Talk:Jim Banks
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jim Banks article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jim Banks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402134634/http://jgweb.sx.atl.publicus.com/article/20140305/LOCAL0202/140309674 to http://jgweb.sx.atl.publicus.com/article/20140305/LOCAL0202/140309674
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Reverted Controversy Section
[edit]Just came here to add the details reverted in revision 919300755. This does not appear to be WP:OR: while I did not listen to the audio files I read the transcript of the interview and the host ends with the following remark: "We feel we must note that Congressman Banks did not accurately describe The New York Times reporting about Congressman Schiff and the whistleblower's complaint. The Times quoted a spokesman for Congressman Schiff who said Schiff never saw any part of the complaint or knew precisely what the whistleblower would deliver." The reverted content seems accurate. Did the reverter consult any of the citations? Cl.taurus (talk) 22:06, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- You are referring to my reversion of an edit by IP 32.214.158.236 who added a section "Lying to the press", right? Are you saying that there is a reliable source saying that Mr Banks lied, and a reliable source that there's a controversy about it? (In fact you'd need multiple reliable sources if WP:BLPPUBLIC applies.) Yes, I consulted the cite of the Times, though I did not listen to the audio, and do not see the transcript. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 23:00, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Jim Banks
[edit]Was surprised to see the blatant editorializing in the article regarding the political career of the Congressman. Certainly this isn't considered acceptable within Wikipedia or am I wrong.
Update:
Looks like someone got a few of them. Of course there are more. Check under Tenure. Thank you.
2603:6010:750B:BD23:8D15:8A5A:C078:90BF (talk) 20:16, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
2603:6010:750B:BD23:1164:786D:559B:9DE9 (talk) 19:04, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Indiana articles
- Low-importance Indiana articles
- WikiProject Indiana articles
- C-Class US State Legislatures articles
- Low-importance US State Legislatures articles
- WikiProject US State Legislatures articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class U.S. Congress articles
- Low-importance U.S. Congress articles
- WikiProject U.S. Congress persons
- C-Class Environment articles
- Low-importance Environment articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- Low-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles