Jump to content

Talk:Devaneya Pavanar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is it really encyclopedic to say his descendants live in penury?

[edit]

Yes, it has a source attached to it, but is it any of our business? Does it add to our knowledge of Devaneya Pavanar (which is ostensibly the purpose of this article)? It reads more like gossip than anything else, and mean-spirited gossip at that. Tigercompanion25 (talk) 15:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And it's been fixed. Thank you, prompt and attentive fellow Wikipedians. Tigercompanion25 (talk) 19:34, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Devaneya Pavanar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know why so many people are interested in this 'pseudo' scientist and why so much importance is given to his absurd theories. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.141.9.38 (talk) 12:33, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]