This article was nominated for deletion on 15 August 2023. The result of the discussion was redirect.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
As of a few hours ago, Amo won the Democratic nomination for RI Congress 1. The notability situation has certainly changed since that AfD. In my personal opinion the article should have never been redirected in the first place, especially not hours before votes began in a primary election. Blind adherence. How would you suggest we better handle this situation? - Skipple☎02:51, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it's necessarily fair that the consensus reached at an AfD discussion is overridden so soon, and by a user not involved with the original deletion discussion. To your point about the notability situation changing-- I believe that winning a primary is different from winning the election, and that was my understanding of what was said in the deletion discussion as well. Either way, I don't have strong feelings towards the fate of the article; at the least, I am concerned with the possibility that this article will continue to be edited (as it often was before protection was added) by people who have a COI or will not adhere to neutral point of view. And, what do you mean by "Blind adherence"? StartOkayStop (talk) 03:15, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
While I totally recognize I'm attempting to WP:CRYSTALBALL here, Amo is the Democratic nom in a deeply blue Congressional District. Unless extraordinary circumstances occur, he will almost certainly be the Congressmen from RI 1 come November. My suggestion is that by blindly adhering to NPOL and the AfD, we are ignoring the fact that we are deleting an article hours prior to a primary election involving that individual. This, in my opinion is irresponsible and in doing so we are ignoring the main goal of Wikipedia. This is the perfect circumstance to ignore the rules. As the page wasn't WP:SALTED I don't believe there is any restriction to when the page can be re-created, especially when circumstances surrounding the subject change, but perhaps the closing admin can answer that for us. @Liz: Any chance you could clarify? - Skipple☎04:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. I think many people in that discussion saw Walton as a complete shoo-in as she was the only candidate on the ballot. In this case, there is a Republican nominee who will be on the ballot. And while this is a very likely Democratic district, this is still WP:CRYSTAL thinking. - Enos733 (talk) 03:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think you misunderstood what I said. What I am trying to say is that the mayor of Buffalo is not an WP:NPOL-conferring position, meaning that even if Walton had won the election she would still have to pass WP:GNG. Curbon7 (talk) 04:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I do agree with you, coverage of a mayor must be much more than "they exist," but that was not what the deletion discussion focused on. Nearly all keep voters there said something like her primary victory has been "almost universally recognized as tantamount to election," since there was no other candidates on the general election ballot. Only a couple participants talked about the quality of the sourcing, with at least the nominator pushing back suggesting that the coverage at the time was routine for candidates. - Enos733 (talk) 05:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think it was a mistake to redirect the page two days before the election, just when the candidate's actual notability was at its highest for voters seeking to educate themselves before voting. (In a deep blue state, the Democratic primary *is* the election in most cases, the general election is a formality.) Rhode Island being a small state, this election got little media coverage, and voters had to do their own research to educate themselves about the candidates; Wikipedia is a valuable resource for this. Llajwa (talk) 16:14, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Llajwa I can't say I agree with this specific position. Wikipedia isn't meant to be a directory of political candidates. Furthermore, what value does a potential voter get out of looking at a Wikipedia article as opposed to, say, a single local news source? The decision to redirect the page also was not related to the election, as the AfD was open for weeks before. StartOkayStop (talk) 16:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already done Cannolis (talk) 03:46, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cannolis (talk) 03:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 18:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC)