Talk:Be the One (Dua Lipa song)
![]() | Be the One (Dua Lipa song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Be the One (Dua Lipa song) is part of the Dua Lipa (album) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Be the One (Dua Lipa song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Be the One (Dua Lipa song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161228174302/http://oe3.orf.at/charts/stories/2749413/ to http://oe3.orf.at/charts/stories/2749413/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Be the One (Dua Lipa song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160603133217/http://portuguesecharts.com/archive.asp?todo=show&woche=17&jahr=2016&sparte=s to http://portuguesecharts.com/archive.asp?todo=show&woche=17&jahr=2016&sparte=s
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:21, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Be the One (Dua Lipa song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kyle Peake (talk · contribs) 15:49, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Like last time I reviewed one of your articles, I will do this in stages of sorts since it is very large. --Kyle Peake (talk) 15:49, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Wow Kyle Peake, thanks so much for reviewing another one of my articles so soon. I'll be sure to look at another of yours as soon as I can. LOVI33 16:03, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- LOVI33 My pleasure and that would be great if you did, I'm not meaning to be trading reviews or anything since some may think that comes across as bias but it's not like we're going around asking each other to review things constantly so nah. --Kyle Peake (talk) 16:31, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
[edit]- Cover art needs alt text parameter added
- Remove hlist and switch order to Digital download followed by CD, since the digital release came first
- "from her self-titled debut studio album" → "from her eponymous debut studio album"
- "included as the album's fourth track" remove since this is not notable and is unsourced
- "with the latter two handling the production and vocal production respectively" → "with the second and third of the three handling production and vocal production, respectively"
- "was released through the singer's independent record label, Dua Lipa Limited, as the second single from the album and" → "was released for digital download through Dua Lipa Limited as the second single from the album on October 30, 2015, and"
- "where she didn't have" → "on which she did not have"
- "Its lyrics see Lipa begging for her muse" → "The lyrics see Lipa begging for her partner"
- "as she could "be the one."" → "of romantic redemption"
- "music critics with many commenting on the song's production" → "music critics, with many praising the production"
- "Upon its release, it did not chart," → "Upon release, the song failed to chart;"
- "by radio stations in Germany" → "by German radio stations"
- "In 2017, the song entered the UK Singles Chart, eventually peaking at number nine," → "In 2017, the song peaked at number nine on the UK Singles Chart,"
- Remove "at the time" since becoming does not necessarily indicate it remained at that rank forever
- "The song was sent to American contemporary hit radio by" → "On 21 March 2017, the song was sent to US contemporary hit radio by"
- "from Dua Lipa where it" → "from Dua Lipa, where it"
- "the most added song as well as becoming Lipa's second" → "the most added song of the week and Lipa's second US"
- "also entered the top ten in nine" → "further entered the top 10 of nine" per MOS:NUM
- Wikilink music video to itself
- "for "Be the One" accompanied the song's release and was" → "for "Be the One", which accompanied the song's release, was"
- "After becoming a sleeper hit, a second music video" → "After the song became a sleeper hit, a second music video"
- "and stars Ansel Elgort as Lipa's" → "and features Ansel Elgort as Lipa's"
- "in a partnership" → "in a collaboration"
- "and Lexus where a" → "and Lexus, with it including"
- "covered in LEDs appears" → "covered in LEDs appearing" with the appropriate target
- "Lipa promoted the single with many live performances, including" → "Lipa promoted the song with numerous live performances, including ones for"
- "Good Morning America and" → "Good Morning America, and"
Done
Background and composition
[edit]- Target chorus to Refrain on the audio sample text
- Not everything written out there is backed up the ref; add the other appropriate ones too here
- Re-written to fit ref
- "Digital Farm Animals, and Jack Tarrant and given to Lipa by the former two" → "Digital Farm Animals and Jack Tarrant, being given to Lipa by the former of the three" since I don't think comma is needed for three writers
- "of two songs on" → "of the two songs on"
- "At first, she was reluctant" → "Initially, she was reluctant"
- "although, she formed" → "though Lipa ultimately formed"
- "to get over it" → "to get over the fact"
- "than songs she has" → "than that to ones she has"
- "reminisces about when she" → "reminisces about having"
- "in an interview" → "during an interview"
- Add release year of "New Love" in brackets
- "It was released on 30 October 2015" → "The song was released for digital download as a single on 30 October 2015" with the targets
- "independent record label, Dua Lipa Limited" → "independent record label Dua Lipa Limited"
- "she wasn't very excited" → "she lacked excitement"
- Target interpolated to Interpolation (popular music)
- Introduce who Ellie Goulding is
- Mention the chorus somewhere in the comp para and make sure to target to Refrain
- Left it out of audio sample because it wasn't explicit. Couldn't find any reliable explicit sources. LOVI33 22:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- "with gospel and" → "which includes gospel and"
- "The song's intro follows a" → "The intro follows a"
- "F–E♭–E♭maj7–F–Fsus4 while the rest" → "F–E♭–E♭maj7–F–Fsus4, while the rest" maybe I am not looking properly, but where is this on the source?
- Source, the archived version probably doesn't show it but if you look at chords in the sample it shows this. Parts have a watermark but it disappears if you buy it. LOVI33 22:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- "has a airy production," → "has an airy production,"
- Target handclaps to Clapping
- "spanning from" → "spanning a range of"
- "by Lipa as about" → "by Lipa as being about"
- "after a falling out" → "after a falling out with her boyfriend"
Done, I saw your Streaming edits, I am unsure if streaming should be included since this song was released in 2015. If I am wrong just re-add it. LOVI33 22:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Critical reception
[edit]- "received generally favourable reviews" → "was met with generally favourable reviews"
- "called "Be the One" a standout on Dua Lipa comparing" → "called the song a standout on Dua Lipa and compared"
- "as well as calling it" → "while she also called the song"
- "In a separate The Line of Best Fit review," → "In a separate review for the same magazine,"
- "called it a" → "labelled it a"
- Target pop to Pop music
- "praised its production as well as" → "praising the production and also"
- "Writing for DIY, Jamie Milton called the song" → "For DIY, Jamie Milton described the song as"
- Target club to Electronic dance music
- "potential" as well as comparing" → "potential," as well as comparing"
- "wistfulness" as well as calling it" → "wistfulness," while he also viewed it as"
- "than Lipa's previous release "New Love"" → "than Lipa's "New Love"" since we have already introduced
- "Writing for The Fader, Jeff Ihaza called" → "For The Fader, Jeff Ihaza branded"
- "Writing for Clash, Alex Green" → "In a review for Clash, Alex Green"
- Add release year of "Hotter than Hell" in brackets
- "called its chorus" → "labelled its chorus"
- "categorized the chorus as" → "categorizing the chorus as"
- "sophisticated" as well as comparing it" → "sophisticated," as well as comparing the song"
- Remove target on Nylon
- "called the song "perfect club music" as well as" → "described the song as "perfect club music," while also"
- "Writing for Vice, Alexandra Hayward called it" → "For Vice, Alexandra Hayward branded the song"
- "in Lipa's vocals" → "of Lipa's vocals"
- Target The Singles Jukebox to Stylus Magazine
- "its production but criticized its meaning, writing it doesn't" → "the production but criticized its meaning, writing that the song does not"
- "vocals calling them" → "vocals for being"
- "and comparing it to" → "and comparing the song to the music of"
Done
Commercial performance
[edit]- "did not chart and received" → "failed to chart and received"
- Wikilink airplay to itself
- "across Europe" → "across the rest of Europe"
- "later peaked at number 11" → "ultimately peaked at number 11"
- "it entered the UK Singles Chart for the first time at number 54" → "the song entered the UK Singles Chart at number 54"
- Add citation to back up the fourth entry statement
- "It later peaked at number 9 on the chart" → "It later peaked at number nine on the chart issue"
- "It was overtaken by..." remove this, since "becoming" does not instate it remained at that rank forever and this is not focused on the article
- "The song departed the chart in July 2017" replace with "The song lasted for (however many weeks) on the chart" and use chart history as a source
- "by the British Phonographic Industry" → "by the British Phonographic Industry (BPI) for sales of 200,000 units in the United Kingdom"
- "The song additionally peaked inside the top 10 of 7 other European territories" → "In Europe, the song further peaked in the top 10 of..." then name the seven countries separately, since you can't cram that many refs at the end of the sentence
- "peaking at number 6 and 20 respectively in Australia and New Zealand" → "peaking at number 6 and 20 in Australia and New Zealand, respectively"
- "before its official radio impact on 21 March 2017" → "before it officially impacted radio on 21 March of that year"
- "After its official American radio release, it" → "After the official US radio release, the track"
- "the most added song," → "the most added song of the week,"
- "and peaked atop the" → "and reached the summit of the"
Done
Music videos
[edit]- ""Be the One" videos." → "music videos for "Be the One"" on the img main text, with the wikilink
- ""Be the One" was accompanied by two music videos." → "Two accompanying music videos were released." with the wikilink
- "The first video was directed by" → "The first was directed by"
- "who also directed Lipa's video" → "who was also director of the video"
- "It premiered through" → "The visual premiered through"
- Remove target on Nylon
- "In The Fader, Jeff Ihaza wrote "the [video] skips" → "Ihaza wrote the music video "skips"
- "video "[compliments]" the song" → "video compliments the song" since it is an encyclopedic word
- "and Vevo and features a" → "and Vevo, and features a"
- "41,999 LEDs that generates" → "41,999 LEDs, which generates"
- "It was made after Lipa saw fans" → "It was created after Lipa noticed fans"
- "motel room. Lipa then storms out with Elgort following" → "motel room, followed by Lipa storming out while Elgort follows"
- "empty motorway where flashback scenes" → "empty motorway, where flashback scenes"
- [29] does not offer any mention of the Lexus IS
- Removed.
- The following sentence has no citation(s) at the end of it
- Replaced
- "Writing for V, William Defebaugh called the video "futuristic" and" → "For V, William Defebaugh called the music video "futuristic," while"
- "called it "other-worldly"." → "described it as "other-worldly.""
Done
Live performances
[edit]- "at the 2016 Eurosonic festival" → "at the Eurosonic festival for that year"
- "set lists of Lipa's Hotter Than Hell tour and Self-Titled tour" → "set lists of both Lipa's Hotter Than Hell Tour and The Self-Titled Tour"
- "performed the song at" → "performed the song for"
- "at the 2017 Brits for" → "at the Brit Awards for" with the target
- "EBBA awards and the" → "EBBA Awards, and the" with the target
- "Lipa performed the song at" → "Lipa performed the song during"
- "That year in the United States," → "That same year, in the US,"
- "Jimmy Kimmel Live! and Good Morning America" → "Jimmy Kimmel Live!, and Good Morning America"
- "The song a part of Lipa's setlists" → "The song was part of Lipa's setlists"
- "Big Weekend, Bonnaroo and 2018s Tomorrowland" → "Big Weekend as well as Bonnaroo, and 2018s Tomorrowland"
Done
Track listing
[edit]- Are you sure the col is required here?
- Removed
Credits and personnel
[edit]- Don't think the sub-sections are required; sub-headings are better like on the recently passed GA "No Mistakes"
- Any specific order for the personnel?
- This is the order on the liner notes
- Use
{{spaced ndash}}
so there is the right space between credits and personnel
Done
Charts
[edit]Weekly charts
[edit]- See MOS:TABLECAPTION; maybe something like: Weekly chart performance for "Be the One"
- Remove the first Czech chart since that is a radio one so isn't notable
- Ditto for the first Slovakia chart
Not done Both are listed in Template:Single chart, I don't know if that makes if notable but just tell me if I'm wrong.
Done
Year-end charts
[edit]- See MOS:TABLECAPTION; make sure you give separate ones for the two years, though
- Remove wikilink on SloTop50
Done
Certifications
[edit]- See MOS:TABLECAPTION; probably: Certifications and sales for "Be the One"
Done
Release history
[edit]- Ditto, but maybe Release dates and formats for "Be the One"
- Cite streaming with the digital download releases, since that is what iTunes indicates
- Target Warner Bros. to Warner Records
Done
See also
[edit]- Good
References
[edit]- Nice archiving here
- Copyvio score looks great at 13.0%!
- Target The Singles Jukebox to Stylus Magazine on ref 1
- Target Warner Bros. Records to Warner Records on ref 2
- Fix MOS:QWQ issues with refs 4 and 64
- Ref 7 should cite multiple iTunes Stores to verify that the release was indeed various; also; iTunes Store should be cited as publisher instead
- Cite Entertainment Tonight Canada for ref 9 instead
- Remove wikilink on NME for ref 10
- Fame Magazine → FMagazine on ref 13
- Ref 24 should have de la Rosa, Manzanares laid out as Rosa, Manzanares de la instead
- Wikilink YouTube on ref 48
- Change ref 49 to removing Lexus and citing MultiVu as publisher with the target to PR Newswire
- Cite CelebMix as publisher instead for ref 54
- Cite Red Bull as publisher instead for ref 66
- MOS:CAPS issues appear to be with ref 67, but is that how it is stylized though? If yes, then keep.
- iTunes Store (Austria) → iTunes Store (AT) on ref 70
- iTunes Store (Germany) → iTunes Store (DE) on ref 71
- iTunes Store (Switzerland) → iTunes Store (CH) on ref 72
- iTunes Store (UK) → iTunes Store (GB) on ref 73 and cite numerous countries to verify the release was various
- Cite Amazon as publisher instead for ref 74 and change (Germany) to (DE)
- Cite Monitor Latino as publisher instead for ref 75
- Remove targets on Billboard for refs 84 and 90
- Cite Kiss FM as publisher instead for ref 95
- slotop50.si → SloTop50 on ref 99 with the wikilink and remove the chart name from the URL title
- Cite Australian Recording Industry Association as publisher instead for ref 104
- Cite austriancharts.at as publisher instead for ref 105
- Cite Ultratop as publisher instead for ref 106 with the wikilink
- Cite Offizielle Deutsche Charts as publisher instead for ref 107 and target to GfK Entertainment charts
- Cite MAHASZ as publisher instead for ref 108 and target to Association of Hungarian Record Companies, while remove the publisher from title
- Fix MOS:CAPS issues with ref 109, also remove MAHASZ from the title while citing it as publisher instead but no target
- Fix MOS:QWQ issues with ref 110 and cite Federazione Industria Musicale Italiana as publisher instead
- Cite Dutch Top 40 as publisher instead for ref 111 with the wikilink
- Cite dutchcharts.nl as publisher instead for ref 112
- Cite Polish Society of the Phonographic Industry as publisher instead for ref 113
- Remove SloTop50 from the title of ref 114 and cite it as publisher instead, but remove the wikilink
- Cite swisscharts.com as publisher instead for ref 115
- Cite Radio Date instead for refs 128 and 129, as publisher
- Retitle ref 130 to Radio 1 – Playlist and cite BBC as publisher instead with no wikilink
Done
Final comments and verdict
[edit]On hold until the issues are fixed; one thing I often noticed was not citing publishers properly. --Kyle Peake (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks again for reviewing this article Kyle Peake! I have addressed all the issues. Is there anything else I can do? LOVI33 15:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- LOVI33 Great job, the article is looking good right now; I just have a statement about the chart query. I don't believe the radio charts are notable since you have the main singles charts for Czech Republic and Slovakia, so why include those too? --Kyle Peake (talk) 18:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Okay Kyle Peake, I have removed them. LOVI33 18:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- ✓ Pass on this now! --Kyle Peake (talk) 18:47, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Okay Kyle Peake, I have removed them. LOVI33 18:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- LOVI33 Great job, the article is looking good right now; I just have a statement about the chart query. I don't believe the radio charts are notable since you have the main singles charts for Czech Republic and Slovakia, so why include those too? --Kyle Peake (talk) 18:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks again for reviewing this article Kyle Peake! I have addressed all the issues. Is there anything else I can do? LOVI33 15:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Music good articles
- GA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics Dua Lipa (album) good content
- Low-importance Featured topics articles
- GA-Class song articles
- GA-Class Dua Lipa articles
- Mid-importance Dua Lipa articles
- WikiProject Dua Lipa articles
- GA-Class Pop music articles
- Low-importance Pop music articles
- Pop music articles
- GA-Class Women in music articles
- Unknown-importance Women in music articles
- WikiProject Women in Music articles
- GA-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- GA-Class Albania articles
- Low-importance Albania articles
- WikiProject Albania articles