Talk:Doom 64

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (13 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

POV

The claims that the game is plagued with problems is definitely POV. The claims that there are items and enemies that partially dissapear is bogus and I've never seen it happening playing the game. I'm not sure what they're saying when they talk about being trapped by an enemy where most weapons won't free you - if this is a problem, it was also an issue in the other Doom games.

I also found "jumping" to be easy to pull off, and only occassionally difficult when it came to discovering secret areas. This page reads like a negative review for Doom 64.

Cleanup

Article isn't very well written and contains POV. Added cleanup tag. Some guy 04:20, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've very roughly incorporated most the trivia section into the article. 69.213.245.231 (talk) 06:51, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Innaccuracies

Also, it isn't entirely accurate: The Cacodemon still had 1 eye and intrest in the Doom community had massively increased after the release of the Doom 64 TC. -TheDarkArchon 18:09, 6 November 2005

Unclear

FTA:

gameplay elements were altered to increase the sense of fear evoked in the player, making Hell a much more frightening place.

Exactly what is this supposed to mean? It reads like advertising copy. — Haeleth Talk 15:32, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Storyline Incorrect?

How strange. The storyline is seemingly all wrong for this game. In it, the heroic space marine encounters the monsters for the very first time. When I am able to, I will replay the first level in order to get a better understanding of the storyline. I hope I am not confusing this game with the equally entertaning DOOM for the SNES.

Lots42 17:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. It turns out that I was completely wrong about the storyline for the N64 Doom.Lots42 17:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Multiplayer

Many of the other articles explain the differences between the Doom port and the original version. This article points out that there are new enemies, and old ones are left out, but it doesn't mention nor explain why there is no multi player, especially on a system that can support up to 4 controllers. I think it would add a lot to the article if someone could write it in and source it, but I couldn't find a source. 68.253.55.39 00:26, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From what I've read (though I can no longer recall the source) the reason for lack of multiplayer is because there wasn't enough memory space to fit that content in the cartridge. This was also cited as the reason for dropping some of the original enemies. If you notice, nearly all of the "new" enemies are simply palette-shifted versions of otherwise identical sprites in order to use very little memory. In addition, it's interesting to note that nearly all of the game textures were done in grayscale (also to save memory space) and the game relies entirely on it's in-engine lighting effects for colour. 99.254.75.17 (talk) 03:20, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Too Much

Too much self-confessed quoting from the Doom 64 manual. Lots42 10:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My changes

There was a bit about some fandom community remaking Doom and how cool their efforts were. There was also original research about how, paraphrased, 'for the official game efforts were made to make it scary'. I removed both, the former is irrelevant, the latter is original research and quite obvious. Lots42 (talk) 15:33, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will need better screenshot

The current screenshot is from the Doom 64 TC for the Doomsday engine, which, in addition to not being the actual N64 game, is also notoriously obsolete among the playerbase. Failing an actual N64 shot, one from the much more faithful Doom64EX could do the trick. 89.92.27.39 (talk) 16:53, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Doom 64. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713005427/http://uk.ign64.ign.com/articles/150/150503p1.html to http://uk.ign64.ign.com/articles/150/150503p1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]