From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Mountains (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Peru (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pyramid of Ice?[edit]

Is that big pyramid really ice or, as "alpamayo" suggests, earthen with an icy coating? Sfahey 16:48, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

It read "pyramid of ice" since the article was created. I would think it's safe to say it's a mountain made up of rocks and not an iceblock. Also, on the picture you can see rock surface on a few points on the mountain. How do you want to reword it? Lukas 00:03, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Having climbed the SW face in 2001 I can add that it is indeed ice on top of rock. Though on the summit ridge we only found ice, so perhaps the very top of the mountain is JUST ice. Nice route though. John Clarke (UK) —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 11:38, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

  • It's the Paramount logo mountain. Not kidding you! (talk) 22:11, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I'd argue Alpa Mayo deserves a High importance rating, not for its climbing importance, even though it is an insanely popular climb, but it is well known, with many products named after it, and it has been named the "most beautiful mountain of the world".

However, it is not the Paramount logo mountain, that's Artesonraju, which is nearby and is about the same elevation. There is a picture on the page that someone wrote is Artesonraju, it might be, I'm one of the few people who have been in the range without seeing it... --Kjetil Kjernsmo (talk) 20:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Artesonraju does look like Paramount logo mountain, and I usually tell people that it is. However I have read that Paramount simply made up a picture of an idealised mountain & hadn't heard of Artesonraju when the logo was made. John Clarke (UK). —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 11:42, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


Anyone have Prominence for this mountain?

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alpamayo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:28, 2 July 2017 (UTC)