Jump to content

Talk:Fugly (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 06:43, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Fugly (film)Fugly – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. Super Camille (talk) 16:32, 14 June 2014 (UTC) There is no page named Fugly, it redirects here. Swear words in the indian language aren't redirects to their English translation. So this page should be moved to Fugly, removing excessive disambiguation.[reply]

Is this the same as "The Fug Awards", mentioned at Go_Fug_Yourself#The_Fug_Awards, such that TV Fugly Awards should redirect there? DMacks (talk) 19:30, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, [1] vs [2] sound different. DMacks (talk) 19:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per In ictu oculi. I don't see how "swear words in the indian language" is relevant here, since "fucking ugly" is an English swear and this is the English wikipedia. That meaning was already rejected as a viable WP article itself (transwikied as dictdef), so we at least need a redirect-hatnote pointing to wikt:fugly or to an en.wp page about ugliness. But now that there seems to be a potential for another actual article on a third independent topic, I'd support a dab page (especially because "english common phrase" vs "indian movie" seems a philosophical deadlock for WP:PRIMARYTOPIC). DMacks (talk) 19:25, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fugly (consensus delete) was for the dictdef; the later Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fugly (2nd nomination) was for the film itself. DMacks (talk) 19:34, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, but in this case, the word is a complete fiction. The word means Fighting Ugly. I'm sure it isn't a real word. I am even fine with this page being moved to F*UGLY. As for awards, there aren't listed on disambigs. It will be Fugly awards. A hatnotr for Wikitionary can be added here.--Super Camille (talk) 00:48, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I looked at about half of the sources used and none of them use the typography F*Ugly, not even the one that repeated a tweet from the producer who also simply used Fugly, as does the entry at IMDB. The only place i see F*Ugly is in the typography of the promotional poster, which is a place where choices for graphic visual display take preferential lead over accuracy. Is there a significant batch of reliably published sources that use the astrix? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:44, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.


Requested move 26 March 2018

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 18:18, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Fugly (film)Fugly – This is the only article named Fugly, and it is standard practice not to disambiguate an article title unless it is needed. Fugly should be moved to Fugly (disambiguation) Jax 0677 (talk) 20:34, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:29, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.