Talk:Francis Owen (philologist)

Francis Owen (philologist) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 22, 2021. (Reviewed version).

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Francis Owen (philologist)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 06:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

Is it reasonably well written?

Yes, concise

Early Life and Education

Is it reasonably well written?

Good, well narrated.
Neat, well scribed. Would that it were that the Commonwealth (and Winston) were appraised of his views.

Career

Is it reasonably well written?

'tis a pity all these references to Edmonton Journal require registration to read

Later Life

Is it reasonably well written?

Welcommen in Deutschland.
Well scribed, well referenced.

Selected Works

Is it reasonably well written?

A link to the University of Chicago Wikipedia page is not a good reference. It seems the best reference might be to Alliterative_verse

References

Is it reasonably well written?

All examined

End Matter

Is it is Broad in its coverage?

Yes

Is it Verifiable with no original research?

Yes, all information is suitably referenced

Does the article meet notability guidelines?

Yes.

Does it follow WP:NPOV Neutral Point of View?

Quite so.

Is it stable?

This page started life on 31 August 2019
Over 90 days, this page has had 190 views
There have been six human editors (bots have been on the page)
There have been 39 edits to the page with no evidence of edit warring.

Top editors are

    * Krakkos
    * Chewings72
    * John of Reading
    * Orenburg1
    * DuncanHill
    * FeanorStar7

It is illustrated by images ?

The image of Dr. Francis Owen is a picture of Francis Owen printed in the Edmonton Journal
This Canadian work is in the public domain in Canada because its copyright has expired

Overall

Good work, good scribing.

Conclusion

Passed --Whiteguru (talk) 03:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC) @Krakkos:[reply]

Great! Krakkos (talk) 13:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]