Jump to content

Talk:Edgar Martínez

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleEdgar Martínez has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 1, 2019Good article nomineeListed
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 2, 2020.

Spelling of last name

[edit]

Throughout the article, the names Martínez and Martinez (the i both with and without the accent) are both used. This should probably be made consistent. I'm posting the comment here rather than just doing it myself in case there's a good reason why it hasn't been done. --MrBoo (talk, contribs) 13:52, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Humanitarian section is copyrighted

[edit]

The "Humanitarian" section is copied, with only a word or two change, from the World Sport Humanitarian Inductee page (http://www.sportshumanitarian.com/inductees/edgar_martinez.html), where it is copyright. That section should be re-written or deleted, as appropriate 71.217.13.122 (talk) 08:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see it at all. --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 01:52, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Position

[edit]

The infobox template states "the position primarily played by the player," that being DH. Mention in the article should, and is provided, but the infobox should be the position he played the most. 1412 games is a lot more than 563 games. I would call that a "primary position." Also, lets not get into a "war" over what is a position. DH is in fact a playing position. --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 22:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Edgar Martínez/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kaiser matias (talk · contribs) 02:21, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I'll start reviewing this in the next day or so. Kaiser matias (talk) 02:21, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:


Comments:

* "He was not a highly regarded prospect, and signed with the Mariners as a free agent in 1982 for a small signing bonus." I'd reword to: "Not highly regarded as a prospect, he signed with the Mariners as a free agent in 1982, and was given a small signing bonus."

* "He played with cousin Carmelo Martínez." Where did they play? It's unclear if this was at a youth level, the semipro level, something else.

* "He played semiprofessional baseball..." Is there any note of what team/league he played for? Not critical to the article, but more information would certainly be a good thing if possible.

* "The Mariners signed him to a contract with a $4,000 signing bonus on December 12, 1982." As noted in the lead this was considered small. That should be mentioned again here as well. Something as simple as "a contract with a $4,000 signing bonus (a small amount at the time)" would be sufficient, just to ensure it's noted.

* "Martínez made his professional debut in Minor League Baseball with the Bellingham Mariners of the Class A-Short Season Northwest League in 1983." Would be good to note his position here.

* "He had a .173 batting average." I'm somewhat familiar with baseball, but no expert. However this sentence is kind of a fragment, and even including something like games played, or home runs (if he had any) would be good to expand it a bit. Even noting if it was over the whole season or part of it, anything to give a little context.

* "Keller included Martínez in the AIL, where he batted .340." Again, some context would help this out.

* "He returned to Chattanooga in 1986 and had a .960 fielding percentage, which led all third baseman." First, it should be "led all third basemen" (plural). Second, this shift to defensive stats is kind of sudden, and the lack of offensive stats is confusing. Any reason why it is dropped here (a quick look through the article doesn't show his defensive stats again).

    • Spelling fixed. By further looking, it's just quoting the source as opposed to deliberately showing bias towards defense, by looking at the offensive stats of that year, it's clear why the source focused on that instead. Yousou (Complain) 01:18, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

* The last paragraph of the "Prospect" section (about 1987 in Calgary) could be added to the preceding paragraph, to both bolster it and to eliminate a one-line paragraph.

* "Martínez made his major league debut on September 12, 1987..." Again, noting his position here (if not done earlier) would be good, especially as the next sentence implies Martinez played third base, but doesn't make it clear.

* "Mariano Rivera, when asked whether there was anyone he was afraid to face..." Should note who Rivera is: "Pitcher Mariano Rivera..."

*"The Mariners did not issue Martínez' uniform number, 11, to anyone since he retired." Reword to something like: "Since his retirment, the Mariners did not issue Martinez' uniform number 11 to any other player.

Overall not bad, just some wording to be cleared up. Once addressed I'll take another look, but shouldn't be too much. Kaiser matias (talk) 15:48, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I might not be the original nominator, but his lack of timely response meant I felt I could step in and do what you wanted. Hopefully we can move forward and the original nominator step back in at some point if we need more work done. Yousou (Complain) 01:28, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Yousou: Thanks for handling this, it looks good now. Kaiser matias (talk) 14:48, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]