Talk:Ed Kosiski

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

NASCAR Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject NASCAR, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to NASCAR. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, you can visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.NASCARWikipedia:WikiProject NASCARTemplate:WikiProject NASCARNASCAR articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

4/25/2012 Removed large block of un-sourced, irrelevant critique of the judicial system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.70.63.4 (talk) 20:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

5/14/2012 Re-removed large block of un-sourced, irrelevant critique of the judicial system. Honestly, this page should just be locked. It seems to be attracting a "she deserved raping" character.

5/16/2012 I hope this page is locked so the large block remains as it should. It isn't un-sourced and it isn't irrelevant. As far as the "she deserved raping" comment, the prosecutor should have refused to reduce charges so the actual facts could come out. I don't know anyone personally in this story in this story, but I know how the justice system works and the strategies involved fall well-short of a pointed interest in actual truth being determined in a large number of instances. To make a hypothetical point, being a victim of "attempted sexual assault" means there was no one actually assaulted. Avoiding trial so the prosecution witness doesn't have to testify is always a shady strategy, especially in cases where the consequences are so high, not only in the present, but in the future if a true child-predator is given a light sentence as a result or an innocent person is manipulated by games and is left throwing in the towel to bring closure to their situation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.13.136.147 (talk) 21:45, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

5/28/2012 It's totally irrelevant. This is a biographical page. The facts are as I stated them - your frequent additions are matters of opinion. A critique of the judicial system or an attack on the character of the victim, add nothing to this page (and the latter is creepy). Ed chose to avoid trial (http://omaha.com/article/20110907/NEWS97/709079922), the judicial system did not. Plea-bargains are not inflicted on a defendant. Had he gone to trial he could have presented all of the evidence he wanted. I'm also not totally sure what you consider a "true child-predator" to be, but read the references - by any measure Ed fits the bill. (Surely, you are not suggesting that Ed is not a "true child-predator" because he paid someone for the "right" to do this?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.70.63.4 (talk) 07:03, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

6/21/2012 Re-removed block of commentary about the judicial system, an opinion on it's handling of this case, some opinions on the character of the victim, etc. --174.70.63.4 (talk) 17:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

6/24/2012 Re-removed block of commentary about the judicial system, an opinion on it's handling of this case, some opinions on the character of the victim, etc. --174.70.63.4 (talk) 16:33, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

6/25/2012 Re-removed block of commentary about the judicial system, an opinion on it's handling of this case, some opinions on the character of the victim, etc. --174.70.63.4 (talk) 21:34, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

6/26/2012 Re-removed block of commentary about the judicial system, an opinion on it's handling of this case, some opinions on the character of the victim, etc. --174.70.63.4 (talk) 06:34, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

8/1/2012 Reported for resumption of edit war. 174.70.63.4 (talk) 06:16, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

8/1/2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The result of reporting this vandalism was that this page was semi-protected without reverting. [1] Please revert this article to: [2] Diff: [3] All sources are cited and the additional information is relevant for a BLP article. Thank you.

Done Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 04:49, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]