Jump to content

Talk:A Better Tomorrow III: Love & Death in Saigon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:A Better Tomorrow 3.jpg

[edit]

Image:A Better Tomorrow 3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:52, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

145-minute version

[edit]

Can anyone provide a citation, from a reliable source, that this version actually exists? The longest version out there at the moment is the 130-minute cut that's been released a few times over the years (including the Taiwanese VHS and a remastered French DVD). The Taiwanese VCD says 145 minutes but it's actually 130. I'm half-convinced the 145-minute cut is apocryphal. -123.168.73.35 (talk) 15:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

15 years later, it seems to be widely accepted that the 145 minute version is apocryphal, so I have updated the page to reflect that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:4808:2950:1100:B49E:48DB:CD35:295E (talk) 18:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mark is back?

[edit]

Didn't he die in the first film? And isn't Chow Yun Fat playing Ken, Mark's twin brother? I'm confused.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.244.11.113 (talk) 03:56, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reason is this...

[edit]

This is before when Mark didn't have his gun-slinging skills. This is before the first two movies in the series, and is waaay back in the beginning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.244.11.113 (talk) 04:16, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The original source of this film?

[edit]

I'm also a crazy fan of these series.
so I can't just sit back and relax like any other one else.
They say there's a novel (written by Tsui Hark) this film is based on.
I really don't want to be a disrupter always saying "citation needed" and bothering someone else and never contributing myself.
But just out of enormous curiosity and love, I wonder what's the ISBN of the book and whether the book is written in Chinese or not.

And there's also a saying that surname of Shing(portrayed by Waise Lee Chi-Hung), the villain of the first part of the series, is Tan.
But I really want to know where did it come from.
What's the source? 221.138.22.184 (talk) 12:08, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 May 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Roman numerals are in the name. This case is similar to Civilization V, where "V" is used instead "5". WP:SILENCE. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:05, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


A Better Tomorrow 3A Better Tomorrow III – Multiple sources use the roman numeral, "III". George Ho (talk) 00:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.