Talk:Elizabeth Keckley

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Business Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

African diaspora

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 February 2021 and 18 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sullivanjess98.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

I've removed this article from the GA nominee list because it needs a great deal of its language changed in order be more encyclopediac. Help would be appreciated, hoping to have it back on the list by the end of next week. Thanks. Bardofcornish (talk) 20:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

refs

My technical skills on WP are not great, and I'm having some trouble citing sources. Perhaps I'm using the wrong system (footnotes) but how do I get number one to appear under a refrences section? Any help would be greatly apreciated, or leave a comment on my talk page. Thanks. Bardofcornish 00:40, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it's been fixed. Bardofcornish 12:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Birth name?

What was it?

Glizzy Gobbler — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.8.237.124 (talk) 19:53, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propaganda

There seems to be a blatant piece of propaganda in the paragraph about the novel by Chiaverini. Rhus (talk) 16:43, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, possibly it would be better to list it in the bibliography or have an "impact" section with a reference to it. It's worth mentioning, but not in that way, in the middle of the section like that.96.233.98.79 (talk) 16:29, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Elizabeth Keckley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling of Keckly's name

It is now established that Keckly's name is spelled "Keckly," not "Keckley." See footnotes 3, 4, and 5. Therefore, I think that "Keckley" in the title of the article and every use of "Keckley" in the article should be changed to "Keckly," with a statement somewhere containing the information in footnote 4, explaining that her name was previously misspelled. Maurice Magnus (talk) 18:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]