This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nigeria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nigeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NigeriaWikipedia:WikiProject NigeriaTemplate:WikiProject NigeriaNigeria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
The alleged involvement with an American woman is potentially libelous or damaging to either party if not presented carefully. Although sometimes relevant, the private life of a public person should not be given undue emphasis. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The woman in question, Cheryl Uzamere, has broadcast her claims through letters to numerous public officials and a website, http://www.thecrimesofsenatoruzamere.com (In fact I first came here looking for a wiki article about her.) The controversy, at least, is public. The trick would be balancing her side of the story and his (not to speak of miscellaneous lawyers and public officials whom she characterizes as participants in a vast Jewish conspiracy).Dawud (talk) 02:26, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Cheryl Uzamere's website cannot be considered reliable, but a court has decided that there is substance to her claims and that should be covered. My view is that the subject's public career is far more important than their private life. An article on John Kennedy or Bill Clinton should cover their sexual indiscretions, but not discuss them in excessive detail. It is only a small part of their impact on the world. Aymatth2 (talk) 03:52, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
