Jump to content

Talk:2010 Japanese Grand Prix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:2010 Japanese Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk · contribs) 11:13, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will attempt to review this article over the coming days.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 11:13, 29 July 2021 (UTC) Passes the Good Article criteria fairly easily. Would need a copyedit to reach Featured Article status, but not much more. A very well sourced and comprehensive article. Thanks to MWright96 for addressing the few comments I had. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 18:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk03:09, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rain sprays from the safety car's tyres
Rain sprays from the safety car's tyres
  • ... that torrential rain (pictured) meant that some spectators missed out at the 2010 Japanese Grand Prix when the qualifying practice session was delayed until the following day? Source: "Inclement weather continued to disrupt the Saturday's proceedings as qualifying was delayed three times every half an hour while the safety car was deployed several times to assess the conditions before being ultimately rescheduled for Sunday morning by the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA)'s race director Charlie Whiting on safety grounds arising from fading light levels." Reuters, BBC "Local driver Kamui Kobayashi for Sauber said he felt sorry for attendees seated in the grandstands not witnessing any action." Crash
Hamilton in his car
Hamilton in his car
  • ALT1:... that Lewis Hamilton (pictured in car) had to start the 2010 Japanese Grand Prix from five places further back than he qualified after the McLaren mechanics changed his Formula One car's gearbox? Source: "After qualifying, Hamilton was demoted five starting places because McLaren opted to change his gearbox after detecting worsening abnormal gearbox oil pressure in his vehicle during the third practice session that could not be rectified before qualifying." Reuters
Alonso in his car
Alonso in his car
  • ALT2:... that Fernando Alonso (pictured in car) finished third at the 2010 Japanese Grand Prix while his Ferrari teammate Felipe Massa crashed out at the first corner? ESPN, Autosport "Alonso revealed he made a slow getaway but felt his team had to be satisfied with his coming third despite lacking pace: "We saw we were struggling today: in Q1 we were P7, we saw problems also for Felipe in Q2, so it was maybe not an ideal weekend in terms of pace and we lost three points in the championship, but overall we have to be extremely happy."" FIA; "Massa was given less room trying to pass the slow-starting Rosberg and had to drove onto the grass on the track's inside. This caused him to lose control of his car and hit the side of Liuzzi's vehicle." ITV
  • Reviewed: This is my fifth nomination, although I have reviewed several other nominations recently
  • Comment: Article became a good article on 29 July 2021. Would like to request that the hook be reserved for the afternoon of either 29 August, 5 September, or 12 September, as those coincide with the dates of upcoming Grands Prix; or for the morning of 10 October, as that coincides with the currently scheduled date of the 2021 Japanese Grand Prix.

Improved to Good Article status by MWright96 (talk). Nominated by HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) at 06:08, 2 August 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I've made some minor copyedits. I think ALT2 is the best hook - it's about the race, whereas the others are only about preliminary matters. Bahnfrend (talk) 15:40, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To T:DYK/P7