Talk:Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

July 2006 news from People's Daily

Their hopes before first plasma. - Does say "ITER also runs a fusion reactor based in Russia which is four-times the size of EAST." ! - Rod57 (talk) 12:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What plasma facing materials

The article could mention which plasma facing materials are used in EAST. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.94.244.204 (talk) 08:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Need more on Long pulses

How will it achieve such long pulses ? The Non-inductive current drive ? Need more on that. - Rod57 (talk) 13:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on EAST. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070927070108/http://www.lacronica.com/EdicionEnLinea/Notas/CienciayTecnologia/01032007/224657.aspx to http://www.lacronica.com/EdicionEnLinea/Notas/CienciayTecnologia/01032007/224657.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

checked - looks ok based on URL, original now 404. but archive is of spanish so not ideal - Rod57 (talk) 13:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced it with a ref in english - perhaps this entire section could be deleted ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What other results since 2006

eg when did they achieve 1MA currents, when did they achieve H-mode for 6.4 sec - what densities are they reporting ? - Rod57 (talk) 12:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Other parameters of the 102 second plasma shot

Looking at the screen shot on That's cute, Germany – China shows the world how fusion is done "shot 59892" it seems to show a current of 400kA for 100secs and a density of about 2.4 x 10¹⁸/m³ with slowly increasing temperature. Maybe not H-mode or they would have claimed that. Looks like deliberate reduction of plasma current - possibly some component was overheating. - Rod57 (talk) 13:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NB: Tore Supra reported a 6.5 minute plasma in 2003 - maybe cooler or less dense ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

== Comments from People's Daily is irrelevant to the objective accessment of the project. == The targetted Plasma current is 1MA.

Substituted at 01:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://202.127.205.12/asipp-english/R_east.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901043025/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2006-03/24/content_4341563.htm to http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2006-03/24/content_4341563.htm
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://mdn.mainichi-msn.co.jp/international/asia/news/20060602p2g00m0in032000c.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]