Jump to content

Talk:Bramley apple

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why does Hampshire County Council think that the Bramley apple came from Bramley, Hampshire? http://www3.hants.gov.uk/localpages/north-east/tadley/bramley.htm Pt1234 11:56, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Probably to try to popularise the place regardless of whether it is true or not. They're wrong, though; the original 'Bramley's Seedling' tree is still alive and well in Southwell, Nottinghamshire [1]. - MPF 15:02, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


I really like a raw bramley. Edited the bias. 172.159.207.120 08:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 01:46, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I put in 2 known USA links for purchasing Bramley Apples in the USA. The reason is that Bramley are not really found in America, it's an anomaly. It has taken me literally years to find them in the USA, so please leave the links for people to find where to get them in the USA. Ruth E (talk) 07:38, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have a considerable amount of sympathy for you, but I've removed the section. I can't see how it can be justified in Wikipedia, which is an encyclopedia and not a guidebook. What I've done instead is to use one of the farms' listings as an inline citation for the fact that Bramleys are grown (in very small numbers) in the US. Loganberry (Talk) 02:16, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newspaper article

[edit]

This article from the Kent News, dated 14 May 2009, seems to copy large portions of this page verbatim. --RFBailey (talk) 04:51, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Origin

[edit]

Granted that apples from the "original" tree were called Bramley's for the first time after the events described in the origin section, nevertheless the seeds had to come from somewhere. There must have been apple trees of the same species around already. Is there any record of that? Madgenberyl (talk) 17:08, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apples don't come true from seed, whatever the tree was that produced the seed that grew up to be the original Bramley Seedling it wasn't a Bramley itself. All apple trees, whatever their variety, are the same species.MidlandLinda (talk) 13:38, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bramley apple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:20, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pollinator/Pollinizer

[edit]

Tricky to know which word to use. As the page appears to be written in British English (spelling of flavour) I changed pollinizer to pollinator, and have been reverted. Fair enough, apart from the patronising comment to read the link. I did read the link, and as we are always told to go to the publised sources, I consulted several dictionaries, the main way to decide word meanings and usage.

Most British dictionaries do not include pollinizer as a recognised word. The OED does include it, restricting its usage to N. America, and giving the meaning as being the same as pollinator, namely both a source of pollen and the vector for pollination.

So as I see it, either this page about an apple hardly grown in N. America is put into US English and uses pollinizer, or it remains in British English and uses pollinator. What is the consensus? MidlandLinda (talk) 20:24, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, UK fruit tree nurseries talk of "good pollinators", "ideal pollinators", "best pollinators", etc. That word also has the advantage of being understood in the required sense on both sides of the Atlantic and further afield. William Avery (talk) 22:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've changed it to pollinator as discussed above. Samatarou (talk) 17:13, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bramley apple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:57, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bramley apple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:08, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]