Talk:Bart Bok

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

A fact from Bart Bok appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 September 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Bart Bok and his wife Priscilla, who were both astronomers, worked together so closely that it was "difficult and pointless to separate his achievements from hers"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bart Bok.

Wikipedia

Cleanup/expansion

I have taken a User copy of this article, which I will try to clean up and expand, especially focusing on providing references. If any editor has material which you think would be helpful, or has feelings about what is / is not appropriate to include, then please comment here so we can discuss it. --Gronk Oz (talk) 03:51, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done The new version is significantly expanded, and I hope it meets with your approval. --Gronk Oz (talk) 11:04, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Work?

It is not mentioned in the article what his main area of work was; an image briefly mentions that he studied dark nebulae. Maybe someone can go into more detail in his biography? David H. Levy told me last year that he wrote Bok's biography, but I have not read it; maybe someone here did? CielProfond (talk) 00:27, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for calling attention to a serious omission. I've inserted the basic information; perhaps it can be expanded upon later. Hertz1888 (talk) 04:20, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was in the process of expanding the article when this discussion came up: hopefully the new version will help to address some of the issues. --Gronk Oz (talk) 11:02, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well done

First DYK I've read in a long time that didn't basic typos or brow-furrowing phrasing. Thank you! Shenme (talk) 00:27, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure, Shenme - I'm glad you approve! --Gronk Oz (talk) 08:56, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review/ suggested improvements

In response to a question at the Teahouse, Cullen328 offered the following comments:

I took a quick look at Bart Bok and agree that it is better than start class. It is a developed, informative article about a fascinating person and his accomplished wife. On the other hand, it has some problems. Some content in the lead is duplicated word for word in the body. The lead is supposed to summarize the body, not incorporate sentences word for word. Also, there is an excessively long quotation by Bok. My guideline is that a two sentence quote is fine, a three sentence quote is OK but deserves a second look, and a four sentence quote is pushing the limits. So, I suggest that you copy edit that article and then upgrade its rating. Cullen328 04:35, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bart Bok. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.physicstoday.org/resource/1/phtoad/v36/i12/p73_s1?bypassSSO=1
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140721002547/http://www.rasc.ca/content/asteroid-1983 to http://www.rasc.ca/content/asteroid-1983

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]