Talk:Battle of Meretun

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Meretun article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms Low‑importance

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Norse history and culture Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the North Germanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / Nordic / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dorset Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dorset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Dorset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Dorset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.DorsetWikipedia:WikiProject DorsetTemplate:WikiProject DorsetDorset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hampshire Low‑importance

	Hampshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiltshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 08:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger from Battle of Merton

I found a number of references to the Battle of Marton in wikipedia entries (eg. Danelaw, Battle of Basing) that were not linked to a battle page. I created this stub and in referencing it discovered the Battle of Merton entry. The content of both needs to be merged as they refer to the same battle - I propose the merge from Merton to Marton - both may be equally valid.Metabaronic (talk) 11:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Clearly the same battle. Revcasy (talk) 12:23, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, go for it. Just make sure you get all the redirects together. Sadads (talk) 11:20, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now merged. Metabaronic (talk) 20:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further possible location

Another possible location for this Battle was Merdon Castle (originally an iron age hill fort) now part of the parish of Hursley, Winchester, Hampshire. This would make sense as this is very close to Winchester, which in turn is near to Basing now Basingstoke

This is cited as the location in British History Online - A History of the County of Hampshire: Volume 3

With footnote 6 in the above reference adding...

Milner in his Hist. of Winchester identifies it thus because of the evident nearness of the scene to Winchester, whereas Merton in Surrey, with which other writers (Lingard, Hist. of England, i, 164, &c.) have identified Merantune, would have been too far from the king's capital for his military forces to reach the scene of the murder before Cynheard could withdraw (Hist. of Winchester, 111). Woodward unhesitatingly accepted Milner's opinion (Hist. of Hants, i, 319). One other point that seems to sweep away many of the objections made by Marsh in his Mem. of the Parish of Hursley is that the spelling 'Merantune' is found in one version of the chronicle in the description of a battle which he himself gives as taking place at Merdon; Angl.-Sax. Chron. (Rolls Ser.), i, 140; Cott. Tib. A. iv. Zekizeki (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see no objection to adding the possible Hampshire site. The Victoria County History is always a good reference, even with such early volumes. Moonraker (talk) 19:10, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Marton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060915081931/http://omega.cohums.ohio-state.edu/mailing_lists/CLA-L/2000/06/0136.php to http://omega.cohums.ohio-state.edu/mailing_lists/CLA-L/2000/06/0136.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:46, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Marton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050413092553/http://pages.britishlibrary.net/rhavy/heugont.html to http://pages.britishlibrary.net/rhavy/heugont.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 November 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 07:23, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Marton → Battle of Meretun – The spelling Marton does not seem to be used any longer in academic sources. The only one I can find is over a century old, the 1918 Beaven article referenced in the Wiki article. The most common spelling is Meretun, used in the DNB article on Æthelred, Keynes and Lapidge's edition of Asser p. 243, Richard Abels' biography of Alfred the Great p. 135, Alfred Smyth's biography of Alfred p. 34, Barbara Yorke's Wessex in the Middle Ages p. 109 and Dorothy Whitelock's Anglo-Saxon Chronicle p. 47. The most common alternative is Merton, used by Ann Williams in the Biographical Dictionary of Dark Age Britain, p. 27 and Michael Swanton's Anglo-Saxon Chronicles p. 70. Dudley Miles (talk) 18:15, 27 November 2019 (UTC)—Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 10:23, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I remember noticing the same thing when researching a related article.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 00:11, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thekiddio666 (talk) 06:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I'm curious as to why the spelling Meretum is used in the article and it would seem that someone copied the opening from this page. There is no certainty at all about Marton as the location and Dudley's sources carry considerable weight. No Great Shaker (talk) 06:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.