Talk:Stadion, Malmö

Stadion, Malmö has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 11, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stadion, Malmö article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Sweden Mid‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: Sweden Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Swedish football task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Event Venues (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Swedbank Stadion/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cliftonian (talk · contribs) 23:58, 10 March 2012 (UTC) Will review this tomorrow (11 March), just reserving it now. —Cliftonian (talk) 23:58, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
This looks pretty good. You've followed MOS very well, but, without meaning to cause you offence, your written English is sometimes a little bit choppy. If you would like me to copy-edit this for you, I am happy to do so when I have time. Generally the information is good, it just needs a bit of polishing. Be advised that I spotted a hyphen rather than an en-dash in a Sweden match result in the "Other uses" section.
Have given this a good going-over myself. Looks good to me now. Y —Cliftonian (talk) 15:28, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
No dead links. Everything, so far as I can see, correctly referenced to reliable sourced. Looks good to me.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
I see nothing omitted which most readers would need from an article of this sort.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
No point of view evident.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Considerable recent work, but all by one editor with a good reputation, with whom I am also well acquainted in this context. The work is all constructive and I doubt it could be construed as causing instability.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Alt text is missing, but this is not necessary for GAN. You are probably already aware that you will need to add it if you potentially take this to FAC, however.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Just needs some work on the prose, as explained above. I am happy to help with this if asked. I see no other problems before this ultimately passes. —Cliftonian (talk) 00:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good now. Passing. Well done! —Cliftonian (talk) 15:28, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 20 external links on Swedbank Stadion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:57, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 June 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Calidum 19:18, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eleda Stadion → Stadion (Malmö) – According to WP:FOOTBALL, unsponsored names should be used where possible. Sponsored names should only be used if the stadium has only ever been known by a sponsored name. This is not the case with Eleda Stadion, as it was known as "Stadion" between 2018 and 2019, when it lacked sponsorship deal. Furthermore, "Stadion" is the the most commonly used name in everyday speech. Mattias321 (talk) 14:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Giant Snowman 11:06, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom, correct in saying that we do not used sponsored names where possible, and article makes it clear that the stadium is known simply as 'Stadion' in between sponsorship deals. Giant Snowman 11:10, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Mikus (talk) 22:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, no need to jump each time a sponsor writes a check.--Bob not snob (talk) 08:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.