Talk:Cécile Vogt-Mugnier

Cécile Vogt-Mugnier received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cleanup

Please see Talk:Oskar Vogt for the Cleanup issues. The comments there apply to this article as well.

Article has been expanded, reorganized, and cleaned. -Iamozy (talk) 23:37, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mention of spouse in lead

I initially thought the spouses should not be named in the lead of each scientist's lead, because that seems to imply that they are notable because of their spouse. But I can also see that since they worked so closely with each other, mention of the other spouse may be too important to leave out of the lead. Any opinions? --Iamozy (talk) 15:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, since they worked so closely together, I think he should be mentioned in the lead. 1bandsaw (talk) 17:38, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cécile Vogt-Mugnier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20140507062544/http://www.unifreunde-duesseldorf.de/stiftungen/vogt-institut to http://www.unifreunde-duesseldorf.de/stiftungen/vogt-institut

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]