This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
I agree that the site merits inclusion in WP. In the interests of clarity, I've made a few syntactical changes, which I hope you won't find obnoxious. I have also corrected some punctuation. Macphysto (talk) 07:40, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Though short, this is a great article; thanks for creating it! Shreevatsa (talk) 14:08, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 02:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Support as even the website itself is inconsistent in the use of lowercase. There is significant use of Complete Review in RS like NY Times, Time Magazine, and most of the other sources listed in the article to justify a claim for WP:COMMONNAME. However, I think the lead should remain "complete review is a literary website...", or at the very least state that it is "(stylized as complete review)" —አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 09:26, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.