Talk:Evie Hudak

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Colorado / State Legislatures / 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

Women in Red: #1day1woman (2022)

This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2022. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

WP:DOB needs a source

Jon698 (talk · contribs) has disruptively removed it several times. Per WP:BURDEN, the burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution. Toddst1 (talk) 04:18, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dude you are being ridiculous. Reference #2 is what gives her date of birth. The lead is a summarization of the article and should usually not have references within it. Jon698 (talk) 04:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While that source supports the DOB, the citation needs to be at the date of birth - as well as other sentences it supports. Putting the citation elsewhere is not citing the DOB and removing the direct citation is nothing short of disruptive. Toddst1 (talk) 04:29, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Popular and commonly edited articles such as Joe Biden and Donald Trump do not have citations for the date of birth in the lead. It is also unnecessary to have a ref name for the first sentence as the reference itself is after the very next sentence. All information before a reference must be cited in that reference so it is not "removing a direct citation" as you claim for some reason. Jon698 (talk) 04:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Put it the citation in the lede or the body - WP:LEDECITE allows both but as you left it, the DOB is NOT cited. Toddst1 (talk) 04:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a reference for it in the body. The date of birth is cited by reference #2. Jon698 (talk) 04:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, her marriage is supported by #2. The source could (and did) support her DOB invoking the WP:REFNAME, but it has been removed from that sentence. Per WP:CITEFOOT

The citation should be added close to the material it supports, offering text–source integrity. If a word or phrase is particularly contentious, an inline citation may be added next to that word or phrase within the sentence, but it is usually sufficient to add the citation to the end of the clause, sentence, or paragraph, so long as it's clear which source supports which part of the text.

And per WP:WHYCITE:

editors are always encouraged to add or improve citations for any information contained in an article.

not encouraged to remove them when having the citation invoked twice would be unambiguous. Toddst1 (talk) 05:05, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple sentences, even those containing the date of birth, can be sourced by the same reference in the style that I did. You can see Ronald Reagan, a FA, for example or hundreds of other biographies. I am done arguing with you. Jon698 (talk) 05:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain how you believe removing the reliably sourced citation from the sentences and/or infobox where her date of birth is stated is constructive. Toddst1 (talk) 05:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]