Jump to content

Talk:Downtown MRT line

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More about the plan of Downtown MRT Line reveal

[edit]

"Five stops planned for first phrase of Downtown MRT line" That was the article on the main page of the 15th March 2007 edition of The Straits Times. The article tell us that:

  • Estimated Cost: S$10 billion
  • Estimated completion: 2020
  • Estimated Ridership: 600,000-750,000
  • Likely MRT interchange along the Eastern Region section includes Chinatown, Bras Basah and MacPherson.
  • The Eastern Region section will then continue eastward, passing Kaki Bukit, Bedok and end at Tampines. It could also branch off towards Telok Kurau and Marine Parade in future.
  • The Bukit Timah section will intersect all MRT line, including CircleLine, with possible MRT interchange at Bugis, Jalan Besar, Little India and Botanic Gardens. This section will end at Bukit Panjang.
  • "More people will be attracted to take the train as the network becomes more comprehensive and better able to bring people from point to point across the island." Quote from Mr. Cedrid Foo
  • The rail ridership is expected to surpass the bus ridership when Downtown Line opens.
  • The other MRT station along Downtown Line not mentioned above: Dhoby Ghaut (another possible alignment) & Bedok North (possible interchange of the possible Marine Parade extension).

I hope that the following information could be added in the article. I, however, may not be able to reply quickly as I am quite busy. Aranho 06:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Location of stations

[edit]

If anyone know where are the station locations, please let me know so that I can update the geo-location maps. Thanks!--Vsion 07:11, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update

[edit]

List of Main Contractors, Project Number and some details for each station project to be listed. Will contribute. --Chris: Chrish.sg (talk) 10:54, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

stations

[edit]

Those showed on ch5 news weren't officially announced by LTA or MOT. In fact, ch5 news only showed part of the line, plus the fact that when the map was shown, they were talking about the awarding of contract for bugis and promenade stations; hardly convincing. The video can be found here. The stations should not be treated as confirmed. - oahiyeel talk 07:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you would notice that "bedok" had an interchange symbol in the video. that was never announced, but seen in some rail fan maps in the past when the "ERL" cut through bedok into marine parade. - oahiyeel talk 07:43, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The local media, in particular the local news, simply do not have a reputation of displaying any map of this nature based purely on speculation. If the media has displayed a map which was not disclosed officially, than this still qualifies to be displayed in wikipedia, based on our WP:V policy. Kindly be affray with wikipedia's policies before attempting to institutionalise personal policies.--Huaiwei (talk) 15:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not about to go into any edit war, and if you insist, I would not remove the stations any more, but note that the article's headline was "Locations of Downtown Line stations will depend on commuter traffic" - in short, nothing is confirmed, even if it displayed a map with these locations. Plus the fact that bedok was showed with an interchange symbol - does it mean that we can now edit the station article and change it to an interchange station instead? i think not. just my two pence. - oahiyeel talk 02:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
i think those stations are not offical. i think it is shown on the map is because the line passes through those place. Ragnaroknike (talk) 05:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have reliable sources to counter the information displayed? If not, personal opinions do not count.--Huaiwei (talk) 11:21, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you may notice, there is a stark difference between station location and station names. I fail to see how the case of Bedok should render this entire list as "unofficial", when they were all shown on national television run by a "state-controlled" media company. Wikipedia is about verifiability, not truth. Kindly be affray with basic wikipedia guidelines. Thank you.--Huaiwei (talk) 11:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, the media company you're talking about is not "state-controlled". Had the information specifically reported on the official transcript of the news or read out by the news anchor, I'd say that is reliable information. Assuming a picture in the background is correct, instead of the main focus of the use of picture (in this case contracts for Bugis and Promenade), is not reliable information. The verifiability of the information in question should be the LTA/MOT or any government authorities. Another point to note: yes it may qualify to be displayed in wikipedia, but not in a misleading way, i.e. it should not be in the same table as the list stated as "officially announced". It could be placed as a note below the table (as I have done after some anon IP edits removed those stations). - oahiyeel talk 19:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to you to quantify just in what way MediaCorp is not state-controlled when it is a wholely-owned subsidiary of Temasek Holdings. Do you have evidence to show that MediaCorp's choice of content is independent of the government's? The fact remains that the state-controlled media will ultimately scrutinise carefully what it shows on national television, even if it is just a background animated map. Would CNA actually bother creating an animated map with information based on hearsay or (horrors) the fantasises of individual wikipedians? I wonder for how long you have been watching local television not to notice this. WP:V do not give additional credit to government or official sources. In fact, these official sources would be considered as primary sources, which are considered less desirable than secondary ones. In light of this, I have restored the said information.--Huaiwei (talk) 20:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What the media reports does not go through the censorship of the government. Media in sg practices self-censorship. As such, their choice of content is DEFINITELY independent of the government. Also, as for the map that appeared recently, it has appeared before in the article about speculative maps here. If you insist on adding the stations, I rest my case. Anyway it seems many IP edits do not agree with you; so I would not be bother with you anymore. Someone who frequently & controversially gets into 3RR/edit warring, and often insist/forces their views on others just ain't worth my time and effort. - oahiyeel talk 21:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cross Street Viaduct

[edit]

Just wondering, is the temporary Cross Street Viaduct notable enough to be included on Wikipedia? I have been thinking of doing this since last year but I afraid that it will be put up on AFD due to my lack of editing experiences. But after I have created ION Orchard and The Orchard Residences and extending Iluma without any conflicts so far, I have decided to ask you guys if I should go ahead with this. Take note that I have currently found one reliable source. Aranho (talk) 14:21, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More DTL Information

[edit]

Go check out the LTA tender documents for 9158A at www.gebiz.gov.sg. There is quite a bit of information about the DTL there. For one, the alphanumeric station codes appear to be updated. Also, Rochor station is slated to be an interchange station for DTL2 and DTL3. --unkx80 (talk) 19:47, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

rochor

[edit]

now that the stage 3 stations are announced, is rochor still an interchange station between stage 2 and 3? since the map provided by lta does not clarify this -Ragnaroknike (talk) 15:26, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] 

:Nope  - oahiyeel talk 07:48, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

operator?

[edit]

isnt smrt mentioned to be the operator in the cnn news about the downtown line train mock-up? or at least that is what i heared. the news is actually quite old aready, so a source might not be easy to find. maybe i am wrong too. -Ragnaroknike (talk) 06:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I could not find sources for this, however this The Straits Times article from a week ago clearly mentions the Land Transport Authority still owns the project. Until a better source can be found this is all we can say for sure.Mardochaios (talk) 20:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

changed to blue?

[edit]

it appears to be updated to be blue instead of brown. -Ragnaroknike (talk) 06:31, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DTL 4 Hume

[edit]

Talk:Hume MRT Station#Why do we even need this article? -115.66.225.183 (talk) 01:16, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DTL2 - Platforms A & B mixed-up?

[edit]

Could I check the train directions at all platforms "A" and "B" along all DTL stage 2 stations? Apparently there's been some random edits to the stations' articles that left me quite confused. I recalled all Platforms A going towards Bt Panjang and B going towards Chinatown, but I can't be sure. NoNews! 06:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are right and the necessary changes have been made. Thanks 33ryantan (talk) 07:29, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Downtown MRT Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Downtown MRT Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:16, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Downtown MRT Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Downtown MRT Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Line 11 (Singapore MRT)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Line 11 (Singapore MRT) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 9 § Line 11 (Singapore MRT) until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 09:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Line 12 (Singapore MRT)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Line 12 (Singapore MRT) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 9 § Line 12 (Singapore MRT) until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 09:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Downtown_MRT_line&oldid=1233483542"