Talk:André-Joseph Léonard

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the André-Joseph Léonard article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Catholicism Low‑importance

André-Joseph Léonard is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Neutral point of view

Large sections of this article now read more like a party indictment of Leonard than an objective biography, full of argumentative speculation. See for example the paragraph under "Initial Reception" - "Did Rome anticipate these negative reactions? They must have foreseen them, if they paid attention to the terna, the list of three names of possible successors Karl-Josef Rauber, the papal nuncio, put together in 2008, after the usual consultations of Belgian church and state leaders, and sent to Rome. They must certainly have foreseen them when Léonard’s name was not on the second terna, which Rauber put together after the first had been rejected by Rome." If such speculation is to be included, it needs to be quoted in a primary source, and attributed. Remember: "The tone of Wikipedia articles should be impartial, neither endorsing nor rejecting a particular point of view." Likewise, I question the inclusion of the entire "Temperament" section, something I can hardly recall being done in other well moderated biographies of this sort in Wiki. Alexander1926 (talk) 14:35, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Be aware that this page needs to be protected from vandals somehow. I am not neutral and will refrain from editing the page in question since the wiki page on vandalism just confused me when I tried to figure out how to flag the page for it.Pär Larsson 03:26, 23 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Parl2001 (talk • contribs)

Primate of Belgium section

A half-sentence with no end leads me to believe that this section was edited by someone in haste, whether warranted or not I do not know. Being an inexperienced editor and not neutral I don't see it as my place to revert or try to figure out what should or shouldn't be in that section. Help, please? Pär Larsson (talk) 04:23, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on André-Joseph Léonard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on André-Joseph Léonard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.rcfnamur.be/default.asp?X=68B9A868F3767561040B0406001076746204090704071676706104080405051374797808040603137F730D040103EF
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120808201435/http://press.catholica.va/news_services/bulletin/news/26652.php?index=26652&lang=en to http://press.catholica.va/news_services/bulletin/news/26652.php?index=26652&lang=en
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://blogs.telemoustique.be/blogs/2007/04/le_debat_continue_voici_les_ex.asp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://diocesedenamur.be/default.asp?X=8FB1E9D505667E78626275616D0B0B06016C

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]