Talk:Day of Reconciliation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject South Africa / PSP SA (Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Wikipedia Primary School project.

Expansion on the history of the Holiday[edit]

I see no reason why expansion to the history of the holiday, as long as it is well sourced and NPOV, shouldn't be accepted as it in fact has been reverted. Describing the history of the holiday isn't POV in and of itself; see Battle of Blood River, etc. Therefore I am now going to change it back to the version which that other editor had set it to, the version with expanded history. Invmog (talk) 19:51, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

I reverted it to that edit but I also restored the pro-ANC content and then I went back and put in more links and I think if we can more more reliable external links and lots of references then we should be good to go. Invmog (talk) 19:57, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

This article needs serious work because I just found a site where much of it has been copied from. I'll work in it some. Invmog (talk) 20:49, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

I think it's a lot better now. Invmog (talk) 22:40, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

No, it was not better. If you want to expand on the history of Day of the Vow, there's a long and detailed page about that already. (And it's not "pro-ANC" content either.) Zaian (talk) 18:52, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Yup, you're right; thanks! Invmog (talk) 01:35, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Generalization of the term "Afrikaner"[edit]

"Afrikaner" is a weak term in the sense of this article. The term itself was applied to the white peoples of South Africa by the British during the colonial days and is a generalization that includes three groups: the indigenous Boer people, the Cape Dutch Settlers, and the white British settlers. For the sake of precision I've changed "Afrikaner" to "Boer", since it was distinctly the Boer people that had fled the colonial life and came into conflict with the Zulus during their migration away from the British Empire (known as the Great Trek).Alutard (talk) 23:17, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

I agree with your edit. It was us, the Boers. Invmog (talk) 22:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Would it not be more correct to use the term "Voortrekkers (Dutch:pioneers)" as the Dutch-speakers who took the vow had not yet settled to do any farming. Martinvl (talk) 08:44, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Primary School invitation[edit]

Hi everybody. On behalf of the teams behind the Wikipedia Primary School research project, I would like to announce that this article was selected a while ago to be reviewed by an external expert. We'd now like to ask interested editors to join our efforts and improve the article before August 31, 2015 (any timezone) as they see fit; a revision will be then sent to the designated expert for review. Any notes and remarks written by the external expert will be made available on this page under a CC-BY-SA license as soon as possible, so that you can read them, discuss them and then decide if and how to use them. Please sign up here to let us know you're collaborating. Thanks a lot for your support! --Elitre (WPS) (talk) 06:10, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Review within the Wikipedia Primary School project[edit]

Lowry Day of Reconciliation.pdf

Hi all. As anticipated, some weeks ago Dr.Stephen Lowry agreed to review this article within the scope of the project linked above. You can find her notes in the PDF I just uploaded to Commons. We'd like to thank Dr. Lowry for his work and for his helpful notes. We invite everybody to feel free to reuse the review to improve the article and/or to comment it here. Best, Anthere (talk) 15:03, 6 October 2015 (UTC)