Jump to content

Talk:Beautiful Mystery

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk23:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the 1983 pink film Beautiful Mystery was one of the earliest commercially-produced gay pornographic films in Japan? Source: Behind the Pink Curtain: The Complete History of Japanese Sex Cinema
    • ALT1: ... that the 1983 pink film Beautiful Mystery, a satire of writer and nationalist Yukio Mishima, was one of the earliest commercially-produced gay pornographic films in Japan? Source: Behind the Pink Curtain: The Complete History of Japanese Sex Cinema
    • Reviewed: WCFW
    • Comment: "Pink film" is not a generally recognized term, but I thought it sounds intriguing and suggestive enough that an inquiring reader might get its general meaning from the context of the hook.

Created by Morgan695 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • The criteria are met and no copyvio detected. The hook is also cited to gaycinema.info, which looks like a self-published source but is in fact run by the distributor, so I guess it's an acceptable primary source (though the claim borders on WP:EXCEPTIONAL—"one of" is doing heavy lifting). I don't have access to the book so I AGF. The writer has a PhD in Japanese cinema. A minor quibble is that the hook violates MOS:HYPHEN.
  • ALT2: ... that the 1983 pink film Beautiful Mystery was one of the earliest commercially produced gay pornographic films in Japan?
Mentioning Mishima makes some sense as it probably comes as a surprise to those who already have an idea of who he was (one doesn't expect him as a subject of pornographic satire, much less from 1983), but I wonder if "nationalist" is really necessary. I don't think anyone disputes that he was one, but the juxtaposition with "writer" might seem awkward or undue so one might as well do away with both. Also I believe "satire on" is better. Nardog (talk) 11:44, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Nardog: Both proposed alt hooks look good to me. Morgan695 (talk) 15:52, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]