Talk:October 2009 Baghdad bombings
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the October 2009 Baghdad bombings article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A news item involving October 2009 Baghdad bombings was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 26 October 2009. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of October 2009 Baghdad bombings be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Iran may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Comments
[edit]Shame. If this happened in a downtown U.S. city it would already had 5 enormous subpages--78.2.44.176 (talk) 16:52, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Gather sources and write them, then. This article isn't (yet) protected or semi-protected, so unregistered "IP" users like you can edit it right now (though a registered account does have many advantages). --an odd name 02:44, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- It's only been on the main page for two hours. I added what I could and invite 78.2.44.176 to add more. -SusanLesch (talk) 03:31, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- The video footage is truly shocking, anyone got a link?--Sooo Kawaii!!! ^__^ (talk) 14:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- It's only been on the main page for two hours. I added what I could and invite 78.2.44.176 to add more. -SusanLesch (talk) 03:31, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Page moved. No objections after full listing, and it seems to be in line with others, e.g. August 2009 Baghdad bombings. (non-admin closure) — Amakuru (talk) 13:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
25 October 2009 Baghdad bombings → October 2009 Baghdad bombings – Unnecessary day number; shall I say more? George Ho (talk) 00:32, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on October 2009 Baghdad bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091028002247/http://abcnews.go.com:80/International/wireStory?id=8909962 to http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=8909962
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)