Historicity of King Arthur

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Arthur's Tomb, a watercolour of 1855 by Dante Gabriel Rossetti.

The historical basis for King Arthur is a source of considerable debate among historians. Due to the paucity of British records from the period 450–550, historian Thomas Charles-Edwards noted that "at this stage of the enquiry, one can only say that there may well have been a historical Arthur [but] the historian can as yet say nothing of value about him."[1] Historian David Dumville summed up his position: "I think we can dispose of [Arthur] quite briefly. He owes his place in our history books to a 'no smoke without fire' school of thought ... The fact of the matter is that there is no historical evidence about Arthur; we must reject him from our histories and, above all, from the titles of our books."[2]

Some have suggested that Arthur was a mythological or folklore figure, and that other mythological figures also may have become historicised: one suggestion is that Hengist and Horsa were originally Kentish totemic horse-gods, ascribed a historical role by Bede.[3]

Arthur appears in a historical context as a British soldier (miles in the original Latin) fighting alongside British kings against the invading Saxons in a Latin text of the 9th century, more than three centuries after his supposed period of activity in 5th-6th century Sub-Roman Britain. The legendary king of the Britons of the Matter of Britain develops from the 12th century after Geoffrey of Monmouth's influential Historia Regum Britanniae.

Name "Arthur"[edit]

The etymology of the Welsh name Arthur is uncertain, though most scholars favour either a derivation from the Roman gentile name Artorius (ultimately of Messapic or Etruscan origin), or a native Brittonic compound based on the root *arto- 'bear' (which became arth in Medieval and Modern Welsh). Similar 'bear' names appear throughout the Celtic-speaking world. Those that favor a mythological origin for Arthur point out that a Gaulish bear goddess, Artio, is attested, but as yet no certain examples of Celtic male bear gods have been detected.

John Morris argues that the appearance of the name Arthur, as applied to the Scottish and Welsh figures by this name, and the lack of the name at any time earlier, suggests that in the early 6th century the name became popular amongst the indigenous British for a short time. He proposes that all of these occurrences were due to the importance of another Arthur, who may have ruled temporarily as Emperor of Britain.[4] He suggests on the basis of archaeology that a period of Saxon advance was halted and turned back, before resuming again in the 570s. Ignoring the phonological and historical difficulties, Morris also suggests that the Roman Camulodunum, modern Colchester, and capital of the Roman province of Britannia, is the origin of the name "Camelot".

The Old Irish version of the name, Artúr (which was borrowed by Irish speakers from the Britons), is frequently attested in southern Scotland in the 7th and 8th centuries.[5] For example, Artúr mac Conaing,[6] who may have been named after his uncle Artúr mac Áedáin. Artúr son of Bicoir "the Briton" was another reported in this period, who slew Mongán mac Fiachnai of Ulster in 620/625 in Kintyre.[7] A man named Feradach, apparently the grandson of one Artuir, was a signatory at the synod that enacted the Law of Adomnan in 697.[7] Arthur ap Pedr was a prince in Dyfed, born around 570–580.[8] Given the popularity of this name at the time, it is likely that others were named for a figure who was already established in regional history or folklore by that time.

Early sources[edit]

Gildas and Badon[edit]

Writing in the early 6th century, the British cleric Gildas is the first to mention (in his book De Excidio Britanniae) the British victory against the Saxons at the "Badonic mount" (Latin mons Badonicus), the Battle of Badon, which occurred in the year of his birth and ushered in a generation of peace between the two warring peoples (he describes the battle as taking place "in our times" and being one of the "latest, if not the greatest", slaughter of the Saxons, and that, at the time of his writing, a new generation born after Badon, has come of age in Britain). Later Cambro-Latin sources, such as the Historia Brittonum and Annales Cambriae give the Old Welsh form of the battle's location, Badon, which has been adopted by most modern scholars.[9]

Gildas' Latin is somewhat opaque: he does not name Arthur, or any other leader of the battle. He does discuss Ambrosius Aurelianus as a great scourge of the Saxons immediately prior,[9] but seems to say some time passed between Ambrosius' victory and the battle of Badon. The date of the battle is uncertain, with most scholars accepting a date around 500. The location is also unknown, though numerous locations across Britain have been proposed over the years.

Historia Brittonum[edit]

Arthur is not mentioned in Bede's Historia ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum (Ecclesiastical History of the English People) (c. 731), which made extensive use of Gildas' De Excidio Britanniae, or any other surviving work until circa 829, the date ascribed to the Historia Brittonum, usually attributed to Nennius, a Welsh ecclesiastic.[10] Historia Brittonum lists twelve battles fought by Arthur and gives him the title of dux bellorum, which can be translated as 'war commander', saying that Arthur fought "alongside the kings of the Britons", rather than that Arthur was himself a king. Other accounts associating Arthur with one of those battles, that of Mount Badon, can be shown to derive directly or indirectly from the Historia Brittonum. The list is inserted between the death of Hengist (himself possibly a legendary rather than historical figure) and the reign of Ida in Bernicia, which suggests that the Historia Brittonum's compiler believed Arthur's floruit to have been some time between the late 5th and early 6th century.

Annales Cambriae[edit]

The Annales Cambriae (the earliest version of which was composed in the mid-10th century) give the date of Badon as 516, and Arthur's death as occurring in 537 at the Battle of Camlann. These annals survive in a version dating from the 10th century. All other sources relating to Arthur by name are later than these; that is, they were written at least four hundred years later than the events to which they refer.[11]

Historia Regum Britanniae[edit]

Written c. 1136 and drawing from Gildas' De Excidio Britanniae, the Historia Brittonum, and Annales Cambriae, among other sources, Geoffrey of Monmouth's fictional chronicle of the kings of Britain, Historia Regum Britanniae, places Arthur - for the first time styled a king of the Britons - in the early- to mid-sixth century. Geoffrey makes Ambrosius Aurelianus (whom he calls Aurelius Ambrosius) a king of Britain, an older brother of Uther Pendragon, the father of Arthur, thus relating Aurelianus and Arthur. He also states that Aurelius Ambrosius was the son of a Breton ruler named Constantinus, brother of Aldroenus.

Legends of the saints[edit]

Arthur is mentioned in several 12th to 13th century saints' lives, including those of Cadoc, Carantoc, Gildas, Goeznovius, Illtud, and Paternus. The Legenda Sancti Goeznovii is a hagiography of the Breton saint Goeznovius which was formerly dated to circa 1019,[12] but now dated to the late 12th to early 13th century,[13] includes a brief segment dealing with Arthur and Vortigern.[14]

Bardic sources[edit]

There are a number of mentions of a legendary hero called Arthur in early Welsh and Breton poetry. These sources are preserved in High Medieval manuscripts and cannot be dated with accuracy. They are mostly placed in the 9th to 10th century, although some authors make them as early as the 7th. The earliest of these would appear to be the Old Welsh poem Y Gododdin, preserved in an 13th-century manuscript. It refers to a warrior who "glutted black ravens [i.e., killed many men] on the rampart of the stronghold, although he was no Arthur."[11]

The Welsh poem Geraint, son of Erbin, written in the 10th or 11th century, describes a battle at a port-settlement and mentions Arthur in passing.[15] The work is a praise-poem and elegy for King Geraint, usually presumed to be a historical king of Dumnonia, and is significant in showing that he was associated with Arthur at a relatively early date.[15] It also provides the earliest known reference to Arthur as "emperor".[15] Geraint son of Erbin is found in the Black Book of Carmarthen,[16] compiled around 1250, though it may date to the 10th or 11th century.[15] Y Gododdin was similarly copied around the same time. The two poems differ in the relative archaic quality of their language, that of Gododdin being the older in form. However, this could merely reflect differences in the date of the last revision of the language within the two poems. The language would have had to have been revised for the poems to remain comprehensible.

Alternative candidates for the historical King Arthur[edit]

Some theories suggest that "Arthur" was a byname of attested historical individuals.

Lucius Artorius Castus and the Sarmatian connection[edit]

One theory suggests that Lucius Artorius Castus, a Roman military commander who served in Britain in the late 2nd century or early 3rd century, was a prototype of Arthur.[17][18] Artorius is known from two inscriptions that give details about his service. After a long career as a centurion in the Roman army, he was promoted to prefect of Legio VI Victrix, a legion headquartered in Eboracum (present-day York, England).[19][20][21] He later commanded two British legions on an expedition against either the Armoricans (in present-day Brittany) or the Armenians.[22][23] He subsequently became civilian governor of Liburnia in modern Croatia, where he died.[20]

Kemp Malone first made the connection between Artorius and King Arthur in 1924. Noting that the Welsh name Arthur plausibly derives from the Latin Artorius, Malone suggested that details of Castus' biography, in particular his possible campaign in Brittany and the fact that he was obligated to retire from the military (perhaps due to an injury), may have inspired elements of Geoffrey of Monmouth's depiction of King Arthur.[24][25] Later scholars have challenged the idea, based on the fact that Artorius lived two to three centuries before the period typically associated with Arthur, and the fact that the parts of the inscriptions ostensibly similar to Arthur's story are open to interpretation.[26]

Malone's idea attracted little attention for decades, but it was revived in the 1970s as part of a theory known as the "Sarmatian connection".[24] In a 1975 essay, Helmut Nickel suggested that Artorius was the original Arthur, and that a group of Sarmatian cavalry serving under him in Britain inspired the Knights of the Round Table. Nickel wrote that Castus' Sarmatian unit fought under a red dragon banner and that their descendants were still in Britain in the 5th century; he also identified similarities between the Arthurian legend and traditions associated with the Sarmatians and other peoples of the Caucasus region. He suggested that the Sarmatians' descendants kept Castus' legacy alive over the centuries, and mixed it with their ancestral myths involving magical cauldrons and swords.[27]

Independently of Nickel, C. Scott Littleton developed a more elaborate version of the Sarmatian connection. Littleton first wrote about the theory with Anne C. Thomas in 1978, and expanded on it in a 1994 book co-authored by Linda Malcor, From Scythia to Camelot.[28][29][30] Littleton and Malcor argued that Artorius and the Sarmatian cavalry were the inspiration for King Arthur and his knights, but that many elements of Arthur's story derive from Caucasian mythology, ostensibly brought to Britain in the 2nd century by Sarmatians and Alans. They find parallels in the traditions of the Caucasus for key features of the Arthurian legend, including the Sword in the Stone, the Holy Grail, and the return of Arthur's sword to a lake, and connect Arthur and his knights to Batraz and his Narts, the heroes of the legends of the North Caucasus.[28][31]

Some Arthurian scholars have given credence to the Sarmatian connection, but others have found it based on conjecture and weak evidence.[28] Few of the Caucasian traditions cited to support the theory can be traced specifically with the Sarmatians; many are known only from orally transmitted tales that are not datable before they were first recorded in the 19th century.[32][28] Additionally, many of the strongest parallels to the Arthurian legend are not found in the earliest Brittonic materials, but only appear in the later Continental romances of the 12th century or later.[31] As such, the traditions would have had to survive in Britain for at least 1000 years between the arrival of the Sarmatians in the 2nd century, and the Arthurian romances of the 12th century.[28] Nonetheless, the Sarmatian connection continues to have popular appeal; it is the basis of the 2004 film King Arthur.[28]

Riothamus[edit]

Riothamus (also spelled Riotimus) was a historical figure whom ancient sources list as "a king of the Britons". He lived in the late 5th century, and most of the stories about him were recorded in the Byzantine historian Jordanes' The Origin and Deeds of the Goths, written in the mid-6th century, only about 80 years after his presumed death.

About 460, Roman diplomat and bishop Sidonius Apollinaris sent a letter to Riothamus asking his help to quell unrest among the Brettones, British colonists living in Armorica; this letter still survives. In the year 470, Western Emperor Anthemius began a campaign against Euric, king of the Visigoths who were campaigning outside their territory in Gaul. Anthemius requested help from Riothamus, and Jordanes writes that he crossed the ocean into Gaul with 12,000 warriors. The location of Riothamus' army was betrayed to the Visigoths by Arvandus, the jealous praetorian prefect of Gaul, and Euric defeated him in the battle of Déols after Riothamus army was driven from Avaricum (Bourges) where he had been welcomed by the Bituriges before the fight. Riothamus was last seen retreating northward to Burgundy when Euric besieged Arvernum (Clermont-Ferrand) just south of the Bituriges territory.

Geoffrey Ashe points out that Arthur is said by Geoffrey of Monmouth to have crossed into Gaul twice, once to help a Roman emperor and once to subdue a civil war. Riothamus did both, assuming that he was a king in Britain as well as Armorica. Arthur is also said to have been betrayed by one of his advisers, and Riothamus was betrayed by one of his supposed allies. Finally, it is well known how King Arthur was carried off to Avalon (called insula Auallonis by Geoffrey of Monmouth, the first author to mention the legendary isle) before he died; Riothamus, after his defeat at Déols, was last known to have fled to the kingdom of the Germanic Burgundians, perhaps passing through a town called Avallon (though no ancient source on Riothamus mentions him being anywhere in the area of Avallon).

It is unknown whether Riothamus was a king in Britain or Armorica. Armorica was a British colony and Jordanes writes that Riothamus "crossed the ocean", so it is possible that both are correct. The name Riothamus is interpreted by Ashe and some other scholars as a title "High King", though there is no evidence for such a title being used by ancient Britons or Gauls, and the formation of the name (noun/adjective + superlative -tamo- suffix) follows a pattern found in numerous other Brittonic and Gaulish personal names.α Cognates of the name Riothamus survive in Old Welsh (Riatav/Riadaf) and Old Breton (Riatam); all are derived from Common Brittonic *Rigotamos, meaning "Most Kingly", "Kingliest".

Ambrosius Aurelianus[edit]

Ambrosius Aurelianus (also sometimes referred to as Aurelius Ambrosius) was a powerful Romano-British leader in Britain. He was renowned for his campaigns against the Saxons, and there is some speculation that he may have commanded the British forces at the Battle of Badon Hill. At any rate, the battle was a clear continuation of his efforts.

Scholars such as Leon Fleuriot identified Ambrosius Aurelianus with the aforementioned Riothamus figure from Jordanes, an idea which forms part of his hypothesis about the origins of the Arthurian legend.[33] Others, such as Geoffrey Ashe, disagree, since Ambrosius is not called "king" until the somewhat-legendary Historia Brittonum.[34]

Artúr mac Áedáin and others[edit]

Artúr mac Áedáin was the eldest son of Áedán mac Gabráin. He never became king of Dál Riata; his brother Eochaid Buide ruled after their father's death. However, Artúr became war leader when Áedán gave up his role and retired to monastic life, though Áedán was officially still king. Thus it was Artúr who led the Scoti of Dál Riata in a war against the Picts, separate from the later war with Northumbria. Under this hypothesis, Artúr was predominantly active in the region between the Roman walls, the Kingdom of the Gododdin. He was ultimately killed in battle in 582 - thus, he lived far too late to have been the victor at the Battle of Badon, as mentioned by Gildas in the early 6th century. This is the solution proposed by David F. Carroll (in his book Arturius: A Quest for Camelot, 1996) and by Michael Wood.[35]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

Examples include: Old Breton/Welsh Cunatam/Cunotami/Condam/Cyndaf (Brittonic *Cunotamos 'Great Dog'), Old Welsh Caurdaf (Brittonic *Kawarotamos 'Great Giant'), Old Welsh/Breton Eudaf/Outham (Brittonic *Awitamos 'Great Will/Desire'), Uuoratam/Gwrdaf (Brittonic *Wortamos 'Supreme'), Old Breton Rumatam (Brittonic *Roimmotamos 'Great Band/Host'), Gwyndaf (Brittonic *Windotamos 'Fairest/Whitest/Holiest One'), Breton Uuentamau (Brittonic *Wenitamaua 'Friendliest', or *Windotamawā 'Little Fairest/Whitest/Holiest (One)').[36]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Charles-Edwards 1991, p. 29
  2. ^ Dumville 1977, pp. 187–88
  3. ^ Green 1998; Padel 1994; Green 2007, chapters five and seven.
  4. ^ Morris, John (1977). The Age of Arthur: A History of the British Isles from 350 to 650. Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom: Phillimore & Co Ltd. 
  5. ^ "The Heroic Age: Artúr mac Aedan of Dalriada". 2001-02-23. Retrieved 2018-07-07. 
  6. ^ Senchus Fer Alban. History of the Men of Scotland [1].
  7. ^ a b Bromwich 1975, pp. 163–181.
  8. ^ Bromwich 1975, pp. 178.
  9. ^ a b Green, Thomas (2008). Concepts of Arthur. Stroud, United Kingdom: Tempus. p. 31. 
  10. ^ Fletcher, Richard (1989). Who's Who in Roman Britain and Anglo-Saxon England. Shepheard-Walwyn. p. 112. ISBN 0-85683-089-5. 
  11. ^ a b Fletcher, Richard (1989). Who's Who in Roman Britain and Anglo-Saxon England. Shepheard-Walwyn. pp. 17–19. ISBN 0-85683-089-5. 
  12. ^ J. S. P. Tatlock, "The Dates of the Arthurian Saints' Legends", Speculum 14. (July 1939:345-365). pp. 349.
  13. ^ Bourgès, André-Yves, "Guillaume le Breton et l'hagiographie bretonne aux XIIe et XIIIe siècles", in: Annales de Bretagne et des pays de l'Ouest, 1995, 102-1, pp. 35-45.
  14. ^ Ashe, Geoffrey (1991). "Legenda Sancti Goeznovii". In Norris J. Lacy. The New Arthurian Encyclopedia. New York City: Garland. pp. 204–205. ISBN 0-8240-4377-4. 
  15. ^ a b c d Bollard, John K. (1994). "Arthur in the Early Welsh Tradition". The Romance of Arthur: An Anthology of Medieval Texts in Translation. Routledge: 11–23. 
  16. ^ Jarman, A.O.H (1982). Llyfr Du Caerfyrddin. Gwasg Prifysgol Cymru. ISBN 0-7083-0629-2. 
  17. ^ Snyder, p. 3, 15–16.
  18. ^ Mallone, Kemp (1925). "Artorius", Modern Philology 22.
  19. ^ Keppie, Lawrence. Legions and Veterans: Roman Army Papers, 1971-2000, Franz Steiner Verlag, 2000, p. 168.
  20. ^ a b Webster, Graham. The Roman Imperial Army of the First and Second Centuries A.D., University of Oklahoma Press, 1998 (3rd ed.), pp. 112–114.
  21. ^ Mommsen, Theodor; Demandt, Barbara; Demandt, Alexander. A History of Rome Under the Emperors. London & New York: Routledge, 1999 (new ed.), pp. 311–312.
  22. ^ Birley, Anthony. The Roman Government of Britain. Oxford U. Press, 2005, p. 355.
  23. ^ Pflaum, Hans-Georg. Les carrières procuratoriennes équestres sous le Haut-Empire romain. Paris, 1960, p. 535
  24. ^ a b Snyder, p. 3.
  25. ^ Malone, Kemp. "Artorius", Modern Philology 23 (1924–1925): 367–374
  26. ^ Halsall, pp. 147–148.
  27. ^ Snyder, pp. 15–16.
  28. ^ a b c d e f Snyder, p. 16.
  29. ^ Littleton, C. Scott; Thomas, Ann C.: "The Sarmatian Connection: New Light on the Origin of the Arthurian and Holy Grail Legends", Journal of American Folklore 91, 1978, pp. 512–527.
  30. ^ Littleton, C. Scott; Malcor, Linda. From Scythia to Camelot: A Radical Reassessment of the Legends of King Arthur, the Knights of the Round Table and the Holy Grail. New York: Garland, 2000.
  31. ^ a b Greene, Caitlin R. (2009) [1998]. "The Historicity and Historicisation of Arthur". www.Arthuriana.co.uk. Retrieved July 6, 2018. 
  32. ^ Halsall, pp. 149–151.
  33. ^ Léon Fleuriot, Les origines de la Bretagne: l'émigration, Paris, Payot, 1980.
  34. ^ Geoffrey Ashe, The Discovery of King Arthur, Guild Publishing, London, 1985.
  35. ^ Wood, Michael (2007). In Search of Myths and Heroes. University of California Press. p. 255. ISBN 978-0-520-25170-0. 
  36. ^ Lambert, Pierre-Yves; Pinault, Georges-Jean. Gaulois et celtique continental, Librairie Droz, 2007, p. 464.

Bibliography[edit]

  • Bromwich, Rachel (1975). "Concepts of Arthur". Studia Celtica 10/11, pp. 163–181.
  • Dumville, David N. (1977). "Sub-Roman Britain: History and Legend", History 62.
  • Green, Thomas (2009 [1998]), "The Historicity and Historicisation of Arthur" (a revised version is included in Concepts of Arthur, below).
  • Green, Thomas (2007), Concepts of Arthur, Stroud: Tempus, ISBN 978-0-7524-4461-1.
  • Padel, O.J. (1994), 'The Nature of Arthur', Cambrian Medieval Celtic Studies, 27, pp. 1-31.
  • Snyder, Christopher A. (2006), "Arthurian Origins" in A History of Arthurian Scholarship, Lacy, Norris J., ed., D. S. Brewer.

External links[edit]