Talk:Barry Joule
Appearance
A fact from Barry Joule appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 September 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 08:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that due to a left/right mix-up, Barry Joule destroyed the wrong Francis Bacon painting, which would now be worth around £35 million? Source: "The late artist’s friend received a furious 4am phone call after burning the wrong portrait in a mix-up over right and left. When Francis Bacon asked a friend to destroy one of two paintings in his studio, he said it was the “one on the left”. Bacon’s idea of left turned out to be as distinctive as his art, resulting in a disastrous mistake — the destruction of a painting that would now be worth about £35m. The artist’s friend was Barry Joule" ([1])
- Reviewed: not yet done
Created by Edwardx (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 20:05, 16 August 2021 (UTC).
- General eligibility:
- New enough: - n
- Long enough:
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: - Not done
Overall: @Edwardx and Philafrenzy: Article is one day late—I'll let it slide. Hilarious and interesting hook—plus, the one about him being the model in those paintings where he wore cricket pads would also make an excellent hook if only it were under 200 characters. Holding approval awaiting a QPQ. Nicely done :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 06:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Edwardx: you don't appear to have disappeared off of Wikipedia—do you have a QPQ? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 08:05, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- any chance someone could donate a QPQ? @Philafrenzy? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 02:21, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: Donating Template:Did you know nominations/Lucy Smith Millikin as a QPQ. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Narutelovehinata5: thanks so much! I'll pass the nomination. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 06:51, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: oops theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 06:51, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: Donating Template:Did you know nominations/Lucy Smith Millikin as a QPQ. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- any chance someone could donate a QPQ? @Philafrenzy? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 02:21, 30 August 2021 (UTC)