This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Who removed images without discussion and why? Timeshift (talk) 05:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Oops, sorry, that was my bad. I was rewriting the article in my sandbox so that this article wouldn't look like a sandbox and neglected to re-add the images. I will return at least one - a second may not fit. Littleteddy (roar!) 10:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
A short note about length: Tudor didn't have a very eventful or lengthly life. This is the reason for the short article. Littleteddy (roar!) 11:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Informal feedback: I took a look at the article, and am not hopeful that it will pass. Two things stand out to me: first, the lead section is not nearly thorough enough; it should give a pretty good overview of the subject, and clearly identify why he is noteworthy. Second, the article is essentially all based on one source. (Only a couple small details are cited to others.) Though this is not technically a disqualifier for GA, it seems likely to me that there are other sources available. I would prefer to see an article have a number of independent sources before a GA nom. Hope this is helpful, looks like an interesting guy! -Pete (talk) 19:01, 20 March 2008 (UTC)