Hagwon (Korean pronunciation: [hagwʌn]) is the Korean-language word for a for-profit private institute, academy or cram school prevalent in South Korea. Although most widely known for their role as "cram schools", where children can study to improve scores, hagwon actually perform several educational functions: they provide supplementary education that many children need just to keep up with the regular school curriculum, remedial education for the children who fall behind in their work, training in areas not covered in schools, and preparation for students striving to improve test scores and preparing for the high school and university entrance examinations (the university entrance exam is also called suneung (수능)). Many other children, particularly younger children, attend nonacademic hagwon for piano lessons, art instruction, swimming, and taekwondo (태권도). Most young children attend a hagwon. Hagwon also play a social role; occasionally children ask to be sent because their friends attend. There also exist hagwon for adults, such as flower arrangement and driving instruction hagwon. The term is also sometimes used to describe similar institutions operated by Korean Americans in the United States.
Children of all ages often attend hagwon, even those in the pre-school age bracket. It is not uncommon for students to be enrolled in several hagwon of different subject areas at once in addition to their normal school attendance. Hagwon often specialize in subjects like mathematics, foreign languages, science, arts, or music. Many hagwon also have adults as students, particularly those dedicated to teaching the English language.
In 2008, it was reported that there were over 70,000 hagwon in South Korea with 47 percent of them focused on high school enrollment.
History and regulations
In 1885, Henry Appenzeller founded the Paichai school (배재대학교) as a cover for his missionary work. At the time it was illegal to preach other religions in Korea. Although his main goal was to spread his faith, it was still used by Koreans to learn English.
Private education, known as gwaoe (과외), was banned by President Chun Doo-hwan (전두환) in 1980. It was felt the advantage of private education unfairly burdened the poor and to promote equality, all access to it was made illegal. Through the years the government has relaxed the restrictions on private education by increasingly allowing more individuals and organizations to offer private education until the ban was ruled unconstitutional in the 1990s.
Korean courts have ruled that it may violate the constitution for the government to limit the amount of money hagwon can charge. In early 2008, the Seoul government was working on changes to the regulations to allow hagwons to set their own hours, citing individual choice as trumping regulation. However, the government reversed its position five days later. The regulations were criticized as ineffective because the city council possessed limited resources to monitor and enforce them. Along with these restrictions, hagwon also had to disclose their tuition amounts to the government so people could complain if the schools attempted to raise the tuition. The licenses of hagwon caught running false advertisements will be revoked. Hagwon are required to issue cash receipts. In July 2009, to help catch violators of these new regulations, the government started a program to reward people who reported them. The regulations were intended to reduce the cost of private education. However, some hagwon added weekend classes to compensate for shorter weekday classes. Other parents have sought out private tutors to make up for lost study time. Other hagwon simply ignored the regulations. It was reported in April 2009 that 67 percent of hagwon sampled were found to have overcharged for tuition. Forty percent were found to have charged parents over two times the registered tuition amount.
In March 2008, the government prohibited school teachers from creating test questions for hagwons. It had been found that some teachers were leaking tests and test questions to hagwons, giving the students who attended those schools advantages when it came time to take the test.
A petition was made in October 2009 by parents, teachers, students and hagwon owners to challenge the government's legislation regarding hagwon closing times in Seoul and Busan. The constitutional court ruled that the laws did not violate the constitution. The restriction was put in place for Seoul and Busan in the summer of 2009. In making the ruling the court said, "Because it’s important to secure sleep for high school students to overcome fatigue and for the sake of their growth, it’s difficult to say that [the ban] excessively restricts basic rights."
In April 2010 it was reported that there were over 25,000 hagwon registered with the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education, with nearly 6,000 being in the Gangnam area. It was also revealed that local government councils other than Seoul had decided not to implement the 22:00 curfew. The curfew was seen as not having an impact on education fees and not addressing the real concern with private education. Despite the curfew, there have been attempts to get around this curfew among hagwon in Seoul.
Impact on real estate
A higher than average concentration of hagwon in the Gangnam-gu (강남구) area, specifically Daechi-dong (대치동), has been cited as the primary reason for an increase in real estate costs in the area. In the 1970s the Seoul government made some top schools relocate to the area; however, the schools there have become associated with entry into elite high schools and then elite universities. Many residents feel their children need to be associated with these schools in order to reach the upper levels of business and success. As more parents try to move to the area to allow their children to attend these schools, the prices of real estate in the area have risen to 300 percent of similar areas in Seoul. In 2003 the government had planned to develop a hagwon center in Pangyo to relieve some of the pressure on Gangnam, yet after heavy criticism for only shifting the problem around and not solving it, the government canceled the plan only a couple weeks later.
Native English speakers were hired as early as 1883 in Korea, originally out of need. The first teacher hired at the government-run Tongmunhak was Thomas Hallifax. Due to the preference for having native English speakers teach English, many native English-speakers are still hired to teach at hagwons in Korea. These hagwons may be only English schools or they could also be schools which have a variety of subjects including English. The minimum requirements for foreigners for such teaching positions are: citizenship of Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, South Africa, the United Kingdom, or the United States, a clean criminal background check at the national level, and a bachelor's degree obtained in one of the aforementioned countries. In return for signing a one-year contract, the institute provides an instructor with a monthly salary, round-trip airfare from his or her country of origin, usually a rent-free apartment or housing stipend for the duration of the instructor's contract, and an additional one-month "severance pay" at the completion of the contract.
In some English-speaking countries, hagwon exist for ethnic Koreans. In North America, about 75% of Korean-language supplemental schools have affiliation with churches. As of 2006, of the hagwon registered with the Korean School Association of America (KSAA), over 75% were affiliated with Korean churches. There are also secular formal hagwon and secular informal hagwon. The hagwon are equivalent to hoshū jugyō kō (hoshūkō) in ethnic Japanese communities and buxiban in ethnic Chinese communities. As of 2010, every year over 50,000 Korean Americans attend Korean heritage schools.
Korean schools were first established in Hawaii after 1903, when the first wave of Korean immigration came to the United States. The modern generation of Korean supplemental schools were first established in the United States in the 1970s. At the time they were weekend schools that had a mission to preserve the Korean-American identity in its students. They taught the Korean language, managed the assimilation of Korean-American children, and offered afterschool tutoring programs. There were almost 500 schools registered with the KSAA by the end of the 1980s. Beginning in the 1990s there were also hagwon that were supplementary academic preparation programs like the ones in Korea.
Kang Hee-Ryong, author of the PhD thesis White supremacy, racialization, and cultural politics of Korean Heritage Language Schools, wrote that the Korean heritage schools are "not simply a means of counter hegemony against the racializing forces" but instead the "product of compromises" between different generations of Korean Americans.
- Kang, Hee-Ryong (University of Wisconsin-Madison). White supremacy, racialization, and cultural politics of Korean Heritage Language Schools (PhD thesis). 2010. ISBN 112454688X.
- Zhou, Min, & Kim, Susan S. (University of California, Los Angeles). "Community forces, social capital, and educational achievement: The case of supplementary education in the Chinese and Korean immigrant communities" (Archive). Harvard Educational Review, 2006. 76 (1), 1-29.
- Kim, K. K. (2007). Jaemihanin Minjokkyooke Kwanhan Yongoo (A Study on the Development of the Ethnic Education for Koreans in the United States). The Korea Educational Review, 13 (1), 57-87.
- Ashley Dunn (28 January 1995). "Cram Schools: Immigrants' Tools for Success". New York Times. Retrieved 28 August 2009.
- Daniel Yi (17 July 2002). "Using Summer to Spring Ahead for the Fall". LA Times. Retrieved 29 August 2009.
- "South Koreans' Zeal for English Leads to Abuse of 'Hagwon' System". Yonhap News. 4 March 2005. Retrieved 29 August 2009.
- Hyun-Sung Khang (8 June 2001). "Education-Obsessed South Korea". Radio Netherlands Worldwide. Retrieved 29 August 2009.[permanent dead link]
- Andrei Lankov (1 January 2009). "(509) Gangnam Fever". Korea Times. Retrieved 29 August 2009.
- Kim See-bong (23 January 2008). "Are They Criminals?". Korea Times. Retrieved 30 August 2009.
- Moon Gwang-lip (15 December 2009). "Statistics paint Korean picture". Joongang Daily. Retrieved 10 February 2010.
- Andrei Lankov (4 October 2009). "(470) Original English Boom". Korea Times. Retrieved 1 September 2009.
- Casey Lartigue (28 May 2000). "You'll Never Guess What South Korea Frowns Upon". The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 August 2009.
- James Card (30 November 2005). "Life and death exams in South Korea". Asia Times. Retrieved 29 August 2009.
- Yoon Ja-young (13 August 2009). "Cost of Daily Necessities Soaring". Korea Times. Retrieved 28 August 2009.
- Bae Ji-sook (13 March 2008). "Should Hagwon Run Round-the-Clock?". Korea Times. Retrieved 30 August 2009.
- Kim Tae-jong (18 March 2008). "Seoul City Council Cancels All-Night Hagwon Plan". Korea Times. Retrieved 30 August 2009.
- Kim Tae-jong (26 October 2008). "Hagwon Easily Dodge Crackdown". Korea Times. Retrieved 30 August 2009.
- Kang Shin-who (28 October 2008). "Hagwon Face Sterner Supervision". Korea Times. Retrieved 30 August 2009.
- Kang Shin-who (19 October 2008). "Rules Toughtened for Hagwon Operation". Korea Times. Retrieved 30 August 2009.
- sshluck (14 August 2009). "Lee seeks to cut educational costs". KoreaHerald. Retrieved 28 August 2009.
- Lee Soo-yeon (17 August 2009). "Hagwon close, but late-night education goes on". Joongang Daily. Retrieved 28 August 2009.
- Kang Shin-who (14 April 2009). "67 Percent of Private Cram Schools Overcharge Parents". Korea Times. Retrieved 30 August 2009.
- Kang Shin-who (23 March 2008). "Teachers Banned From Making Test Questions for Hagwon". Korea Times. Retrieved 29 August 2009.
- Park Yu-mi, Kim Mi-ju (31 October 2009). "Despite protests, court says hagwon ban is constitutional". Joongang Daily. Retrieved 6 November 2009.CS1 maint: Uses authors parameter (link)
- kswho (8 July 2009). "'Hagwon' Curfew to Be Set at 10 pm". Korea Times. Retrieved 6 November 2009.
- Park Su-ryon (9 April 2010). "Gangnam scores for most hagwon, closures". Joongang Daily. Retrieved 9 July 2010.
- Kang Shin-who (1 April 2010). "'Hagwon' Curfew Backsliding". Korea Times. Retrieved 9 July 2010.
- Kim (김), Hye-yeong (혜영) (11 March 2011). 학원, 대놓고 수업하는 곳은 없지만 10시 넘자 셔터 내리고 '보충'. Hankook Ilbo (in Korean). Archived from the original on 19 March 2012. Retrieved 2011-03-30.
- Lee Sang-geon, Kim Myeong-ryong (12 June 2003). "An address some people will die for". Joongang Daily. Retrieved 29 August 2009.
- Choe Yong-shik (15 September 2003). "Plan for satellite 'hagwon' town under fire". Korea Herald. Retrieved 29 August 2009.
- entropy (27 September 2003). "Gov't Scraps Plan to Build Private Institute Zone in Pangyo". Yonhap News. Retrieved 29 August 2009.
- "Foreign Language teaching (E-2)". Government of Korea. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
- Yoon Won-sup; Kang Shin-who (20 January 2008). "Envoys Criticize Teaching-Visa Rule". Koreatimes. Archived from the original on 21 January 2008. Retrieved 25 June 2011.
- YOAV CERRALBO (30 May 2005). "The good, the bad and the hagwon". CBC. Archived from the original on 26 August 2010. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
- Limb Jae-un (8 December 2008). "English teachers complain about certain hagwon". Joongang Daily. Retrieved 31 August 2009.
- Park Si-soo (8 December 2009). "English Teachers Establish Labor Union in Incheon". Korea Times. Retrieved 10 February 2010.
- Hirvela, Alan. "Diverse Literacy Practices among Asian Populations: Implications for Theory and Pedagogy" (Chapter 5). In: Farr, Marcia, Lisya Seloni, and Juyoung Song (editors). Ethnolinguistic Diversity and Education: Language, Literacy and Culture. Routledge, January 25, 2011. Start page 99. ISBN 1135183708, 9781135183707. - Cited: p. 103. "These, too, exist as a result of efforts made by local ethnic communities. Chinese (buxiban) and Korean (hagwon) schools are the most dominant of these learning environments, while Japanese heritage schools (hoshuko) also exist in certain communities." and "[...]while the large majority (around 75 percent) of Korean schools are affiliated with churches; these began to appear in the early 1970s (Zhou & Kim, 2006)."
- Zhou and Kim, p. 12
- Kang, p. 1.
- Kang, p. 2.
- Zhou and Kim, p. 13