-1[12] because all of the TacSat objectives had been met.

An August 2005 update on SpaceX's website [13] showed 6 launches planned for Falcon 1, with customers including MDA Corp (CASSIOPE, which eventually launched in 2013 on Falcon 9), Swedish Space Corp and US Air Force.

Design

First-stage view of the Merlin engine.

According to SpaceX, the Falcon 1 was designed to minimize price per launch for low-Earth-orbit satellites, increase reliability, and optimize flight environment and time to launch.[14] It also was used to verify components and structural design concepts that would be reused in the Falcon 9. SpaceX started with the smallest useful orbital rocket (Falcon 1 with about 1000 lbs to orbit), instead of building something larger and more complicated, and then run of out money and go bankrupt.[15]

First stage

The first stage was made from friction-stir-welded 2219 aluminum alloy.[16] It employs a common bulkhead between the LOX and RP-1 tanks, as well as flight pressure stabilization. It can be transported safely without pressurization (like the heavier Delta II isogrid design) but gains additional strength when pressurized for flight (like the Atlas II, which could not be transported unpressurized). The parachute system, built by Irvin Para­chute Corp­oration, uses a high-speed drogue chute and a main chute.

For the first two launches, the Falcon 1 used a Merlin 1A engine. An improved version of the Merlin 1A, the Merlin 1B, was supposed to fly on later flights of the Falcon 1, although it was further improved to create the Merlin 1C, which was first flown on the third Falcon 1 flight, and on the first 5 flights of the Falcon 9. The Falcon 1 first stage was powered by a single pump-fed Merlin 1C engine burning RP-1 and liquid oxygen providing 410 kilonewtons (92,000 lbf) of sea-level thrust and a specific impulse of 245 s (vacuum Isp 290 s).[16] The first stage burns to depletion, taking around 169 seconds to do so.[16]

Second stage

The second stage Falcon 1 tanks were built with a cryogenic-compatible 2014 aluminum alloy,[16] with the plan to move to aluminum-lithium alloy on the Falcon 1e.[16] The helium pressurization system pumps propellant to the engine, supplies heated[16] pressurized gas for the attitude control thrusters, and is used for zero-g propellant accumulation prior to engine restart. The Kestrel engine includes a titanium heat exchanger to pass waste heat to the helium, thereby greatly extending its work capacity.[17] The pressure tanks are composite overwrapped pressure vessels made by Arde corporation with inconel alloy and are the same as those used in the Delta IV.[18]

The second stage was powered by a pressure-fed Kestrel engine with 31 kilonewtons (7,000 lbf) of vacuum thrust and a vacuum specific impulse of 330 s.[16]

Reusability

It had originally been planned that the first stage will return by parachute to a water landing and be recovered for reuse, but this capability was never demonstrated.[19][20] The second stage was not designed to be reusable.[19][20]

Launch sequence

At launch, the first stage engine (Merlin) is ignited and throttled to full power while the launcher is restrained and all systems are verified by the flight computer. If the systems are operating correctly, the rocket is released and clears the tower in about seven seconds. The first-stage burn lasts about 2 minutes and 49 seconds. Stage separation is accomplished with explosive bolts and a pneumatically actuated pusher system.

The second stage Kestrel engine burns for about six minutes, inserting the payload into a low Earth orbit. It is capable of multiple restarts.

Pricing

SpaceX is one of the few launch system operators that publishes its launch prices, which are quoted as being the same for all customers.[21] In 2005 Falcon 1 was advertised as costing $5.9 million ($7.3 million when adjusted for inflation in 2015).[1][22] In 2006 until 2007 the quoted price of the rocket when operational was $6.7 million.[23] In late 2009 SpaceX announced new prices for the Falcon 1 and 1e at $7 million and $8.5 million respectively, with small discounts available for multi-launch contracts,[14] and in 2012 announced that payloads originally selected as flying on the Falcon 1 and 1e would fly as secondary payloads on the Falcon 9.[2]

Historically, the Falcon 1 was originally planned to launch about 600 kilograms (1,300 lb) to low-Earth orbit for US$6,000,000 but later declined to approximately 420 kilograms (930 lb) as the price increased to approximately US$9,000,000. It was SpaceX's offering intended to open up the smallsat launch market to competition. The final version of the Falcon 1, the Falcon 1e,[24] was projected to provide approximately 1,000 kilograms (2,200 lb) for US$11 million. The vehicle is now retired.

Several years ago, SpaceX was going to open up the smallsat launch market with the Falcon 1, which originally was to launch about 600 kilograms to LEO for $6 million; the payload capacity later declined to about 420 kilograms as the price increased to around $9 million. Later, the Falcon 1e was to provide approximately 1,000 kilograms for $11 million, but the company withdrew the vehicle from the market, citing limited demand.[25]

Launch sites

Falcon 1 first flight attempt with NASA partnership cargo at Omelek Island launchpad

All flights have been launched from Kwajalein Atoll using the SpaceX launch facility on Omelek Island and range facilities of the Reagan Test Site.

Vandenberg AFB Space Launch Complex 3W was the original launch site for Falcon 1, but it was abandoned at the test-fire stage due to persistent schedule conflicts with adjacent launch pads.[26] Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Space Launch Complex 40 (the Falcon 9 pad) was considered for Falcon 1 launches but never developed before Falcon 1 was retired.[27]

Variants

Falcon 1 Versions[14][28][29] Merlin A; 2006–2007 Merlin C; 2007–2009 Falcon 1e (proposed)
Stage 1 1 × Merlin 1A 1 × Merlin 1C 1 × Merlin 1C
Stage 2 1 × Kestrel 1 × Kestrel 1 × Kestrel
Height
(max; m) 		21.3 22.25 26.83
Diameter
(m) 		1.7 1.7 1.7
Initial thrust
(kN) 		318 343 454
Takeoff weight
(tonnes) 		27.2 33.23 38.56
Fairing diameter
(Inner; m) 		1.5 1.5 1.71
Payload
(LEO 185 km; kg) 		570 (less to SSO)[citation needed] 450 (less to SSO)[citation needed] 1,010 (430 to SSO)[citation needed]
Payload
(GTO; kg) 		— — —
Price
(Mil. USD) 		6.7 7 10.9
minimal Price/kg
(LEO 185 km; USD) 		11,754[citation needed] 15,556[citation needed] 10,800 (25,348 to SSO)[citation needed]
minimal Price/kg
(GTO; USD) 		— — —
Success ratio
(successful/total) 		0/2 2/3 —

Launch history

Falcon 1 made five launches. The first three failed, however the subsequent two flights were successful, the first successful launch making it the first privately funded and developed liquid-propellent rocket to reach orbit.[4]: 203  The fifth launch was its first commercial flight, and placed RazakSAT into low Earth orbit.[30]

Flight No Date & Time (GMT) Payload Customer Outcome Remarks
1 24 March 2006, 22:30
(25 March, 09:30 local) 		FalconSAT-2 DARPA Failure Engine failure at T+33 seconds
Loss of vehicle[31]
2 21 March 2007, 01:10
(13:10 local) 		DemoSat DARPA Failure Successful first stage burn and transition to second stage, maximum altitude 289 km
Harmonic oscillation at T+5 minutes
Premature engine shutdown at T+7 min 30 s
Failed to reach orbit
Failed to recover first stage
Claimed to be a "Partial success" as it gathered enough data for operational flights[32]
3 3 August 2008, 03:34[33]
(15:34 local) 		Trailblazer ORS Failure Residual stage 1 thrust led to collision between stage 1 and stage 2[34]
PRESat NASA
NanoSail-D NASA
Explorers Celestis[35]
4 28 September 2008, 23:15[20][36]
(11:15 local/16:15 PDT) 		RatSat SpaceX Success[20] Initially scheduled for 23–25 Sept, carried dummy payload – mass simulator, 165 kg (originally intended to be RazakSAT)
5 14 July 2009[37] 03:35 RazakSAT ATSB Success[38]
Previously manifested launches[35]
2011 TBD SpaceDev Not scheduled was to be maiden flight of 1e configuration
2011–2014 O2G Orbcomm[39] Successful - Falcon 9 18 satellites, launch vehicle switched to Falcon 9,
2013 Formosat-5 NSPO Scheduled Launch vehicle switched from Falcon 1e to Falcon 9
2014 through 2015 Small satellites Astrium Not scheduled Launch vehicle was to be Falcon 1e

First flight

Main article: FalconSAT-2
SatellitefairingKestrel (rocket engine)MECOMerlin (rocket engine)
Launch sequence (maiden flight example);
time scale is in seconds.

The maiden flight of the Falcon 1 was launched on Saturday, 24 March 2006 at 22:30 UTC. It ended in failure less than a minute into the flight because of a fuel line leak and subsequent fire. The launch took place from the SpaceX launch site on Omelek Island in the Marshall Islands.

The launch was postponed several times because of various technical issues with the new vehicle. Scheduling conflicts with a Titan IV launch at Vandenberg AFB also caused delays and resulted in the launch moving to the Reagan Test Site in the Kwajalein Atoll. The first launch attempt on 19 December 2005 was scrubbed when a faulty valve caused a vacuum in the first stage fuel tank which sucked inward and caused structural damage. After replacing the first stage, Falcon 1 launched Saturday, 25 March 2006 at 09:30 local time. The DARPA payload was the United States Air Force Academy’s FalconSAT–2, which would have measured space plasma phenomena.

The vehicle had a noticeable rolling motion after liftoff, as shown on the launch video, rocking back and forth a bit, and then at T+26 seconds rapidly pitched over. Impact occurred at T+41 seconds onto a dead reef about 250 feet from the launch site. The FalconSAT–2 payload separated from the booster and landed on the island, with damage reports varying from slight to significant.[40]

SpaceX initially attributed the fire to an improperly tightened fuel-line nut. A later review by DARPA found that the nut was properly tightened, since its locking wire was still in place, but had failed because of corrosion.

SpaceX implemented numerous changes to the rocket design and software to prevent this type of failure from recurring, including stainless steel to replace aluminum hardware (which is actually less expensive, although the trade off is being a little heavier in weight) and pre-liftoff computer checks that increased by a factor of thirty.[41][42]

Second flight

Main article: Falcon 1 DemoFlight 2

The second test flight was originally scheduled for January 2007, but was delayed because of problems with the second stage. Before the January launch date, SpaceX had stated earlier potential launch dates, moving from September 2006 to November and December. In December the launch was rescheduled for 9 March, but delayed because of range availability issues caused by a Minuteman III test flight which would re-enter over Kwajelein. The launch attempt on 19 March was delayed 45 minutes from 23:00 GMT because of a data relay issue, and then scrubbed one minute and two seconds before launch at 23:45 because of a computer issue, whereby the safety computer incorrectly detected a transmission failure caused by a hardware delay of a few milliseconds in the process. The 20 March attempt was delayed 65 minutes, from an originally planned time of 23:00 because of a problem with communications between one of the NASA experiments in the payload, and the TDRS system.

The launch attempt on March 21, 2007 was aborted at 00:05 GMT at the last second before launch and after the engine had ignited. It was however decided that another launch should be made the same day. The rocket successfully left the launch pad at 01:10 GMT on 21 March 2007 with a DemoSat payload for DARPA and NASA. The rocket performed well during the first stage burn. However, during staging, the interstage fairing on the top of the first stage bumped the second stage engine bell.[43] The bump occurred as the second stage nozzle exited the interstage, with the first stage rotating much faster than expected (a rotation rate of about 2.5 deg/s vs. expected rate of 0.5 deg/s maximum), thereby making contact with the niobium nozzle of the second stage. Elon Musk reported that the bump did not appear to have caused damage, and that the reason why they chose a niobium skirt instead of carbon-carbon was to prevent problematic damage in the event of such incidents. Shortly after second stage ignition, a stabilization ring detached from the engine bell as designed.[44] At around T+4:20, a circular coning oscillation began that increased in amplitude until video was lost. At T+5:01, the vehicle started to roll and telemetry ended. According to Elon Musk, the second stage engine shut down at T+7.5 minutes because of a roll control issue. Sloshing of propellant in the LOX tank increased oscillation. This oscillation would normally have been dampened by the Thrust Vector Control system in the second stage, but the bump to the second nozzle during separation caused an overcompensation in the correction.[44] The rocket continued to within one minute of its desired location, and also managed to deploy the satellite mass simulator ring. While the webcast video ended prematurely, SpaceX was able to retrieve telemetry for the entire flight.[45] The status of the first stage is unknown; it was not recovered because of problems with a nonfunctioning GPS tracking device. The rocket reached a final altitude of 289 km (180 mi) and a final velocity of 5.1 km/s, compared to 7.5 km/s needed for orbit.

SpaceX characterized the test flight as a success, having flight proven over 95% of Falcon 1's systems. Their primary objectives for this launch were to test responsive launch procedures and gather data.[32] The SpaceX team planned both a diagnosis and solution vetted by third party experts, believing that the slosh issue could be corrected by adding baffles to the second stage LOX tank and adjusting the control logic. Furthermore, the Merlin shutdown transient was to be addressed by initiating shutdown at a much lower thrust level, albeit at some risk to engine reusability. The SpaceX team wished to work on the problem to avoid a recurrence as they changed over into the operational phase for Falcon 1.[46]

Third flight

Main articles: Trailblazer (satellite), NanoSail-D, and PRESat

SpaceX attempted the third Falcon 1 launch on August 3, 2008 (GMT) from Kwajalein.[47] This flight carried the Trailblazer (Jumpstart-1) satellite for the US Air Force,[48] the NanoSail-D and PREsat nanosatellites for NASA and a space burial payload for Celestis.[49] The rocket did not reach orbit. However, the first stage, with the new Merlin 1C engine, performed perfectly.[50]

When preparing for launch, an earlier launch attempt was delayed by the unexpected slow loading of helium onto the Falcon 1; thus exposing the fuel and oxidizer to the cryogenic helium, rendering the vehicle in a premature launch state. Still within the specified window, the launch attempt was recycled, but aborted half a second before lift-off because of a sensor misreading. The problem was resolved, and the launch was again recycled. With twenty-five minutes left in the launch window, the Falcon 1 lifted off from Omelek Island at 03:35 UTC. During the launch, small vehicle roll oscillations were visible.

Stage separation occurred as planned, but because residual fuel in the new Merlin 1C engine evaporated and provided transient thrust, the first stage recontacted the second stage, preventing successful completion of the mission.[51]

The SpaceX flight 3 mission summary indicated that flight 4 would take place as planned and that the failure of flight 3 did not make any technology upgrades necessary. A longer time between first stage engine shutdown and stage separation was declared to be enough.[34]

The full video of the third launch attempt was made public by SpaceX a few weeks after the launch.[52]

Fourth flight

The second stage Kestrel engine glows red hot during Falcon 1's fourth launch and first successful orbital flight.
Main article: Ratsat

The fourth flight of the Falcon 1 rocket successfully flew on September 28, 2008, delivering a 165-kilogram (363-pound) non-functional boilerplate spacecraft into low Earth orbit.[36]

Fifth flight

Main article: RazakSAT

SpaceX announced that it had completed construction of the 5th Falcon 1 rocket and was transporting the vehicle to the Kwajalein Atoll launch complex where it was to be launched on April 21, 2009, which would be April 20, 2009 in the United States.[53] Less than a week before the scheduled launch date, Malaysian news reported that unsafe vibration levels had been detected in the rocket and repairs were expected to take about six weeks.[54]

On April 20, 2009 SpaceX announced in a press release, that the launch has been postponed because of a potential compatibility issue between the RazakSAT spacecraft and Falcon 1 launch vehicle. A concern has been identified regarding the potential impact of predicted vehicle environments on the satellite.[55]

On June 1, SpaceX announced that the next launch window would open Monday, July 13 and extend through Tuesday, July 14, with a daily window to open at 21:00 UTC (09:00 local time/4:00 p.m. PDT[56]).

The launch on Monday, July 13 was successful, placing RazakSAT into its initial parking orbit. Thirty-eight minutes later, the rocket's second-stage engine fired again to circularize the orbit. The payload was then successfully deployed.[57]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b International Astronautical Federation, United Nations. Office for Outer Space Affairs, International Institute of Space Law (1 Jan 2006). Highlights in Space 2005: Progress in Space Science, Technology and Applications, International Cooperation and Space Law. United Nations Publications. p. 11. ISBN 978-9211009897.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ a b c "Falcon 1". Space Exploration Technologies Corporation. Archived from the original on 14 September 2010. Retrieved 14 September 2010.
  3. ^ Engel, Max (2013-03-01). "Launch Market on Cusp of Change". Satellite Today. Retrieved 2013-02-15. SpaceX is not the first private company to try to break through the commercial space launch market. The company, however, appears to be the real thing. Privately funded, it had a vehicle before it got money from NASA, and while NASA's space station resupply funds are a tremendous boost, SpaceX would have existed without it.
  4. ^ a b Vance, Ashlee (2015). Elon Musk : Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future. New York: HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-230123-9.
  5. ^ Maney, Kevin (2005-06-17). "Private sector enticing public into final frontier". USAtoday.com.
  6. ^ a b Hoffman, Carl (2007-05-22). "Elon Musk Is Betting His Fortune on a Mission Beyond Earth's Orbit". Wired Magazine. Retrieved 2014-03-14.
  7. ^ "Orbital Marks 25th Anniversary Of Company's Founding" (Press release). Orbital Sciences. 2007-04-02.
  8. ^ "Commercial Market Assessment for Crew and Cargo Systems" (pdf). nasa.gov. NASA. 2011-04-27. p. 40. Retrieved 10 June 2015. SpaceX has publicly indicated that the development cost for Falcon 9 launch vehicle was approximately $300 million. Additionally, approximately $90 million was spent developing the Falcon 1 launch vehicle which did contribute to some extent to the Falcon 9, for a total of $390 million. NASA has verified these costs.
  9. ^ "Falcon 1 Reaches Space But Loses Control and is Destroyed on Re-Entry". Satnews.com. 2007-03-21.
  10. ^ Graham Warwick and Guy Norris, "Blue Sky Thinking: DARPA at 50," Aviation Week & Space Technology, Aug 18-25 2008, page 18.
  11. ^ TacSat-1
  12. ^ "Report: Pentagon cancels TacSat-1 launch". August 18, 2007. Retrieved July 15, 2011.
  13. ^ Musk, Elon. "June 2005 through September 2005 Update". SpaceX News. SpaceX. Retrieved 14 November 2016.
  14. ^ a b c "Falcon 1 Overview". SpaceX. Retrieved 2007-05-05.
  15. ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ab2VVp1GfmA
  16. ^ a b c d e f g Bjelde, Brian; Max Vozoff; Gwynne Shotwell (August 2007). "The Falcon 1 Launch Vehicle: Demonstration Flights, Status, Manifest, and Upgrade Path". 21st Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites (SSC07 ‐ III ‐ 6). Retrieved 2013-12-06.
  17. ^ "Falcon 1 Flight Three Press Kit" (PDF). SpaceX. Retrieved 2008-09-30.
  18. ^ "Falcon 1". Encyclopedia Astronautica. Space Daily. Retrieved 15 July 2015.
  19. ^ a b Brown, Mary Beth (2005-09-08). "SpaceX Announces the Falcon 9 Fully Reusable Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle" (Press release). El Segundo, CA: SpaceX. Retrieved 2009-11-04.
  20. ^ a b c d Clarke, Stephen (2008-09-28). "Sweet success at last for Falcon 1 rocket". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 2009-11-04.
  21. ^ SpaceX, Falcon 1 Overview: Pricing and Performance (website viewed 31 Aug. 2010)
  22. ^ "$5900000 in 2005 dollars". Wolfram Alpha. 2009-08-12.
  23. ^ Malik, Tariq (2006-03-24). "SpaceX's Inaugural Falcon 1 Rocket Lost Just After Launch". Space.com.
  24. ^ Jessy Xavier, "Europes First Vega Rocket Blasts Off Successfully," Oregon Herald, February 13, 2012
  25. ^ "Virgin Galactic relaunches its smallsat launch business". NewSpace Journal. 2012-07-12. Retrieved 2012-07-11. Several years ago, SpaceX was going to open up the smallsat launch market with the Falcon 1, which originally was to launch about 600 kilograms to LEO for $6 million; the payload capacity later declined to about 420 kilograms as the price increased to around $9 million. Later, the Falcon 1e was to provide approximately 1,000 kilograms for $11 million, but the company withdrew the vehicle from the market, citing limited demand.
  26. ^ Berger, Brian (January 9, 2006). "SpaceX To Try Again Feb. 9". Space News. Archived from the original on 2006-03-08. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  27. ^ Kelly, John (2007-04-25). "SpaceX cleared for Cape launches". Florida Today.
  28. ^ "SpaceX Falcon 1 Data Sheet" (PDF). SpaceX. 2008-09-28.
  29. ^ "Falcon 1 Users Guide" (PDF). SpaceX. 2008-09-28.
  30. ^ Clark, Stephen (July 14, 2009). "Commercial launch of SpaceX Falcon 1 rocket a success". Spaceflight Now.
  31. ^ Junod, Tom (2012-11-15). "Triumph of His Will". long form article. Esquire. Retrieved 2014-03-13.
  32. ^ a b "Demo Flight 2 Flight Review Update" (PDF). SpaceX. June 15, 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 3, 2008. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  33. ^ Clark, Stephen (2008-08-03). "Falcon 1 suffers another setback". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 2008-08-05.
  34. ^ a b "Flight 3 mission summary". Space Exploration Technologies Corporation.
  35. ^ a b "Launch Manifest". SpaceX. Retrieved 2008-08-03.
  36. ^ a b "Flight 4 Launch Update". SpaceX. 23 September 2008.
  37. ^ "SPACEX And ATSB Announce New Launch Date For Razaksat Satellite" (Press release). SpaceX. 2009-06-01. Retrieved 2009-06-02.
  38. ^ Clark, Stephen (July 14, 2009). "Commercial launch of SpaceX Falcon 1 rocket a success". Spaceflight Now.
  39. ^ "ORBCOMM and SpaceX Reach Deal To Launch Satellite Constellation" (Press release). SpaceX. 2009-09-03. Retrieved 2009-09-03.
  40. ^ "Someone's looking out for that satellite…". Kwajalein Atoll and Rockets. 2006-03-25.
  41. ^ "Falcon 1 Failure Traced to a Busted Nut". Space.com. 2006-07-19.
  42. ^ "Demo flight two update". Space.com. 2007-01-19.
  43. ^ "SpaceX Confirms Stage Bump On Demoflight 2".
  44. ^ a b "Mission Status Center". Space Flight Now. 2007-03-20.
  45. ^ "Falcon I flight - preliminary assessment positive for SpaceX". NASAspaceflight.com. 2007-03-24.
  46. ^ "SpaceX Declares Falcon 1 Rocket Operational Despite Less than Perfect Test". space.com. 2007-03-28.
  47. ^ "SpaceX Falcon 1's Third Launch Ends In Failure". 2008-08-03. Retrieved 2008-08-03.
  48. ^ "SpaceX conducts static test firing of next Falcon 1 rocket". SpaceX. Retrieved 2008-06-26.
  49. ^ "The Explorers Flight". Space Services Incorporated (Celestis). Retrieved 2008-06-05.
  50. ^ Falcon Launch Video and Message from Elon Musk | NASA Watch
  51. ^ "SpaceX Telecon on Falcon 1 Launch Failure". NASA Watch. 6 August 2008.
  52. ^ The full video of the third launch attempt including separation failure
  53. ^ Musk, Elon (March 17, 2009). "Flight 4 Launch Update". Updates. SpaceX. Retrieved 2008-09-23.
  54. ^ "Launch of RazakSAT postponed". The Star. April 18, 2009.
  55. ^ "Launch of RazakSAT postponed". SpaceX. April 20, 2009.
  56. ^ "SpaceX sets Falcon 1 Launch for July 13". Parabolic Arc. June 2, 2009.
  57. ^ [1]

Further reading

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Falcon 1.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Falcon_1&oldid=749492660"