Talk:Archduchess Louise of Austria

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 21:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Luise of Tuscany was never queen-consort. Therefore Wikipedia rule for consorts does not apply here, request move to revert to her maiden form. Gryffindor 16:34, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Voting[edit]

Discussion[edit]

Who has written that? If you do not have full command of the English language, do not try to use it in writing!

--Alexvonf 9 July 2005 14:03 (UTC)

Considering she was never queen of Saxony (divorced), this article needs to be renamed, doesn't it? Archduchess Luise, Princess of Tuscany for example? or is it Archduchess Luise of Austria, Princess of Tuscany? Gryffindor 17:52, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Gryffindor, IMO, Archduchess Luise, Princess of Tuscany would be the better title. I don't think that there would be too much of a disturbance to move it, but if you think so, put up a notice on WP:RM and I guess we would find out. Prsgoddess187 19:15, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree as well. I believe that Archduchess Luise, Princess of Tuscany is the best choice. Austria-Tuscany should be avoided if proposed... In fact, a lot of the hyphenated royals ought to be evaluated (eg, Bourbon-Parma, Bourbon-Two Sicilies, etc). Charles 19:45, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

brother[edit]

this article mentions a brother, but does not say which one. Tinynanorobots (talk) 17:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]