Talk:An Elephant Makes Love to a Pig

An Elephant Makes Love to a Pig has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

An Elephant Makes Love to a Pig is part of the South Park (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 13, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
February 5, 2010	Featured topic candidate	Not promoted
March 6, 2010	Featured topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Animation: American / Television / Computer Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Park Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Park, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South Park on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South ParkWikipedia:WikiProject South ParkTemplate:WikiProject South ParkSouth Park articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Animation / Television / Colorado Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to improve, create, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the New section tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Picture[edit]

Will someone please put a picture of Stan getting hurt by Shelley? It would make the article WAY more interesting. FictionH 23:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Southpark ep105 2.jpg[edit]

Image:Southpark ep105 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal[edit]

Does this article pass the notability test? Alastairward (talk) 16:08, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, it doesnt. -- The Red Pen of Doom 18:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See This page to discuss about the merger. --Gman124^talk 16:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge per excellent work done by Hunter Kahn (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 02:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:An Elephant Makes Love to a Pig/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CTJF83 chat 08:57, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NFCC remove at least one, if not both pictures ie 3 and 8
- Dropped one. — Hunter Kahn _(c) 22:21, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"and steals a blood sample from Stan and the boys flee" are they hastily fleeing due to Mephisto stealing stand blood, or does the word need to be changed to leave?
- Ok. — Hunter Kahn _(c) 14:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - You said Ok, but it still is the same? CTJF83 chat 20:00, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - My mistake! Fixed. It should just be "leave". — Hunter Kahn _(c) 22:21, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
source for the original title? I guess it looks like you guys are putting one reference at the end of each paragraph for the whole thing? Is this standard, I've never seen it.
- That's right, if it pertains to all the information in that paragraph, I use one citation at the end of the paragraph to encompass it all. I'm pretty sure this is correct according to WP:FOOTNOTE ("Material may be referenced mid-sentence or at the end of a sentence or paragraph, as needed for clarity."), and this is how I've handled citations in pretty much all of my GAs and FAs and it's worked out fine. That's what I did in this case. However, I found a fairly new book source with this info, so I added that citation instead. — Hunter Kahn _(c) 14:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I know I personally have a problem doing this, but can you try and copyedit the 2nd paragraph of the cultural references section, so it reads less like a list of facts in paragraph form, and flows better. The 1st paragraph flows together very nicely
- I took a crack at this. — Hunter Kahn _(c) 14:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Reference 4, can you try and find a different source, preferably from Comedy Central. If Comedy Central doesn't have anything, ref 5 will be sufficient
- I replaced it with a newspaper article, which is probably a better independent, secondary source. — Hunter Kahn _(c) 14:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you see if you can use Google News (or any other source) and try and find the ratings for the episode, ie. how many people viewed it.
  - Believe me, I've looked all over Lexis Nexis and have not been successful. In the season one, ratings info is hit or miss; in bringing these articles up to FA and GA, I've found some for some episodes and found nada for others. :( — Hunter Kahn _(c) 14:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CTJF83 chat 09:46, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Just so you know, I added just a tiny bit new info, and I moved the Home Release section below Reception, which is based on feedback we've gotten at previous GANs. Sorry I forgot to do this before. You can see my changes here. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn _(c) 14:59, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks good, passing the GA! CTJF83 chat 06:18, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on An Elephant Makes Love to a Pig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080404233334/http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=1673 to http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/faq/archives.php?id=1673

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:56, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]