Talk:Chatswood railway station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chatswood railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:43, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 February 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Silikonz💬 21:49, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Chatswood railway stationChatswood station – Precedent suggests that stations served by both metro and mainline trains, use simply "station" in the title, see West Brompton station --- Tbf69 P • T 18:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). UtherSRG (talk) 20:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't disagree with the sentiment here, but is this in line with Australian station naming convention? West Brompton station is in England. I note that a number of station articles have been recently moved by OP with no discussion. 162 etc. (talk) 19:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The Sydney Metro is Australia's only Metro system, and opened 2019, so there's no genuine precedent within Australia. I've already moved Epping station, Sydney, so it would be disingenuous to suggest that as precedent. --- Tbf69 P • T 15:34, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    These name changes should be reversed, they make the meaning of the articles less clear as "station" can mean many things. It is standard in Australia to use the term "railway station", and a metro is still a railway, so these are railway stations. Removing the term railway from some Sydney railway stations and not others just because of the technology of the station is unnecessary and confusing, particularly where they still serve Sydney Trains. Gracchus250 (talk) 21:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Australia and WikiProject Trains have been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 20:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, not all countries have the same naming convention for railway stations. West Brompton station is covered by the United Kingdom station namimg convention, that does not apply to Australia. A technical request has reverted 12 similar moves that were made without discussion in the last few days. Jeistyphade (talk) 02:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose - all of the Australian railway stations are named the same way except for a small couple of exceptions (usually those labelled "X Interchange"). There is no consensus to make a broader change and this should not be changed without that broader consensus. Deus et lex (talk) 23:59, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.