Jump to content

Talk:Cadet scandal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk06:27, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source:
  • Página/12 (in Spanish). Quote: "The incident that became a homosexual hunt and became famous as the cadet scandal was only known by the newspapers of the time and by elusive witnesses (...). The alleged charge of corruption of minors was a subterfuge to hide the persecution of gays. (...) it was a homosexual hunt." ("El hecho que devino cacería homosexual y pasó a la celebridad como el escándalo de los cadetes solo se conocía por los periódicos de la época y por testigos esquivos. (...) Se alegaba supuesto cargo de corrupción de menores pero era un subterfugio para esconder la persecución a los gays. (...) era una cacería homosexual")
  • Página/12 (in Spanish). Quote: "Of all the versions of the 1942 Great Raid, which actually appears to have been not one but several raids..." ("De todas las versiones de la Gran Razzia de 1942, que en realidad parece que fueron no uno sino varios allanamientos")
  • Juan José Sebreli (1997). Escritos sobre escritos, ciudades bajo ciudades, p. 311 (in Spanish). Quote: "There was a large raid of homosexuals, the first of such magnitude in the city of Buenos Aires..." ("Se hizo una gran redada de homosexuales, la primera de esa magnitud en la ciudad de Buenos Aires...")
  • Infobae (in Spanish.) Quote: "'The cadet scandal': the story of a great homosexual hunt in Argentina." ("'El escándalo de los cadetes': la historia de una gran cacería homosexual en la Argentina")

Created by Rumba Samba Mambo (talk). Self-nominated at 23:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.
Overall: Article is well written, very in-depth and well-sourced. The hook is properly cited and interesting, I'm assuming good faith on all offline and/or Spanish sources. This was obviously a historically significant and well-documented event so I feel comfortable with that. I noticed a few minor typos and corrected them, but it's a solid article besides. Earwig did not pick up any copyvio. QPQ is not needed as nominator has fewer than 5 DYK credits. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend for GA

[edit]

To the primary author of this article, @Rumba Samba Mambo: I highly recommend giving this article some tune-ups and then nominating it at WP:GA. Nice work! theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/them) 21:07, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! It will definitely be in my plans 💝 --ℜ𝔲𝔪𝔟𝔞 𝔖𝔞𝔪𝔟𝔞 𝔐𝔞𝔪𝔟𝔬 🌠 (talk) 22:39, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Cadet scandal/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 16:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I will be taking a look at this! — GhostRiver 16:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Lede

[edit]
  • Swap em dashes for commas around "also known as the Ballvé Case (Spanish: Caso Ballvé)"
Done
  • "whose content" → "the contents of which"
Done

Background

[edit]

Political and military context

[edit]
  • in the context of the Second World War, in which the country maintained its neutrality. fragment
Done
  • "and the party system"
Done
  • "Thanks to the coup" → "Under Uriburu's coup"
Done
  • "was declared the winner"
Done
  • "spin-off" → "offshoot"
Done

Gay culture in Buenos Aires

[edit]
Done
  • "name by which they were also referred to." → "a name which also came to describe its speakers."
Done
Done
  • Comma after "sought to modernize the country"
Done
Done

Ballvé Piñero's parties

[edit]
  • "eighteen years younger" → "18 years his junior"
Done
Done
  • "name which alluded to the" → "named for the"
Done
  • Swap colon for comma after "in his own words"
Done
  • "In medical experts" → "To medical experts"
Done

Investigation and arrest

[edit]
  • "him seduce other cadets" → "as he seduced other cadets"
Done
  • Delink "birthday party", "discharge", and "lawsuit" per MOS:OVERLINK
Done
  • "one hundred and twenty-one" → "121" per MOS:NUM
Done

Impact

[edit]

Society and politics

[edit]
  • "the public rumor ahd begun to spread around the general public"
Done
  • "about who the men involved were" → "the identities of the men involved"
Done
  • "a big street fighting occurred" → "a large street fight" without the WL
Done
  • "a number that parodied" → "a number parodying"
Done
  • comma for em dash after "June 4, 1943,"
Done

Ensuing gay persecution

[edit]
  • "Goodwin was apprehend the same day as his friend," → "Goodwin was apprehended the same day as his friend"
Done
  • "the age of majority until July—which was 22 years old at the time—" ((right arrow)) "the age of majority (which, at the time, was 22 years old) until July"
Done
Done
  • "but rather "being" homosexual, becoming a cause of discharge from the army." → "but rather simply "being" homosexual was now a cause for discharge."
Done

Legacy

[edit]
  • "that the scandal opened "ajar the door...""
Done
  • "he got access" → "he received access"
Done
  • "more than two hundred" → "more than 200" per MOS:NUM
Done

References

[edit]
  • Good

General comments

[edit]
  • All pictures used are public domain and relevant
  • No stability concerns in the revision history
  • Copyvio score looks good at 5.7%

Putting on hold for now to allow nominator to address comments. Feel free to ping me with questions. — GhostRiver 19:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GhostRiver, thank you for taking a look. I've made the corrections. Let me know if everything's ok! --ℜ𝔲𝔪𝔟𝔞 𝔖𝔞𝔪𝔟𝔞 𝔐𝔞𝔪𝔟𝔬 🌠 (talk) 18:31, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks great now, happy to pass! — GhostRiver 18:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! --ℜ𝔲𝔪𝔟𝔞 𝔖𝔞𝔪𝔟𝔞 𝔐𝔞𝔪𝔟𝔬 🌠 (talk) 18:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]