Talk:2011 Al-Nurayn Mosque attack
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 29 July 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Al-Nurayn Mosque to 2011 Al-Nurayn Mosque attack. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Copyright concerns
[edit]Following up on this ANI report of copyright concerns, I popped in on this article at random. This is the first passage I checked:
Night w | Source |
---|---|
No one claimed responsibility for the attack, but newspapers reported that the perpetrators were believed to be militant Jewish settlers.[4] Residents claimed that settlers had also attacked the village in the past, refering to an extremist group amongst the settlers who had previously announced a "price tag" policy whereby Palestinians and their property would be targeted in response to every measure by the Israeli authorities to dismantle settler buildings [1] | No one claimed responsibility but it is believed that militant Jewish settlers carried out the mosque attack. Residents claimed that settlers had also attacked the village in the past. A few years ago extremist fringe elements amongst the settlers, dubbed the “hilltop youth”, announced a “price tag” policy, whereby Palestinians and Palestinian property would be targeted in response to every move by the Israeli authorities to dismantle settler buildings.[2] |
I do not know how extensive problems may be or if there are other problems in the article, but given this passage and the evident history, additional evaluation is needed as well as rewriting in these passages and any others that may similarly follow so closely on their sources. The article is being blanked to prevent display of copyright problems pending investigation. If a WP:CCI is opened, particularly, it may be deleted after a week if alternative text is not proposed in the temporary space now linked from the article's face. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:51, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- Rewrite now on Talk:Al-Nurayn Mosque/Temp. Nightw 12:20, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Requested move 29 July 2022
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. To better reflect the scope of the article (the attack). (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:55, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Al-Nurayn Mosque → 2011 Al-Nurayn Mosque attack – This article seems either mislabelled, or possible it was created as one thing and became another. As it stands, 90% of the material is on the 2011 arson attack, not the mosque itself. Even if there are sources that would support an article on the mosque, it would seem to make sense to rename and rescope this particular page (and the material it currently contains) to solely and clearly reflect the attack from start to finish, and, if someone wants recreate a new article on the mosque in the future (and they can find sufficient sourcing to create a body of content on the building), they can do so at the redirect. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support – I don't see why it shouldn't be renamed. 92% of the article is about the 2011 attack. Kakebiten (talk) 17:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Against It should be kept under its current name, to moved is stupid. Catfurball (talk) 21:16, 29 July 2022 (UTC)