Jump to content

Luandi: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

14 October 2024

10 June 2024

25 October 2023

2 October 2023

12 June 2023

20 April 2023

9 October 2022

8 October 2022

28 September 2022

2 August 2022

30 July 2022

  • curprev 13:2713:27, 30 July 2022 Mrsecurity39 392 talk contribs 3,740 bytes +1 I have, however that isn't a sound counter argument with other words you're stating that you're taking bias in one quote over another.. When one directly comes from Anno Dybo her study and the other is yet to be found on page 9 (that I quoted) so its safe to say you didn't read it yourself? undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 13:0413:04, 30 July 2022 HistoryofIran talk contribs 3,739 bytes +538 rv, sorry, but that made zero sense. The quote is mentioned in the article talk page, where you are yet to participate. Please take your concerns over there undo Tag: Manual revert
  • curprev 13:0013:00, 30 July 2022 Mrsecurity39 392 talk contribs 3,201 bytes +1 Now frankly I'd like to see the page where ano Dybo does state that the Luandi's name to be a loanwoard of Iranic origin and for the page in its most part to be citated, thank you very much. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 12:5812:58, 30 July 2022 Mrsecurity39 392 talk contribs 3,200 bytes +1 Thus , during the period under study , Slavic did not lose the difference in quantity of * a [ a ] < PIE ā , * ō and * o [ 0 ] < PIE * ă , * ŏ ] . Consequently , all early contact data reaffirm the " Altaic - oriented " reconstruction of Proto Turkic . OUig . - Old Uigur PA Proto Altaic Abbreviations CT - Common Turkic LOCH- Late Old Chinese MChin Middle Chinese MIran . -MIr . - Middle Iranian MMo - Middle Mongolian NMo - Northern Mongolian OCH - Old Chinese OInd . - Old Indian OT - Old Turkic undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 12:5612:56, 30 July 2022 Mrsecurity39 392 talk contribs 3,199 bytes +1 I would most certainly say you're fabricating and covering up for Erminwin. As Erminwin had in one of his pervious edits made reference to page 9 I have quoted in part what page 9 of Anno Dybo her study mentions. Here is the continuation : undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 12:5512:55, 30 July 2022 Mrsecurity39 392 talk contribs 3,198 bytes −541 The phonetic peculiarities of Proto - Bulgar / Early Bulgar > Hungarian and Early Bulgar > Slavic adaptation : vowels . Proto - Turkic vowel length was relevant in Pro to - Bulgar and Danube Bulgar ; The Proto - Turkic diphthongue * ia has specific reflexes in Proto - Bulgar , Danube Bulgar , Volga Bulgar inscriptions and Chuvash ; The reflexes of * a and * e can be distinguished from reflexes of * a and * ä in ProtoBulgar , Danube Bulgar and Chuvash . [ Slavic adapted Danube Bulgar a ( < * a , undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 00:3400:34, 30 July 2022 HistoryofIran talk contribs 3,739 bytes +539 I checked the source and it does indeed say what Erminwin is stating. Am I fabricating stuff as well? undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted

29 July 2022

  • curprev 20:1020:10, 29 July 2022 Mrsecurity39 392 talk contribs 3,200 bytes +1 same source, that you're using to fabricate information that ISN'T there, just for your own COI and or political goals. Therefore I'm leaving this on your page and request from you that you stop the purposefully malicious editing to push your own POV based on non existed information.. And ask you to stop using random sources in the hope that no one checks it or that people will forget about it.. I've left this on your wiki page aswell Erminwin. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 20:0920:09, 29 July 2022 Mrsecurity39 392 talk contribs 3,199 bytes +1 You've made multiple edits on the Luandi and have continuesly being making edits on their names supposed Iranic origin by using a source from Anno Dybo, in particular one of Anno Dybo's Turkic studies that doesn't mention anything on the subject of the r(h) wan-de. Her source is a source on TURKIC language comparison, its a source on proto Turkic Reconstruction nothing to do with the Xiongnu as you can see from page 6 to 9. This is the third time in fact that you've continued to edit in her.. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 19:4919:49, 29 July 2022 Mrsecurity39 392 talk contribs 3,198 bytes −541 I shall repeat it once again the source of Anno Dybo doesn't mention anything on the subject of the r(h) wan-de. Her source is a source on TURKIC language comparison, its a source on proto Turkic Reconstruction nothing to do with the Xiongnu as you can see from page 6 to 9. This is the second time Ermwin don't fabricate information that ISN'T there, just for your own COI and or political goals. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

27 July 2022

4 June 2022

11 May 2022

2 April 2022

  • curprev 18:3618:36, 2 April 2022 Mrsecurity39 392 talk contribs 3,176 bytes −412 I shall repeat it once again the source of Anno Dybo doesn't mention anything on the subject of the r(h) wan-de. Her source is a source on TURKIC language comparison, its a source on proto Turkic Reconstruction nothing to do with the Xiongnu as you can see from page 6 to 9. undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

14 February 2022

  • curprev 12:4412:44, 14 February 2022 Erminwin talk contribs 3,588 bytes +412 Undid revision 1066140704 by Mrsecurity39 392 (talk) "Therefore the text isn't sourced and an unrelated source has been put in place" On page 9 of her pdf Dybo wrote: "7. 攣鞮 *r(h)wan dē ‘royal clan of Hsiung-nu’ – Cf. Kh.Saka runde ‘kings’ (NPl of rre ‘king’ < *rwant-)." You can NOT read the Chinese characters 攣鞮? undo Tags: Undo Reverted

17 January 2022

  • curprev 00:4600:46, 17 January 2022 Mrsecurity39 392 talk contribs 3,176 bytes −412 https://kpfu.ru/portal/docs /F230999094/01.pdf Is the source used but neither in this PDF nor in any other of Anno Dybo her Turkic studies does anything of this subject come up. Therefore the text isn't sourced and an unrelated source has been put in place. undo Tags: Reverted references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit

18 June 2021

8 March 2021

30 December 2020

30 October 2020

3 September 2019

10 May 2019

20 April 2019

20 December 2018

26 October 2018

23 July 2017

23 June 2017

6 June 2016

4 January 2016

13 December 2015

2 May 2015

25 March 2014

25 August 2013

18 August 2013

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)