Talk:Chromatica

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chromatica article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Chromatica has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 22, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed
March 23, 2021	Peer review	Reviewed

Current status: Good article

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

May 24 to 30, 2020 (20th)

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Lady Gaga High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lady Gaga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lady Gaga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lady GagaWikipedia:WikiProject Lady GagaTemplate:WikiProject Lady GagaLady Gaga articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Music / 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Music portal This article is supported by WikiProject American music.
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Dawn of Chromatica[edit]

I was in the process of creating Dawn of Chromatica but the page was redirected. Thoughts on forking? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It needs to have its own article, I mean, her last two remix albums have. GagaNutella^talk 16:28, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: See Dawn of Chromatica: The Remix Album -16:58, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Year-end lists[edit]

Hi, per this consensus, best-of lists should be reduced to 10 publications. Since there are some members active in the WikiProject Lady Gaga, or this is a good article, I would like to post here if any of you guys are able to trimm the section. Regards, --Apoxyomenus (talk) 21:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Apoxyomenus: Done. --Sricsi (talk) 19:24, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Track listing - Love Me Right[edit]

Pinging Danionek, Sricsi and Kirtap92, including you Kirtap cause you've chimed in as well but weren't involved in the original back and forth. The three of you should no better than edit warring over something so trivial. Danionek, the minute your change was reverted you should have taken it to the talkpage rather than editing back and forth and reverting the article continuously. Overall the change isn't that big a deal and to be honest if two people said it wasn't clear I'd go with the version that does become clear for everyone. Either way, discuss not revert per WP:BRD. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 19:16, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lil-unique1: I really have to admit that I was wondering whether to write to Sricsi about this and perhaps explain it to him. I gave it up just before posting it, and maybe it was actually a mistake (and also writing the truth, I didn't know it was already my 3rd edit related to this thing). The reason was simply we shorten these track listings as much as possible in many other articles. Following this logic, someone else might not understand that the Target and international CD deluxe edition includes the 1st 16 tracks (from the standard version), not to mention the following more expanded versions. In these cases, you need to look at the track listing(s) literally above. Yes, it's very trivial so I'm not going to argue with the others, but as I mentioned, we do it with many other articles about albums, so I'm just curious why there's such a problem with this article.
Danionek (talk) 19:56, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The current structure with "Love Me Right" present in the target edition section looks correct to me and I agree with Sricsi's edits and reasoning on this. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 11:36, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]