From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Untitled discussion[edit]

Gcompris requires 20$ for registration to unlock most of the program features... It is not correct to classify this software as free or include in free software portal. 10:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

As far as I know, only the Windows version is crippled[1] (which the article notes in the intro). The Linux version is free (as in free beer). Since the source code is available as well, it classifies as "free software". Free software != freeware. utcursch | talk 11:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry to resurrect an old issue, but the first discusser was actually right. It doesn't matter that the code is available for GNU/Linux, if you cannot get access to it just because you use Windows, the program is not free as in freedom. Freedom 0 is "The freedom to run the program, for any purpose". --–w2bh talkcontribs 14:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
You are free to download the source code and compile it yourself for Windows (although you would probably want to remove the code prompting for a key). However, many users will choose not to do so because compiling the software for Windows is likely to be more involved than GNU/Linux. This was discussed briefly on the fsf-community-team mailing list in June 2012 (the archives are private, but you can view them if you sign up for the list). Mikegerwitz (talk) 14:56, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

J'ai Compris[edit]

J'ai compris does not mean 'I understand'. It is in the past tense and means 'I have understood'. 16:28, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Andy

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GCompris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)